Learning Management Systems in Higher Education ... - CTools

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tool Use DifferencesBetween CampusesCategoryToolResidentialCampusCommuterCampusMeanDifferenceLearner-ContentLearner-InstructorContent Shar<strong>in</strong>g 57.7% 52.4% 5.3Drop Box 4.8% 2.6% 2.2Email Archive 0.5% 0.1% 0.4Chat 0.8% 1.7% 0.9Learner-LearnerDiscussion 1.3% 3.0% 1.7Forums 0.6% 2.9% 2.3Messages 2.9% 6.2% 3.3SI & USE LabUniversity of MichiganTuesday, November 9, 2010
Summary• No significant differences for <strong>in</strong>structorperceptions between campuses• Residential students rated & usedLearner-Content activities / tools higherthan commuter students• Commuter students rated & usedLearner-Learner activities / tools higherthan commuter studentsSI & USE LabUniversity of MichiganTuesday, November 9, 2010
Page 1 and 2: Learning Management Systemsin Highe
Page 3 and 4: USE LabResearch Team• Steven Lonn
Page 5 and 6: LMS GrowthSI & USE LabUniversity of
Page 7 and 8: Different Types ofInteractions• D
Page 9 and 10: Survey Items by Interaction TypeTue
Page 11 and 12: Survey Items by Interaction Type•
Page 13 and 14: Multi-InstitutionalResearch Questio
Page 15 and 16: Findings• Learner-Content (LC)•
Page 17 and 18: Residential vs.Commuter• Instruct
Page 19: User Log DifferencesBetween Campuse
Page 23 and 24: How Does LMS AffectUse of In-Class
Page 25 and 26: Learner-Content(LC) InteractionsStu
Page 27 and 28: Other InteractionsStudents• "Many
Page 29: Negative Responses• Students main
Page 32 and 33: Qualitative Analysis Summary• Fac
Page 34 and 35: Examples of LMS Use• Principles o
Page 36 and 37: LectureTools• Hybrid for LC, LI,
Page 38 and 39: Conclusions• Across campuses, LMS
Page 40 and 41: Future LearningSpaces with LMS• A

Learning Management Systems in Higher Education ... - CTools

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?