11.07.2015 Views

Expendable Remotely Piloted Vehicles for Strategic Offensive ...

Expendable Remotely Piloted Vehicles for Strategic Offensive ...

Expendable Remotely Piloted Vehicles for Strategic Offensive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

spite the successes, it is easily possible to envision how strategic attackRPVs could have been of value. The following sections cover the significantairpower events during the first night of Desert Storm. Concepts of howRPVs could supplement Desert Storm operations, particularly in strategicoffensive airpower roles, will follow each section. Chapters 4 and 5 of thispaper will expand upon many of these RPV concepts and roles. 27B-52 BombersThe B-52 Strato<strong>for</strong>tress is an age-defying aircraft which embodies USAF“Global Reach, Global Power” doctrine. The decision to use a B-52 representsthe serious level of US political and military resolve. In order to participate inDesert Storm on opening night, B-52s launched from four international locations—themost distant being Barksdale AFB, Louisiana. While the releaseof payloads was over in minutes, the time required to travel to launch pointsand back took as long as 24 hours. In addition to a large and versatileweapons payload capability, the B-52—nicknamed “Buff”—conveys a greatdeal of psychological influence; this can be a positive influence on friendly<strong>for</strong>ces and a very negative influence on the enemy.Complementing manned bombers such as the B-52, RPVs could alsoper<strong>for</strong>m strategic attack missions rapidly, accurately, and with intensity.All the US services could theoretically launch and control them from a varietyof plat<strong>for</strong>ms, which would provide more speed, flexibility, and precision.Used in large numbers they could also be a significant psychological<strong>for</strong>ce, especially if they were used in harassment or decoy roles.Tanker SupportJust hours be<strong>for</strong>e the first strike, “one hundred sixty tankers—AmericanKC-10s, KC-135s, and KC-130s; British Victors, Tristars, and VC10Ks;and Saudi KE-3Bs among them—took off and flew to multiple refuelingtracks, staying out of range of Iraqi early warning radar.” 28 The tankerswere required to refuel hundreds of strike, suppression, and other supportaircraft. If tankers had failed or were somehow restricted in per<strong>for</strong>mingtheir vital mission, some manned attacks would have been impossibleto achieve.Depending upon their design and function, RPVs would not normallyrequire refueling. This would likely be the case if they were expendable,which could double their range and time over areas of operation since areturn trip would not be necessary. General McPeak, however, believes theUnited States should look into the concept of UAV refueling. A problemworth thinking about, he indicated, is “how to do pilotless air refueling—because range is very important.” 29Operational SecurityLaunches of multiple aircraft from any base can provide indications andwarning of an impending attack. The size and status of military aircraft—33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!