11.07.2015 Views

KARNATAKA - of Planning Commission

KARNATAKA - of Planning Commission

KARNATAKA - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Karnataka Human Development Report 2005BOX 2.3AComposition <strong>of</strong> HDI 2001IndicatorDistrictHealth Education IncomeHDIIndex Rank Index Rank Index Rank Value Rank1 Bagalkot 0.597 27 0.636 22 0.539 12 0.591 222 Bangalore Rural 0.692 6 0.662 20 0.605 4 0.653 63 Bangalore Urban 0.705 5 0.887 1 0.666 1 0.753 14 Belgaum 0.712 2 0.699 15 0.532 13 0.648 85 Bellary 0.685 7 0.618 23 0.549 9 0.617 186 Bidar 0.638 17 0.689 17 0.470 26 0.599 217 Bijapur 0.627 24 0.642 21 0.499 23 0.589 238 Chamarajnagar 0.642 15 0.570 26 0.518 17 0.576 259 Chikmaglur 0.637 19 0.742 9 0.563 6 0.647 910 Chitradurga 0.660 12 0.704 14 0.517 18 0.627 1611 Dakshina Kannada 0.707 3 0.823 4 0.636 2 0.722 212 Davangere 0.680 8 0.711 13 0.515 19 0.635 1213 Dharwad 0.615 26 0.758 7 0.553 8 0.642 1014 Gadag 0.628 23 0.750 8 0.525 15 0.634 1315 Gulbarga 0.632 20 0.572 25 0.490 25 0.564 2616 Hassan 0.670 10 0.729 10 0.519 16 0.639 1117 Haveri 0.620 25 0.699 16 0.491 24 0.603 2018 Kodagu 0.638 18 0.833 3 0.621 3 0.697 419 Kolar 0.653 13 0.713 12 0.508 21 0.625 1720 Koppal 0.642 16 0.576 24 0.529 14 0.582 2421 Mandya 0.632 21 0.682 18 0.513 20 0.609 1922 Mysore 0.663 11 0.669 19 0.561 7 0.631 1423 Raichur 0.648 14 0.524 27 0.469 27 0.547 2724 Shimoga 0.707 4 0.766 6 0.547 10 0.673 525 Tumkur 0.672 9 0.714 11 0.505 22 0.630 1526 Udupi 0.713 1 0.842 2 0.588 5 0.714 327 Uttara Kannada 0.632 22 0.781 5 0.546 11 0.653 7Karnataka 0.680 0.712 0.559 0.650an element <strong>of</strong> double counting in the age group6-18 years for educational status. It may be notedthat due to changes in methodology, i.e. adoptingthe logarithm method in computation, there hasbeen a sudden increase in the values <strong>of</strong> the incomeindex. Another important factor is that changingthe base year from 1980-81 to 1993-94 forestimation <strong>of</strong> GDP at constant prices for India andthe states (introduced by the CSO) has contributedto higher values <strong>of</strong> income indices for 1991-92and 2001-02. In Karnataka, the estimates <strong>of</strong> lifeexpectancy at birth for districts and the state havebeen made on the basis <strong>of</strong> the regression methodinvolving the crude birth rate, the crude death rate,the rate <strong>of</strong> natural increase in population and theinfant mortality rate for 2001. In order to enable15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!