The SPM has <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report “Pupils requir<strong>in</strong>gspecial support…” charted <strong>the</strong> presence at special<strong>school</strong> of pupils who require a considerableamount of support (Hendar 2006). About 40%of pupils at special <strong>school</strong> were estimated to havesuch a degree of difficulties at <strong>school</strong> that <strong>the</strong>yrequired special support (Hendar 2006). In turn,<strong>the</strong> National Agency <strong>for</strong> Education states <strong>in</strong> aprogress report (Skoverket 2004b) that about athird of pupils at SPM’s regional special <strong>school</strong>shave disabilities <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>deaf</strong>ness.O<strong>the</strong>r sources state that as many as 40-60% ofhear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>impaired</strong> children may have additionaldifficulties, which affect <strong>the</strong> child’s development(Picard 2002;Konradsson & Järvholm 2004).This report presents goal fulfillment <strong>for</strong> pupilsat special <strong>school</strong> <strong>in</strong> comparison with <strong>deaf</strong> <strong>and</strong>hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>impaired</strong> pupils <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r types of <strong>school</strong>s<strong>and</strong> with children with normal hear<strong>in</strong>g. With<strong>the</strong> support of national <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational studies,<strong>the</strong> SPM concludes <strong>the</strong> report with an analysis<strong>and</strong> with proposals <strong>for</strong> measures to achieve bettergoal <strong>fulfilment</strong>; <strong>the</strong>se measures can benefit all<strong>deaf</strong> <strong>and</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>impaired</strong> pupils, not just thoseattend<strong>in</strong>g special <strong>school</strong>s.Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> course of this evaluation project,<strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of Education <strong>and</strong> Research hasconducted a number of surveys with<strong>in</strong> this field.The evaluation project has been able to take <strong>in</strong>toaccount <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g surveys:• Assignment regard<strong>in</strong>g review of <strong>the</strong> timetable<strong>for</strong> special <strong>school</strong> etc. [Uppdrag angåendeöversyn av timplanen för specialskolan m.m.](U2007/4930/S)• Review of <strong>the</strong> goals <strong>and</strong> follow-up systemsetc. at compulsory <strong>school</strong> [Översyn avgrundskolans mål- och uppföljn<strong>in</strong>gssystemm.m.] (Utredn<strong>in</strong>gen... 2007)• Special state <strong>school</strong>s – better conditions <strong>and</strong>clearer division of responsibility [Statligaspecialskolor – bättre förutsättn<strong>in</strong>gar ochtydligare ansvarsfördeln<strong>in</strong>g] (U2006/9245/S)• Directive to change <strong>the</strong> authority structure<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>school</strong> system [Uppdrag att förändramyndighetsstrukturen <strong>in</strong>om skolväsendet](Skolmyndighetsutredn<strong>in</strong>gen 2007)The <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>and</strong> project aimThe National Agency <strong>for</strong> Special Schools <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Deaf <strong>and</strong> Hard of Hear<strong>in</strong>g shall, <strong>in</strong> consultation with <strong>the</strong>National Agency <strong>for</strong> Education, analyse <strong>and</strong> report any differences <strong>in</strong> goal <strong>fulfilment</strong> between pupils at special<strong>school</strong> <strong>and</strong> pupils who are <strong>deaf</strong> or hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>impaired</strong> but who attend ano<strong>the</strong>r type of <strong>school</strong> (Regler<strong>in</strong>gsbrev2006).Consultation partnersThe project was carried out by <strong>the</strong> SPM. TheSPM’s steer<strong>in</strong>g group consisted of Greger Bååth,Signild Sal<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong> Bengt Danielsson. Theadm<strong>in</strong>istrator was Ola Hendar.The follow<strong>in</strong>g people were members of <strong>the</strong>work<strong>in</strong>g group <strong>for</strong>med between <strong>the</strong> NationalAgency <strong>for</strong> Education, <strong>the</strong> SIT <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> SPM:• Claes-Göran Aggebo (<strong>the</strong> National Agency<strong>for</strong> Education’s department <strong>for</strong> educational<strong>in</strong>spection)• Madelene Dahlborg (<strong>the</strong> NationalAgency <strong>for</strong> Education’s unit <strong>for</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>gdocuments)• Staffan Engström (<strong>the</strong> National Agency<strong>for</strong> Education’s department <strong>for</strong> educationalissues)• Mikael Henn<strong>in</strong>gsson (<strong>the</strong> National Agency<strong>for</strong> Education’s unit <strong>for</strong> educational statistics)• Eva Andåker The Swedish Institute <strong>for</strong>Special Needs Education (SIT)• Ola Hendar (SPM).14 <strong>Goal</strong> <strong>fulfilment</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>school</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>deaf</strong> <strong>and</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>impaired</strong>
The National Agency <strong>for</strong> Education has playedan important part <strong>in</strong> this evaluation project. TheSIT, through its work on support <strong>in</strong> issues ofspecial needs education, has been <strong>in</strong>vited to, <strong>and</strong>has participated <strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g group.Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> evaluation project, <strong>the</strong> SPM has alsobeen <strong>in</strong> contact with <strong>and</strong> has collected op<strong>in</strong>ionsregard<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> models from <strong>the</strong> SwedishAssociation of Local Authorities <strong>and</strong> Regions(SKL), <strong>the</strong> National Board of Health <strong>and</strong> Welfare<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish Data Inspection Board. TWhen def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> assur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> target group,cooperation has taken place with Radi Jönsson,consultant, Sahlgrenska University Hospital,Go<strong>the</strong>nburg, <strong>and</strong> Jan Grenner, consultant, LundUniversity Hospital.There has also been cooperation with <strong>school</strong>heads with regard to collection of gradesfrom six of <strong>the</strong> seven <strong>school</strong>s <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g<strong>impaired</strong>. The <strong>school</strong>s <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>impaired</strong>participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grade analysis wereKannebäcks School, Alviks School, Söder School,Silvia School, Sol<strong>and</strong>er School <strong>and</strong> Park School.Nya Bro School <strong>in</strong> Stockholm chose not toparticipate.When draw<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>the</strong> questionnaires,reference has been made to experience fromprevious Swedish studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field. On <strong>the</strong>basis of <strong>the</strong>se contacts, op<strong>in</strong>ions have beencollected from <strong>the</strong> Institute <strong>for</strong> Special NeedsEducation, <strong>the</strong> University of Stockholm, <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> Teacher Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Programme at MalmöUniversity. Several parents <strong>and</strong> teachers have alsocontributed <strong>the</strong>ir views on <strong>the</strong> questionnaires.Statistics Sweden, on behalf of <strong>the</strong> SPM,per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>the</strong> task of send<strong>in</strong>g out questionnaires<strong>and</strong> compil<strong>in</strong>g data <strong>and</strong> grades.User organizations <strong>for</strong> Deaf, Hard of hear<strong>in</strong>gpeople <strong>and</strong> parents were contacted <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med, <strong>and</strong> ideas were ga<strong>the</strong>red from severalof <strong>the</strong>m.Oddvar Hjulstadt, Oslo University, generously<strong>in</strong>terpreted certa<strong>in</strong> results <strong>and</strong> contributedvaluable reference data. Magnus Järvholm,consultant at <strong>the</strong> Ear, Nose <strong>and</strong> Throat Cl<strong>in</strong>ic atVäxjö Central Hospital, has been a great help <strong>in</strong>assess<strong>in</strong>g hear<strong>in</strong>g data.Hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>impaired</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>deaf</strong> pupilsEach year about 1‐4 children per thous<strong>and</strong>are born with hear<strong>in</strong>g impairments thatrequire habilitation (Van Naarden, Decouflé& Caldwell 1999; Andersson 2002; NCHAM2003; Parv<strong>in</strong>g, Hauch & Christensen 2003;Statens beredn<strong>in</strong>g… 2004 Statens beredn<strong>in</strong>g…2006). Habilitation requirements refer here tosome <strong>for</strong>m of technical assistive hear<strong>in</strong>g device(hear<strong>in</strong>g aids <strong>and</strong> cochlear implants) or signlanguage tuition (Statens beredn<strong>in</strong>g… 2006).The degree of hear<strong>in</strong>g loss a child must have <strong>in</strong>order to be deemed to require habilitation variesbetween countries <strong>and</strong> with<strong>in</strong> countries. If <strong>the</strong>agreed hear<strong>in</strong>g loss, measured <strong>in</strong> dB, is low,<strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> group <strong>in</strong>creases, whereas if <strong>the</strong>loss is high, <strong>the</strong> number of children decreases(NCHAM 2003). The type, degree <strong>and</strong> reason<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g loss can vary considerably with<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> group (Van Naarden, Decouflé & Caldwell1999; Parv<strong>in</strong>g, Hauch & Christensen 2003,Konradsson & Järvholm 2004). If a certa<strong>in</strong>number of children are born with a hear<strong>in</strong>gloss that requires habilitation, this number isestimated to have doubled by <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong>y start<strong>school</strong> (Fortnum, Stacey & Summerfield 2006).There are pupils at <strong>school</strong> who have similar typesof hear<strong>in</strong>g loss but who have different types ofassistive devices. For this reason, children with<strong>the</strong> same type of hear<strong>in</strong>g loss can be <strong>in</strong> need ofcompletely different types of support at <strong>school</strong>.Moreover, children, parents <strong>and</strong> <strong>school</strong>s can allexperience <strong>and</strong> perceive hear<strong>in</strong>g loss <strong>in</strong> differentways. This contributes to <strong>the</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> of support <strong>in</strong> <strong>school</strong>.<strong>Goal</strong> <strong>fulfilment</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>school</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>deaf</strong> <strong>and</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>impaired</strong>15
- Page 2 and 3: This is a translation of main parts
- Page 4 and 5: Goal fulfilment in school for the d
- Page 6 and 7: Table of Contents, contd.Concluding
- Page 8 and 9: Abbreviations and terms 1SPMSVSITTh
- Page 10 and 11: The Swedish Compulsory SchoolCompul
- Page 12 and 13: of teaching in different subjects,
- Page 16 and 17: In addition to the variation in typ
- Page 18 and 19: Attitudes to sign language, long re
- Page 20 and 21: Compulsory school for pupils withle
- Page 22 and 23: In 2007, the SPM reported to the Mi
- Page 24 and 25: impaired pupils’ reading levels i
- Page 26 and 27: Method and implementationMethodPrev
- Page 28 and 29: Figure 1. Flow chart of the collect
- Page 30 and 31: 3,503,002,50Prevalence2,001,501,000
- Page 32 and 33: Table 7. Distribution of responses
- Page 34 and 35: ResultsTypes of schoolsSchools in S
- Page 36 and 37: 100908070Procent60504030Mild hearin
- Page 38 and 39: the 16 best grades in a pupil’s l
- Page 40 and 41: Table 10. The proportion (%) of pup
- Page 42 and 43: Table 14. Proportion (%) of boys aw
- Page 44 and 45: EnglishThe goals for the learning E
- Page 46 and 47: Table 22. Proportion (%) of pupils
- Page 48 and 49: It is also important to note that t
- Page 50 and 51: Table 26. Proportion (%) in respect
- Page 52 and 53: TeachersParents91878176 76726564Per
- Page 54 and 55: other types have used spoken langua
- Page 56 and 57: On the basis of the assessment resu
- Page 58 and 59: For instance, it can be mentioned t
- Page 60 and 61: Special Schools for the Deaf and Ha
- Page 62 and 63: LiteratureUnpublished sourcesConiav
- Page 64 and 65:
Specialskolemyndigheten. . Hämtad
- Page 66 and 67:
se>. Välj rubrik “Publikationer
- Page 68 and 69:
Appendice I1II. Compulsory School (
- Page 70 and 71:
Appendice IVIV. Special school for
- Page 72:
The National Agency for Special Nee