1943 - National Labor Relations Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix A. Statistical Tables 85Table 2.-Distribution of cases and workers involved in cases received during the fiscalyear 1943, by monthCases receivedMonthAllcasesNumber Percent of total Workers involvedUnfair laborpracticeCBSeSRepresentationcasesUnfair labarpracticecasesRepresenta.tin casesUnfair laborpracticeRepresents.casestion casesTotal 9,543 3,403 6,140 35.7 64.3 5, 806, 610 2, 229, 861July 937 383 554 40.9 59. 1 621,986 170, 087August 911 399 512 43.8 56.2 473,129 162,979September 807 318 489 39.4 60.6 443,729 170, 185October 718 254 464 35.4 64.6 489,217 177,985November 639 249 390 39.0 6L 0 252,809 906,651December 574 225 349 39.2 03.8 403,021 119,538January 734 291 443 39.6 60. 4 610,420 175, 552February 760 247 513 32.5 67.5 556,212 248,204March 915 288 627 31. 5 68. 5 447, 578 221,603April 918 282 636 30.7 69.3 604,145 202,829May 778 214 564 27.5 72.5 441,458 193,801June 852 253 599 29.7 70.3 862,915 177,727'In unfair labor practice cases "workers involved" are the number employed in the establishment wherethe case arises; in representation cases "workers involved" are the number in the "unit" for which thepetition is filed or the number in the "unit" found appropriate by the Board.Table 3.-Types of unfair labor practices alleged in charges received during the fiscalyear 1943 1Unfair labor practices allegedNumber ofeases showingspecificallegationsPercent oftotalSUBSECTIONS OF SEC. 8 OF THE ACTTotal 3,403 100.0424 1)12.5176 5.2_1,901 55.910 .31) 1)-508 14.9115 3.41; 2; (3429 .821197 6.81 2 3) 5)17 . 51) (3) 4) 5)5 .1g))(5RECAPITULATION3,4033372,25636756'For cases in which charges were amended after filing, the final or last amended charges are tabulatedInstead of original charges.106.09.966.31. 122. 2
86 Eighth Annual Report of the National Labor Relations BoardTable 4.-Distribution of cases received during the fiscal year 1943 and percentincreaseor decrease compared with the fiscal year 1942, by State,Number-of cases received in 1943Percent increase or decreasecompared with _1942Division and State 3 Unfair labor Representationpractice cases cases Unfair Repro.All labor sentacasespractice tion- Number Peroentof total Number 'Percent cases casesof total-New England 697 241 7.0 456 7.3 -16.0 -3.0Maine 48 12 .3 36 .6 -29.4 -2.7New Hampshire 39 8 .2 31 . 5 0 +29. 2Varmint 27 6 .2 21 .3 14.3 +75. 0Massachusetts 402 164 4.8 238 3.8 +4.5 -8.1Rhode Island 65 19 .6 46 .7 -45. 7 +2. 2Connecticut 116 32 .9 84 1.4 • -49.2 -9.7Middle Atlantic 2,258 795 23.4 1,463 23.6 -30.0 +1.6New York 1,103 408 12.0 695 11.2 -45.6 -10.9New Jersey 542 190 5.6 352 5.7 -22.4 +26.6Pennsylvania 613 197 5.8 416 6.7. -20.6 +8.9East North Central 2,781 922 27.0 1,859 29.9 -30.7 +5.9Ohio 838 301 8.8 537 8.7 -30.5 +16.0Indiana 323 114 3.3 209 ' 3.4 -32.5 +4.0Illinois 820 265 7.8 855 8.9 - -27.6 +7.4Michigan 626 176 5.2 450 7. 2 -35. 3 -5. 7Wisconsin 174 66 1.9 108 1.7 -26.7 +11.3West North Central 821 287 8.4 534 8.6 -37.7 -1.1Minnesota 170 59 1.7 111 1.8 -42.2 +18.8Iowa 124 40 1.2 84 1.3 -34.4 -3.4Missouri 345 128 3.8 - 217 3.5 -23.8 +10.7North Dakota. 10 4 .1 6 .1 +33.3 -14.3South Dakota 10 4 .1 . 6 .1 -81.0 -66.7Nebraska 54 12 .3 - 42 .7 -77.8 ' -30.0Karl MS 108 40 1.2 68 ' 1.1 -23.1 -11.7South Atlantic 854 379 11.2 475 7.7 -18.8 -3.8Delaware • 12 3 .1 9 .1 -66.7 -40.0Maryland 142 57 1.7 86 1.4 -49.6 -23.4District of Columbia_ 54. 22 .6 32 .5 -45.0 -39.6Virginia 137 56 • 1.6 81 1.3 -6.7 +2. 5West Virginia 148 ' 57 1.7 91 1.5 0 +40.0North Carolina 88 40 1.2 48 .8 +2.6 +29.7South Carolina 46 28 .8 18 .3 +33.3 •+20.0Georgia 108 63 1.9 45 .7 -25.9 -28.6Florida_ 119 53 1.6 66 1.1 +23.3 +17.9East South Central 483 176 5.2 307 4.9 -13.7 +39.5Kentucky 191 68 2.0 123 2.0 9.3 +95.2Tennessee 155 71 2.1 84 1.3. -18.4 15.2Alabama 99 zs .8 71 1.1 -20.0 +47.9Mississippi 38 9 .3 29 .5 +28.6 +190.0West South Central 433 177 , 5.2 256 4.1 -59.6 -28.5Arkansas - 57 23 .7 34 .5 -4.2 -43.3Louisiana 76 31 .9 45 .7 -40.4 -55.4Oklahoma 59 18 .5 -.41 .. .7 -52. 6 +17. 1Texas • 241 105 3. 1 136 2.2 -3. 7 -16.0See footnotes, P . 87-
Page 1 and 2:
EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORTOF THENATIONAL
Page 3 and 4:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDH. A.
Page 5 and 6:
4•
Page 8 and 9:
THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Page 10 and 11:
The N. L. R. B. in the War 3The War
Page 12 and 13:
The N. L. R. B. in the War 5closed.
Page 14 and 15:
The N. L. R. B. in the War 7current
Page 16 and 17:
The N. L. R. B. in the War 9involvi
Page 18 and 19:
The N. L. R. B. in the War 11secret
Page 20 and 21:
Organizational and Administrative D
Page 22 and 23:
Organizational and Administrative D
Page 24 and 25:
IIIA STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF CASES.
Page 26 and 27:
Statistical Analysis of Cases Filed
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
IN/THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT
Page 36 and 37:
The N. L. R. A. in Practice: Unfair
Page 38 and 39:
• LIBRARY• -.AL tABOR, A.T1Into
Page 40 and 41:
The N. L. R. A. in Practice: Unfair
Page 42 and 43: The N. L. R. A. in Practice: Unfair
Page 50 and 51: THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT IN
Page 52 and 53: The N. L. R. A. in Practice: Repres
Page 66 and 67: The N. L. R. A. in Practice: Jurisd
Page 68 and 69: Enforcement Litigation 61all interm
Page 70 and 71: Enforcement Litigation 63of the Boa
Page 72 and 73: Enforcement Litigation 65than to st
Page 74 and 75: Enforcement Litigation 67tively. Th
Page 76 and 77: Studies of the Results of Board Act
Page 78 and 79: Studies of the Results of Board Act
Page 80 and 81: Studies af the Results of Board Act
Page 82 and 83: New Statutory Functions Vested in t
Page 84 and 85: New Statutory Fund ions Vested in t
Page 90 and 91: APPENDIX ASTATISTICAL TABLESThe fol
Page 94 and 95: Appendix A. Statistical Tables 87Ta
Page 96 and 97: Appendix A. Statistical Tables 89Ta
Page 98 and 99: Table 8.-Disposition of unfair labo
Page 100 and 101: ,Dismissed, totalBefore hearingBy B
Page 102 and 103: Table 11.—Number of elections and
Page 104 and 105: Table 13.-Number of elections and p
Page 106 and 107: APPENDIX BLIST OF CASES HEARD DURIN
Page 108 and 109: Appendix B. List of Cases Heard Dur
Page 110 and 111: Onan, D. W., & Sons.O'Neil, J. E.,
Page 128 and 129: APPENDIX CLIST OF CASES IN WHICH TH
Page 130 and 131: Appendix C. Decisions Rendered Duri
Page 140 and 141: Appendix. C. Decisions Rendered Dur
Page 142 and 143:
Appendix C. Decisions Rendered Duri
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Borg-Warner CorpBrennan, P., CoBurn
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
APPENDIX DSUMMARY OF LITIGATION FOR
Page 172 and 173:
Appendix D. Summary of Litigation 1
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Appendix D. Summary of Litigation.
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Appendix D. Summary-of Litigation 1
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186:
Page 189 and 190:
APPENDIX ENATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
Page 191 and 192:
184 Eighth Annual Report of the Nat
Page 193 and 194:
1 86 Eighth:A nnual Report of the N
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
WAR LABOR DISPUTES ACT 1AN ACTRelat
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
APPENDIX FThese Rules and Regulatio
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
21 8 Eighth Annual Report of the Na
Page 225 and 226:
220 Eighth Annual Report of-the Nat
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241:
APPENDIX GREGIONAL OFFICESFirst Reg
Page 244 and 245:
Appendix G. Regional Offices 239emu
Page 246 and 247:
Appendix G. Regional Offices 241DIM
Page 248:
Appendix G. Regional Offices 243
Page 252 and 253:
Appendix G. Regional Offices 247
Page 254 and 255:
LIST OF TABLESTables Appearing in T
show all

1943 - National Labor Relations Board

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?