11.07.2015 Views

section 1 - The American College Online Learning Center

section 1 - The American College Online Learning Center

section 1 - The American College Online Learning Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

d. Clients give up investment control. If a client has confidence in their personalfinancial abilities, investing the floor amount may be a more desirable strategyfor their situation.e. <strong>The</strong> annuity may be redundant. After all, any client who receives Social Securityalready gets an inflation-adjusted annuity.f. Annuities may be overpriced. In addition, your client may be dissuaded fromannuitizing in today’s low interest rate environment.g. Some client’s see annuities as a longevity gamble where they believe they will notlive long enough to make back their initial investment.h. <strong>The</strong> irrevocable and absolute nature of the annuity could be responsible for aclient’s aversion to the product.SECTION 5: HOW THE APPROACHES MITIGATE RISKSLO 6-5-1: Analyze how the three strategies to create retirement incomeaffect retirement risks1. Longevity riska. Longevity risk is best addressed through the flooring strategy because of thereliance of this strategy on annuities.b. Systematic withdrawals and the bucket approaches can also be very good hedgesagainst longevity risk because:2. Excess withdrawal risk(1) In many cases, the systematic withdrawal approach has a large portfolioleft after a 30-year time horizon. This is not the case for a worst casescenario.(2) <strong>The</strong> 30-year time horizon can be adjusted to create a time frame thatexceeds any reasonable life expectancy expectation.(3) <strong>The</strong> bucket approach and the systematic withdrawal strategy allow assetsto grow and add wealth that can be used in the later stages of retirement.a. Excess withdrawal risk is best addressed through the flooring strategy because ofthe reliance of this strategy on annuities.b. Systematic withdrawal and the bucket approach can also be a very good hedgeagainst excess withdrawal risk because:3. Inflation risk(1) <strong>The</strong>se strategies control (but do not limit) the amount consumed each year.A client following the plan will generally eliminate excess withdrawal risk.A client who abandons the plan will do so at the sacrifice of exacerbatingexcess withdrawal risk.(2) <strong>The</strong> bucket approach and the systematic withdrawal strategy allow forgreater asset accumulation than an annuitized flooring strategy. <strong>The</strong>possibility for greater growth of assets may prove to be a greater hedgeagainst systematic withdrawals which block excess consumption (basedon annuitization) if the assets grow sufficiently to produce additionalincome for the later retirement period.6.23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!