Feed Peas in diets for shrimp tilapia and milkfish - Northern Pulse ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 4Mean initial weight and total length, gain in weight and length, FCR and PER of tilapia (CLSUstrain) fed diets containing feed peas at varying plant protein substitution for 12 weeks(experiment 2) aPlant protein Dietary feed Body weight (g) Total length (cm)substitution (%) peas (%) Initial Gain Initial GainFCR PER0 0 28.0+3.0 53.6+12.8 11.6+0.1 4.7+1.4 3.4+0.6 1.0+0.25 5.9 28.2+2.8 57.4+12.4 11.6+0.3 5.0+0.2 3.2+0.4 1.0+0.110 11.7 28.5+3.2 49.5+ 7.2 11.5+0.2 5.1+0.6 3.6+0.4 0.9+0.115 17.6 28.3+2.9 57.1+ 8.5 11.7+0.2 5.2+0.9 3.3+0.3 1.0+0.120 23.4 28.5+2.6 56.7+ 2.1 11.7+0.2 5.1+0.3 3.3+0.3 1.0+0.125 29.3 28.4+3.2 45.5+ 7.8 11.7+0.1 4.6+0.4 4.0+0.4 0.9+0.130 35.2 28.4+3.0 54.0+ 0.7 11.6+0.2 5.1+0.2 3.5+0.2 0.9+0.035 41 28.1+2.4 56.7+13.5 11.5+0.1 5.4+1.0 3.4+0.6 1.0+0.2a Column means are not significantly different from each other (P>0.05). Mean+SEMTable 5Mean initial weight and total length, gain in weight and length, FCR and PER of male tilapia (BFARstrain) fed diets containing feed peas at varying plant protein substitution for 12 weeks(experiment 2) aPlant protein Dietary feed Body weight (g) Total length (cm)substitution 0.80 peas (%) Initial Gain Initial GainFCR PER0 0 31.1+4.3 52.5+4.4 12.1+0.6 5.0+0.6 4.3+0.4 0.8+0.15 5.9 31.0+3.6 71.6+22 12.1+0.5 5.8+0.8 3.3+0.6 0.9+0.210 11.7 30.9+4.3 60.2+0.7 12.1+0.6 5.0+0.4 3.6+0.2 0.8+0.015 17.6 30.9+4.3 69.0+11.5 12.1+0.5 4.8+1.5 3.7+0.6 0.9+0.220 23.4 30.8+3.9 62.4+10 12.2+0.6 5.1+0.3 3.6+0.5 0.9+0.125 29.3 30.9+3.6 57.0+5.9 12.1+0.5 5.2+0.8 3.6+0.1 0.9+0.030 35.2 31.0+3.8 63.9+1.3 12.1+0.4 5.1+0.3 3.8+0.1 0.8+0.035 41 31.1+4.5 74.1+9.2 12.1+0.6 5.7+0.7 3.2+0.1 1.0+0.0a Column means are not significantly different from each other (P>0.05). Mean+SEMTable 6 Carcass protein and ash of Nile tilapia after 9 weeks of feeding using some diets in experiment 1and after 12 weeks of feeding in experiment 2 aDietDiets in Expt 1Dietary feedpeas (%)% fishmeal protein substitutionCrudeproteinAshLipid0 - 56.5± 0.2 a 18.9± 0.1 b 18.8±0.3 b10 12.7 56.4± 0.6 a 19.5± 0.3 b 19.4±0.0 a30 37.5 57.2+0.4 a 20.8+0.4 a 18.7±0.0 b50 63.3 57.4+0.2 a 20.8+0.1 a 18.9±0.1 bDiets in Expt 2 b% plant protein substitutionDry matter basis (%)0 - 55.7+0.4 c 16.3+0.6 b 23.2±0.4 a15 17.6 59.1+0.4 a 14.7+0.2 c 21.2±0.3 b25 29.3 56.5+0.2 c 16.3+0.3 b 20.9±0.3 b35 41.0 58.2+0.2 b 18.3+0.0 a 20.3±0.1 baFor each experiment, column means with a common superscript are notsignificantly different (P>0.05).bAt stocking of the CLSU tilapia strain, body protein was 58.7+0.5%; ash,26.0+0%; lipid, 11.3+0.2%.17
Table 7Apparent dry matter digestibility (ADMD) and protein digestibility (APD) of diets with peas injuvenile male tilapia (CLSU strain)DigestibilitytrialsDietary feedpeas (%)Trial using diets in Expt 1% fishmeal protein substitutionADMD (%) aAPD (%) a0 0 72.1± 0.6 c 92.5± 0.4 a10 12.7 75.6± 0.4 b 90.5± 0.4 b30 37.5 77.8+1.1 ab 91.5+0.7 ab50 63.3 78.8+0.6 a 92.0+0.2 abTrial using diets in Expt 2% plant protein substitution0 0 74.1+0.2 b 90.6+0.3 a15 17.6 73.4+0.59 b 91.5+0.3 a25 29.3 76.2+0.67 a 91.2+0.3 a35 41 76.9+0.42 a 91.6+0.3 aa For each digestibility trial, column means with a commonsuperscript are not significantly different (P>0.05).Table 8Digestibility coefficients (%) for P. sativum in different fish speciesFish Dry matter Protein Energy ReferenceRainbow trout, 52 g 66.1 80.4 59.2 Gomes et al. (1995)Rainbow trout, 100g 66.3 87.9 68.9 Burel et al. (2000)Turbot, 110 g 71.5 92.9 77.7 Burel et al. (2000)Silver perch 51.0 81.0 51.0 Allan et al. (2000)Nile tilapia, 38 g 69.3 87.2 no data present studyAcknowledgementsThis study was funded by the US Department of Agriculture and sponsored by the USA Dry Pea and LentilCouncil. Feeds and fish samples were analyzed by the staff of the Central Analytical Laboratory ofSEAFDEC AQD, Tigbauan, Iloilo or the Animal Nutrition Analytical Service Laboratory, University of thePhilippines Los Baños, Laguna.ReferencesAllan, G.L., Parkinson, S., Booth, M.A., Stone, D.A.J, Rowland S.J., Frances, J., Warner-Smith, R., 2000. Replacement of fish meal indiets for Australian silver perch, Bidyanus bidyanus: 1. Digestibility of alternative ingredients. Aquaculture 186, 293-310.Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. AOAC, Arlington, VA, 1228 pp.Bond, D.A., Duc, G., 1993. Plant breeding as a means of reducing antinutritional factors in grain legumes. In: van der Poel, A.F.B.,Huisman, J., Saini, H.S. (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Antinutritional Factors (ANFs) in Legume Seeds, RecentAdvances of Research in Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds, 1-2 December 1993, EAAP Publication, The Netherlands, pp.379-396.Burel C., Boujard, T., Tulli, F., Kaushik, S.J., 2000. Digestibility of extruded peas, extruded lupin, and rapeseed meal in rainbow trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss) and turbot (Psetta maxima). Aquaculture 188, 285-298.Carter, J.F., Bolin, D.W., Erikson, P., 1960. The evaluation of forages by the Agronomic “difference” method and chromogen chromicoxide “indicator” technique. N.D. Agric. Exp. Stn., Techn. Bull. 426, 55 pp.Carter, C.G., Hauler, R.C., 2000. Fish meal replacement by plant meals in extruded feeds for Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.Aquaculture 185, 299-311.Cho, C.Y., Slinger, S.J., Bayley, M.S., 1982. Bioenergetics of salmonid fishes: energy intake, expenditure and productivity. Comp.Biochem. Physiol. 73B, 25-41.De Silva, S.S., Keembiyahetty, C.N., Gunasekera, R.M., 1988. Plant ingredient substitutes in Oreochromis niloticus (L.) diets:Ingredient digestibility and effect of dietary protein content on digestibility. J. Aqua. Trop. 3, 127-138.El-Sayed, A.-F. M., 1999. Alternative dietary protein sources for farmed tilapia, Oreochromis spp. Aquaculture 179, 149-168.Eusebio, P., 1991. Effect of dehulling on the nutritive value of some leguminous seeds as protein sources for tiger prawn (Penaeusmonodon) juveniles. Aquaculture 99, 297-308.Eusebio, P.S., Coloso, R.M., 2000. Nutritional evaluation of various plant protein sources in diets for Asian sea bass Lates calcarifer.J. Appl. Ichthyol. 16, 56-60.Gerpacio, A.L., Castillo, L.S., 1979. Nutrient Composition of Some Philippine Feedstuffs. Technical Bulletin 21, Extension Division,Department of Animal Science, University of the Philippines at Los Baños, Philippines, 117 pp.Gomes, E.F., Rema, P., Kaushik, S.J., 1995. Replacement of fish meal by plant proteins in the diet of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchusmykiss): digestibility and growth performance. Aquaculture 130, 177-186.Gouveia, A., Oliva Teles, A., Gones, E., Rema, P., 1993. Effect of cooking/expansion of three legume seeds on growth and foodutilization by rainbow trout. In: Fish Nutrition in Practice, Biarritz (France), June 24-27, 1991. Ed. INRA, Paris (Les Colloques,no61), pp. 933-938.Gouveia A., Davies, S.J., 1998. Preliminary nutritional evaluation of pea seed meal (Pisum sativum) for juvenile European sea bass(Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquaculture 166, 311-320.18
Page 2 and 3: Final Project ReportTitle:Utilizati
Page 4 and 5: SUMMARYThis report summarizes the r
Page 6 and 7: Utilization Of Feed Pea, Pisum Sati
Page 8 and 9: were thawed and pooled prior to fre
Page 10 and 11: Table 3Composition of reference and
Page 12 and 13: Table 10Percent recovery of experim
Page 14 and 15: Feed Pea (Pisum Sativum) As An Alte
Page 16 and 17: Water temperature for the whole dur
Page 18 and 19: of competing protein sources. The d
Page 22 and 23: Hanley, F., 1987. The digestibility
Page 24 and 25: experimental diets are presented in
Page 26 and 27: The results of the digestibility tr
Page 28 and 29: Table 3Composition (g/100g diet) of
Page 30: USA Dry Pea& Lentil CouncilHead Off

Feed Peas in diets for shrimp tilapia and milkfish - Northern Pulse ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?