11.07.2015 Views

October - December 2012 - National Institute of Rural Development

October - December 2012 - National Institute of Rural Development

October - December 2012 - National Institute of Rural Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Status <strong>of</strong> Tenancy in Uttar Pradesh: Some Facts from the Field 415Table 31 : Tenants Reporting Undue Favours Taken by LandlordsUndue Favours Lakhimpur Hardoi Sultanpur Etah Jhansi AllLabour on Unfavourable Terms 1 3 5 3 3 15(4.65) (5.36) (8.33) (6.00) (6.12) (5.81)Labour at Lower Rates 1 7 7 11 11 37(4.65) (12.50) (11.67) (22.00) (22.45) (14.34)Demand to Work as - 1 6 4 1 12Permanent Servant (1.79) (10.00) (8.00) (2.04) (4.65)Total 2 1118 1815 64(4.65) (19.64) (30.00) (36.00) (30.61) (24.81)Source: Field Survey.Problems Faced by Tenants : The tenantswere also asked about the problems theyfaced as tenants. Nearly one-third tenantscomplained about insecurity <strong>of</strong> tenancy. Overone-fourth <strong>of</strong> the tenants mentioned nonavailability<strong>of</strong> institutional credit as a problem.Over one-fifth faced problem <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong>equipment and machinery for cultivation.Exploitation by landlord was reported byabout one-sixth <strong>of</strong> the tenants (Table 32).Table 32 : Problems Faced by the TenantsProblems Lakhimpur Hardoi Sultanpur Etah Jhansi AllInsecurity 6 16 43 8 37 110<strong>of</strong> Tenancy (13.96) (21.62) (38.39) (16.00) (52.11) (31.42)Non-availability <strong>of</strong> 15 16 38 1 23 93Institutional Credit (34.88) (21.62) (33.93) (2.00) (32.39) (26.57)Non-availability <strong>of</strong> 9 33 3 32 1 78Machinery & Equipment (20.93) (44.60) (2.68) (64.00) (1.41) (22.29)Exploitation 13 8 19 7 10 57by Landlord (30.23) (10.81) (16.96) (14.00) (14.09) (16.29)Non-sharing <strong>of</strong> - 1(1.35) 9(8.04) 2(4.00) - 12(3.43)cultivation costTotal 43 74 112 50 71 350(100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00)Source : Field Survey.Views <strong>of</strong> Tenants on Legalisation <strong>of</strong>Tenancy : As mentioned earlier, tenancy isillegal in U.P. although it prevails in all parts<strong>of</strong> the State in a concealed form. Therespondents were asked whether in theirview tenancy should be legalised. More than75 per cent <strong>of</strong> the tenants reported thattenancy should be legalised (Table 33), whileJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, Vol. 31, No. 4, <strong>October</strong> - <strong>December</strong> : <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!