11.07.2015 Views

KARNATAKA - of Planning Commission

KARNATAKA - of Planning Commission

KARNATAKA - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Financing Human DevelopmentWithin all categories<strong>of</strong> education, one findsthat revenue expendituredominates totalexpenditure and is as highas 99 per cent and above.The share <strong>of</strong> capitalexpenditure is negligiblein the education sector.The share <strong>of</strong> primaryeducation in the totalrevenue expenditureis about 50 per centand that <strong>of</strong> secondaryeducation is 27 per cent.categories <strong>of</strong> education, one fi nds that revenueexpenditure dominates total expenditure and isas high as 99 per cent and above. The share <strong>of</strong>capital expenditure is negligible in the educationsector.General education takes the lion’s share(92 per cent) <strong>of</strong> the total revenue expenditureon education. Most importantly, the share<strong>of</strong> primary education in the total revenueexpenditure is about 50 per cent and that <strong>of</strong>secondary education is 27 per cent: the combinedshare <strong>of</strong> primary and secondary education intotal education expenditure is, thus, about77 per cent, which is as it should be.Thus, expenditure within the education sector inKarnataka is characterised by the dominant role <strong>of</strong>:(i) revenue expenditure in all types <strong>of</strong> education;(ii) general education within the education sector;and (iii) primary and secondary education withinthe general education.Comparison with all-India andselected statesA comparison <strong>of</strong> the ratios and patterns <strong>of</strong>expenditure at all-India level (all states andCentral Government), and with other southernstates (Andhra Pradesh, Kerala and Tamil Nadu)for three years [2000-01 (Actual/Accounts),2001-02 (Revised Estimates), and 2002-03(Budget Estimates)] reveals the following insightsfor Karnataka (Table 3.2.3): Karnataka’s PER (i.e. public educationexpenditure as a percentage <strong>of</strong> state income)on revenue expenditure was 3.41 per centin 2000-01. This ratio was higher than that<strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh (2.86 per cent) and theCentral Government (0.54 per cent), butlower than those <strong>of</strong> Kerala (4.11 per cent),Tamil Nadu (3.47 per cent) and the all states’average (4.36 per cent). Karnataka’s SAR (i.e. public educationexpenditure as a percentage <strong>of</strong> total publicexpenditure in the state) on revenueexpenditure has declined since 2000-01;it fell from 21.34 per cent in 2000-01 to19.02 per cent in 2001-02 and to 18.96per cent in 2002-03. These fi gures, too, arehigher than those <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh and theCentral Government, but lower than those <strong>of</strong>Kerala and Tamil Nadu.Karnataka’s SAR on capital expenditure wasabout 0.1 per cent from 2000-01 through2002-03. Kerala consistently recordedthe highest SAR on capital account: 1.34per cent in 2000-01, 2.35 per cent in2001-02 and 2.92 per cent in 2002-03.These fi gures clearly imply that revenue expenditure(or expenditure on salaries and grants) dominateseducation expenditure in all states and in thecountry as a whole. The inadequacy <strong>of</strong> funds, (aslow as 1 per cent), mainly impacts the non-salarycomponent <strong>of</strong> education expenditure, which isused for inputs such as infrastructure (construction<strong>of</strong> classrooms, providing equipment, libraries,laboratories, drinking water and toilets), teachers’training, curriculum development and instructionalmaterial – all <strong>of</strong> which contribute to improving thequality <strong>of</strong> education in state schools.Total revenue expenditure in public education isdistributed between plan and non-plan expenditure.A comparison <strong>of</strong> these expenditure patterns revealsthat non-plan education expenditure is higherthan plan expenditure on education in total planexpenditure, in all states and at the all-India level,in all the years. The non-plan expenditure <strong>of</strong> theEducation Department as a percentage <strong>of</strong> totalnon-plan expenditure in Karnataka was 21.12per cent in 2000-01, 18.18 per cent in 2001-02and 18.22 per cent in 2002-03. These shares arelower than those <strong>of</strong> Kerala and Tamil Nadu, buthigher than Andhra Pradesh, all states’ average(for 2000-01) and the Central Government (forall three years). Since plan expenditure is used fordevelopmental activities and non-plan expenditurefor maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets created during earlierPlan periods, the size <strong>of</strong> plan outlays is a trueindicator <strong>of</strong> improvements, either in coverage or inquality, or both, in education (Table 3.2.3).The share <strong>of</strong> plan expenditure <strong>of</strong> the EducationDepartment in Karnataka’s total expenditure isthe highest among all southern states, all states’average as well as the Central Government.Important components <strong>of</strong> plan expenditure include52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!