The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris
The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris
The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
h -1 and none showed any sign of resting on the<br />
sea en route.<br />
A number of different approaches have been<br />
made to estimate the energetic costs of flights for<br />
birds of different sizes. <strong>The</strong> simplest approaches<br />
have been those methods, which use crude estimations<br />
of the energetic costs of flight. Based on<br />
simple energetic formulae, it is possible to estimate<br />
the costs of flight to Iceland from Wexford.<br />
Given that many Wexford wintering birds stage<br />
at Hvanneyri in western Iceland (MS27), the distance<br />
between these two areas (1,500 km) was<br />
used to calculate the minimum flight range necessary<br />
for geese to reach their staging site. <strong>The</strong><br />
still-air flight-range estimation methods of<br />
McNeil & Cadieux (1972), Summers & Waltner<br />
(1978), Greenewalt (1975) and Davidson (1984)<br />
were used to back-calculate the minimum fat<br />
stores necessary to sustain flight over that distance.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se were used to generate a range of different<br />
speeds for a female of departing lean body<br />
mass 2.3 kg and a male of 2.6 kg (see Table 3.1).<br />
Given the observed ground speeds of 50-90 km<br />
h -1 observed amongst satellite tagged geese making<br />
this journey, a range of values were obtained<br />
for these observed speeds. <strong>The</strong>se suggest that<br />
males require between 145 and 292 g of fat and<br />
females 130-272 g fat to fuel the passage from<br />
Wexford to Hvanneyri.<br />
A more sophisticated method is to attempt to<br />
model the birds rate of use of fuel, based on the<br />
mechanical work the organism must do, given its<br />
morphology and the conditions of flight. This is<br />
the aerodynamic approach of Pennycuick (1989),<br />
which makes several assumptions about the<br />
physiology of flight, but nevertheless provides the<br />
best predictive model available at the present. <strong>The</strong><br />
most recent version of his software (Flight.bas<br />
version 1999) was used which incorporates findings<br />
from recent wind tunnel studies which suggest<br />
that even for a large birds like a goose, the<br />
coefficient of body drag (C db ) is lower than previously<br />
thought (Pennycuick et al. 1996). In the<br />
present analysis, the suggested lower value (C db<br />
= 0.10) was used instead of 0.25 (see also Green &<br />
Alerstam 2000). <strong>The</strong> results are shown in Figure<br />
3.5, showing the range of flight range estimates<br />
for a female of lean body mass 2.3 kg and male of<br />
lean body mass 2.6 kg, the 1500 km flight necessitating<br />
340g and 349g of fat for the male and female<br />
respectively. Both calculations make the assumption<br />
that the geese fly at maximum range<br />
speed, which was 99 and 103 km/hr respectively.<br />
Flight range burning fat only (km)<br />
At lower speeds, for the same total energy expenditure,<br />
the flight range estimate would be reduced<br />
(Figure 3.6).<br />
Despite considerable monitoring efforts, it is clear<br />
that we still know very little about the prelude to<br />
departure of the geese from their wintering<br />
grounds in spring. All of the data presented above<br />
derive from the main Irish wintering site, and<br />
nothing is known from wintering sites elsewhere.<br />
Satellite telemetry (MS20) showed that in a spring<br />
when a relatively early departure occurred from<br />
Wexford, at least one of the early departing birds<br />
fitted with a transmitter left Wexford on 10 April<br />
1997, but staged on the northern Ireland coast<br />
until 16 April before departing for Iceland. Such<br />
spring staging within Ireland may be simply due<br />
to birds responding to initial cues, which suggested<br />
that weather conditions were favourable<br />
for migration, only to encounter unfavourable<br />
conditions later on. Resightings of Wexford-wintering<br />
birds seen soon after spring departure on<br />
Flight range (km)<br />
1800<br />
1600<br />
1400<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45<br />
Fat deposits at departure (kg)<br />
Figure 3.5. <strong>The</strong>oretical flight range estimates for male<br />
and female <strong>Greenland</strong> <strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong> Geese of lean<br />
body mass 2.6 and 2.3 kg respectively, given different<br />
fat loads at point of departure based on Pennycuick<br />
models (see text for details).<br />
1700<br />
1600<br />
1500<br />
1400<br />
1300<br />
1200<br />
1100<br />
Male lean mass 2.6 kg<br />
Female lean mass 2.3 kg<br />
1000<br />
50 60 70 80 90 100 110<br />
Flight speed (km/hr)<br />
Figure 3.6. Effects of differences in flight speed on the<br />
theoretical flight range of <strong>Greenland</strong> <strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong><br />
Geese.<br />
31