12. Four percent is not the number.a. “<strong>The</strong> number” increases for a more globally diversified portfolio.b. “<strong>The</strong> number” increases if withdrawals start at a time when markets are nothighly valued.c. “<strong>The</strong> number” increases if the client can take small decreases in withdrawals (ifthe client is willing to adjust spending in tough economic times).d. “<strong>The</strong> number” increases if planners and their clients are willing to makeadjustments along the way (react to the environment around them).e. Planning Point: <strong>The</strong> portfolio does not need to solve all spending needs. <strong>The</strong>re areother assets like Social Security, legacies, and the house that may help determinethe burden of the portfolio and consequently affect the safe withdrawal rate.13. <strong>The</strong> systematic withdrawal rate is not about how much we want to spend in retirement. Itis about how much of the retirement spending the portfolio is able to support. In otherwords, consider money from Social Security and other products.a. <strong>The</strong> portfolio needs to be connected to the retirement income puzzle.b. However, the portfolio does not need to solve all of the retirement income puzzle.14. <strong>The</strong>re are three strands of spending literature that address the question, “How muchcan you withdraw from your portfolio in any given year?” (Video: What is the traditionalthinking about sustainable withdrawal rates? Tacchino, Woerheide, Milevsky)a. Historical Monte Carlo analysis (historical Monte Carlo analysis can lead to asustainability number)b. Forward looking Monte Carlo analysis (forward looking Monte Carlo analysis canlead to a sustainability number)c. Avoid Monte Carlo analysis, but look at the probability of sustainability(1) Calculating a probability without referring to Monte Carlo simulators15. Common themes in the literature:a. Asset allocation is 50 to 75% equity (fixed over the retirement period)b. A real 4 to 5% withdrawal rate appears to be sustainable(1) $1,000,000—take 4% in the first year ($40,000). One strategy is to justtake $40,000 a year.(2) Another strategy is to inflation adjust the $40,000 [$40,000 x (1 + inflationrate)](3) A “real withdrawal rate” indicates inflation adjustments occur.c. A difference between 4 and 5 percent (100 basis points) can have a big impactover time.d. One can justify withdrawal rates of 4 to 7.5% depending on how effectively theportfolio is managed.e. <strong>The</strong> value of the literature is that it educates people to dramatically reduce theirexpectations concerning the amount they can withdraw.f. Withdrawal rates depend on time horizon. <strong>The</strong> longer the time horizon the lowerthe withdrawal rate.g. Annuity, Social Security, and pension income all factor into what a reasonablewithdrawal rate is for the client.h. Planning Point: For some clients it is more difficult to spend money than to savemoney.6.11
16. Early in the outline, we identified 4 different ways that the initial and current-yearsystematic withdrawal rates could be calculated.a. Take an initial withdrawal of the portfolio at retirement (e.g., 4 percent of$1,000,000, or $40,000 in the first year) and then adjust the $40,000 eachsubsequent year for inflation regardless of the current value of the portfolio.b. Take an initial withdrawal of the portfolio at retirement (e.g., 4 percent of$1,000,000, or $40,000 in the first year) and make that the “salary” each year forthe client. <strong>The</strong>re is no adjustment for inflation.c. Take an initial withdrawal of the portfolio at retirement (e.g., 4 percent of$1,000,000, or $40,000 in the first year) and make that the “salary” for the first yearof retirement. In each subsequent year continue using the 4 percent guideline, butapply it to the ending year’s account balance.d. Follow the methodologies in step a. [e.g., take an initial withdrawal of the portfolioat retirement (e.g., 5 percent of $1,000,000, or $50,000 in the first year)] andthen adjust the $50,000 each subsequent year for inflation regardless of thecurrent value of the portfolio. However, if the portfolio value is more or less than aspecified value make adjustments to the percentage withdrawn accordingly. Inother words, the initial value is adjusted without “consulting” the current value ofthe portfolio on a year by year basis unless that value triggers an adjustment.17. What makes most sense?a. <strong>The</strong> “triggered adjustment” method described in “d” above reflects the latestand best thinking on the topic because it allows a higher initial withdrawalrate (approximately 5.5% depending on the circumstances). In the majority ofcircumstances the higher potential withdrawal rate gives clients a more realisticchance to continue their preretirement standard of living throughout retirement.<strong>The</strong> lower 4 percent rate leaves clients with almost there entire principal in manycases. With affluent clients this may be desirable. However, for client’s trying tosqueeze their assets as tightly as possible to provide retirement income this resultmay not be desirable. In other words, if the goal is to get the most realistic streamof income that supports a desired lifestyle, then a system that leaves most of theprincipal is likely to short-change the income stream. Higher withdrawal rates (insome cases above the 5.5 percent rate) are therefore necessary and desirable.Recall that in the video Professor Milevsky indicated withdrawal rates up to 7.5%are possible in a good economy if the portfolio is smartly invested.b. But what about longevity protection? After all, the value of the initial Bengenresearch (first a 4%, then 4.5% withdrawal rates) was that the portfolio wasfail-safe for 30 years. After all, clients want their assets to provide an incomestream for 30 years or more. This is where the triggered withdrawal adjustmentscome in. In Guyton’s research (discussed in Competency 7 of this course), a policyis implemented that acts like guardrails to keep the portfolio on track to last for the30 years (or whatever duration is used). If the market goes down dramatically,the client will be asked to cut back on withdrawals. This is a natural and desiredconsequence of a down market anyway! <strong>The</strong> trigger will ensure assets last for the“duration” but not at the expense of starving the client in the current year.18. Example: Fred and Ethel have a $1,000,000 portfolio and are comfortable with a 6percent withdrawal rate, which they will adjust if a market trigger occurs. In year one, theytake $60,000 ($1,000,000 x .06). Inflation over year one was 4 percent, so in year two,they will take $62,400 ($60,000 x 1.04). <strong>The</strong> next year brings 3 percent inflation so theydraw down $64,272 ($62,400 x 1.03). In the next year, a trigger event occurs because6.12
- Page 1:
Huebner School SeriesHS 353 STUDY O
- Page 6:
THEAMERICANCOLLEGE.EDUThrough The A
- Page 10 and 11:
c. But it is more comprehensive bec
- Page 12 and 13:
(3) Work part-time during retiremen
- Page 14 and 15:
SECTION 2: UNDERSTANDING RETIREMENT
- Page 16:
d. Solutions(1) The model considers
- Page 19 and 20:
. Other sources of retirement incom
- Page 21 and 22:
c. Another option for solving cash
- Page 23 and 24:
(b) Net worth statements that ident
- Page 25 and 26:
d. Be ready to reengage with the cl
- Page 27 and 28:
(b) In financial planning(c) In inv
- Page 29 and 30:
j. Planning Point: Planners can use
- Page 31 and 32:
e. We also need them to have a bett
- Page 33 and 34:
Assignment 2IDENTIFY RETIREMENT INC
- Page 35 and 36:
(2) Income4. Determining risk toler
- Page 37 and 38:
collaborative experience which focu
- Page 39 and 40:
6. Asset allocation and risk tolera
- Page 41 and 42:
c. How long will the income last?d.
- Page 43 and 44:
. Durationc. Reliabilityd. Other6.
- Page 45 and 46:
c. Supplemental Security Income (SS
- Page 47 and 48:
. An unused emergency fund can supp
- Page 49 and 50:
5. Inflation(2) The expense method
- Page 51 and 52:
Assignment 3CHOOSE APPROPRIATE STRA
- Page 53 and 54:
. Save as a percentage of income an
- Page 55 and 56:
(1) Note that 38% of second income
- Page 57 and 58:
(4) The AARP website has a national
- Page 59 and 60:
4. Contributions to IRAs and Roth I
- Page 61 and 62:
carve out the nondeductible contrib
- Page 63 and 64:
(2) Plus salary deferrals (for an i
- Page 65 and 66:
a. Example:(1) Save $10,000 in 25%
- Page 67 and 68:
(a) This requires knowing four fact
- Page 69 and 70:
. Solution(1) Li and Lin Lin are bo
- Page 71 and 72:
(1) The increase in dollar amounts
- Page 73 and 74:
9. In some circumstances, an indivi
- Page 75 and 76:
2. Reverse mortgage basicsa. Almost
- Page 77 and 78:
5. Planning considerations(b) Keep
- Page 79 and 80:
(2) Some funds that are promoted as
- Page 81 and 82:
(1) Berstresser, Chalmers, and Tufa
- Page 83 and 84:
RESOURCES FOR COMPETENCY 3: CHOOSE
- Page 85 and 86:
(2) From the previous employer(s) p
- Page 87 and 88:
8. IRA funded plans (IRAs, SEPs, SI
- Page 89 and 90:
. Does the distribution election fi
- Page 91 and 92:
6. Net unrealized appreciation rule
- Page 93 and 94:
a. Tax-exempt plans include Roth IR
- Page 96 and 97:
8. Calculating required distributio
- Page 98 and 99:
(2) Exception: If there are separat
- Page 100 and 101:
5. Impactc. Tax rates are low in ea
- Page 102 and 103:
(7) Based on ordering rules, identi
- Page 104 and 105:
7. A married couple who file jointl
- Page 106 and 107:
(1) Needed to provide the appropria
- Page 108 and 109:
13. Transfers at deatha. Wills(2) A
- Page 110 and 111:
(1) The Retirement Equity Act manda
- Page 112 and 113:
(2) Beneficiary designation of bene
- Page 114 and 115:
13. Overview14. Types(2) The donor
- Page 116 and 117:
(1) Charity needs only to payout in
- Page 118 and 119:
c. Access should be granted to an a
- Page 120 and 121:
nightmare of living probate might h
- Page 122 and 123:
(6) Powers to represent their princ
- Page 124 and 125:
c. If the policy is term coverage w
- Page 126 and 127: e. Factoring personal and family he
- Page 128 and 129: problem. On the other hand, we can
- Page 130 and 131: d. Adding a cost of living adjustme
- Page 132 and 133: g. Planning Point: Sometimes a high
- Page 134 and 135: (2) Clients may not be able to “a
- Page 136 and 137: c. Ensure that the client is receiv
- Page 138 and 139: a. Example: Because of physical and
- Page 140 and 141: options about where to get his/her
- Page 142 and 143: (2) Facilities, monthly fees, and s
- Page 144 and 145: 8. Other strategies that help to co
- Page 146 and 147: standard deviations of the returns
- Page 148 and 149: a collapse in the real estate marke
- Page 150 and 151: a. In a later competency we will di
- Page 152 and 153: years of service with the employer)
- Page 154 and 155: a. Planning Point: Planners should
- Page 156 and 157: (2) If you have locked in food, ren
- Page 158 and 159: (4) Loss-of-spouse risk—Deferred
- Page 160 and 161: (1) Excess withdrawal risk—The us
- Page 162 and 163: (5) Frailty risk—Managing assets
- Page 164 and 165: 7. Practice good career management:
- Page 166 and 167: Assignment 6CHOOSE APPROPRIATE STRA
- Page 168 and 169: c. Example: Chuck and Sarah divide
- Page 170 and 171: e. The bucket approach can be thoug
- Page 172 and 173: 3. Understanding systematic withdra
- Page 174 and 175: (1) The time horizon used in the ca
- Page 178 and 179: markets have declined by a specifie
- Page 180 and 181: (2) Annuities and long-term care an
- Page 182 and 183: anticipates ramping down her activi
- Page 184 and 185: c. Each of the three portfolios wil
- Page 186 and 187: SECTION 4: THE ESSENTIAL VERSUS DIS
- Page 188 and 189: d. Clients give up investment contr
- Page 190 and 191: geared toward long-term growth. Thi
- Page 192 and 193: . Trade-offs involve:(1) Irrevocabl
- Page 194 and 195: (1) Rate at which banks lend to the
- Page 196 and 197: . Dollar-denominated liabilities of
- Page 198 and 199: (a) Dividend taxed in year paid out
- Page 200 and 201: 4. Taxationtheir return generating
- Page 202 and 203: . Close ended(1) IPO style launch(2
- Page 204 and 205: (3) Tax control17. Conversations in
- Page 206 and 207: (3) Mutual funds provide lower cost
- Page 208 and 209: way to obtain increasing payments t
- Page 210 and 211: protection from the downside risk w
- Page 212 and 213: 6. Today’s annuitization rates ar
- Page 214 and 215: h. Planning Point: Markets are very
- Page 216 and 217: a. The client may not be clear abou
- Page 218 and 219: a. Problems with implementation are
- Page 220 and 221: c. Product solutions work together
- Page 222 and 223: (1) A problem is that if the client
- Page 224 and 225: (b) A traditional fund company(c) A
- Page 226 and 227:
d. Evelyn is in great health and he
- Page 228:
RESOURCES FOR COMPETENCY 7: INTEGRA