11.07.2015 Views

October - December 2012 - National Institute of Rural Development

October - December 2012 - National Institute of Rural Development

October - December 2012 - National Institute of Rural Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

442 M. Mahadeva and K. KeshavamurthyTable 2 : (Contd.)(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)Raichur 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.36 0.03 0.03 0.41 0.39 94.89Chamarajanagar 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.25 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.27 84.57D.Kannada 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.18 0.05 0.03 0.25 0.21 85.05U.Kannada 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.32 0.02 0.02 0.40 0.35 86.58Gadag 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.18 0.16 86.8Chikkaballapur 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 72Directorate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.65 0.76 0.65 85.63Total 7.58 4.64 7.96 7.02 2.07 1.82 17.60 13.48 76.58Note :This information is only for schemes namely SUBACS, ICDP. Rice (Work plan paddy)and Foundation and Certified Seed Production <strong>of</strong> Vegetable crops <strong>of</strong> MMASs. Theinformation relating to Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) is not maintained bythe Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, GoK for the period under review. The informationregarding the Foundation and Certified Seeds (<strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> Vegetable Crops)are considered only for the years 2004-05 and 2005-06.Source : Calculations are based on information provided by the Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultureand Horticulture, Government <strong>of</strong> Karnataka.Dharwad, Chikkamagalur and Havery districtshas been contracted from the year 2007-08due to poor performance <strong>of</strong> these districtsunder the scheme. It is evident from Table 2that the financial target under SUBACS hasbeen gradually increased from ` 0.45 crorein 2004-05 to ` 5.57 crore in 2007-08. Butsignificantly, the target achievement isconsiderably low at 61 per cent, owing toerosion <strong>of</strong> interest in the crop itself and somedistricts (Dharwad, Havery, Kolar, andChikkamagalur) did not even get theallocation during 2007-08, under the scheme.However, Bagalkote, Shimoga and Mandyahave shown a satisfactory progress under theSUBACS.Integrated Cereal <strong>Development</strong>Programme (ICDP) which was later mergedwith the work plan <strong>of</strong> paddy has been givena total assistance <strong>of</strong> ` 7.96 crore during 2004-05 to 2007-08 out <strong>of</strong> which ` 7.02 crore havebeen spent on various paddy promotionprogrammes with 88.27 per cent <strong>of</strong> financialachievement. It has been implemented in allthe paddy growing districts <strong>of</strong> the State inwhich Mandya has got the highest allocation<strong>of</strong> funds to the tune <strong>of</strong> ` 0.61 crore followedby Shimoga (` 0.57 crore), Koppal (` 0.51crore) and Mysore (` 0.49 crore). The fundutilisation <strong>of</strong> these districts also remainsacceptable with ` 0.57 crore, ` 0.51 crore,and ` 0.48 crore, respectively. On the otherhand, districts like Bagalkote (` 0.09 crore),Kodagu (` 0.09 crore), Bijapur (` 0.13 crore),Udupi (` 0.18 crore), Dakshin Kannada(` 0.19 crore) and Dharwad (` 0.21 crore)have lowest allocation <strong>of</strong> funds under thescheme.In 2007-08, Chikkaballapur has beengiven a separate allocation <strong>of</strong> ` 1 lakh underJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, Vol. 31, No. 4, <strong>October</strong> - <strong>December</strong> : <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!