11.07.2015 Views

KARNATAKA - of Planning Commission

KARNATAKA - of Planning Commission

KARNATAKA - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Financing Human DevelopmentFIGURE 3.1.3Revenue deficit as percentage <strong>of</strong> fiscal deficit: 1990-91 to 2002-03Per cent60504030201000-10-201990-911991-921992-931993-941994-951995-96Years1996-971997-981998-991999-20002000-012001-022002-03Karnataka’s planexpenditure overa six-year period(2000-01 to 2005-06)yields interesting insightsabout the state’s prioritysectors. Investmentsin irrigation exceededinvestments in the socialsector in all years except2001-02 and 2003-04over a six-year period.expenditure on salaries and pensions accountedfor almost 34 per cent <strong>of</strong> the increase inrevenue expenditures between 1997-98 and2001-02. The increase in interest paymentsaccounted for about 17 per cent <strong>of</strong> the increasein revenue expenditure between 1997-98 and2001-02. Together, interest payments, salariesand pensions accounted for about 51 per cent<strong>of</strong> the rise in revenue expenditure between1997-98 and 2001-02. In comparison, less than10 per cent <strong>of</strong> the expenditure was made on physicalcapital outlay between the period 1997-98 and2001-02.The persistence <strong>of</strong> large revenue and fi scal defi citshas increased the debt burden <strong>of</strong> the state. Theoutstanding debt <strong>of</strong> the state government as aproportion <strong>of</strong> GSDP increased from about 17.6per cent in 1995-96 to about 25.7 per cent <strong>of</strong>GSDP in 2001-02. Correspondingly, interestpayments increased from 12.35 per cent <strong>of</strong> totalrevenue expenditure in 1995-96 to 14.4 percent in 2001-02. The Karnataka governmenthas now embarked on debt restructuring byswapping high interest loans for low interestloans. The burden <strong>of</strong> debt servicing is, thus,likely to come down in the next few years. In theshort and medium term this will provide somefi scal space for spending on more productivesectors.Sectoral prioritiesPlan expenditure 5 is associated with new policyinitiatives and development, while non-planexpenditure relates to maintenance <strong>of</strong> schemes thatwere introduced in earlier Plan periods. Karnataka’splan expenditure over a six-year period (2000-01to 2005-06) yields interesting insights about thestate’s priority sectors. Investments in irrigationexceeded investments in the social sector in all yearsexcept 2001-02 and 2003-04 over a six-year period(Table 3.1.3). Investments in energy exceededthose in education in all six years. Since the term‘social services’ encompasses education, health andfamily welfare, rural development, social welfare,and the development <strong>of</strong> women and children,to name a few sectors, the actual share <strong>of</strong> eachsub-sector is quite low.IrrigationKarnataka is second only to Rajasthan in theextent <strong>of</strong> arid land in the state. According to the1997 NSSO fi gures, the percentage <strong>of</strong> irrigatedland in the state is 19.33 per cent, which isconsiderably less than the all-India average <strong>of</strong>35.39 per cent. Even though the percentage<strong>of</strong> irrigated land in the state has increasedsince then, Karnataka still has less land underirrigation than the all-states’ average as well asthe other southern states. Most <strong>of</strong> the arid landis concentrated in north and central Karnataka,5Annual Plans, Karnataka.38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!