27.11.2012 Views

The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris

The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris

The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mean age of first breeding<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996<br />

Cohort year<br />

Figure 6.7. Mean age of first successful breeding (+ SE,<br />

determined by the return of an individual to the wintering<br />

grounds with at least one gosling) of goslings<br />

captured and marked in their first winter at Wexford<br />

since ringing commenced in 1983. Note that there are<br />

still several surviving birds from cohorts hatched since<br />

1992 that have yet to breed and could yet recruit in<br />

future years, although these would only raise the mean<br />

age of first breeding for these latter cohorts.<br />

of survivors of cohorts from 1988 onwards (Figure<br />

6.7) will increase mean age at first breeding<br />

and make very little proportional difference to the<br />

proportions breeding shown in Figure 6.6.<br />

Mean brood size amongst <strong>flavirostris</strong> has always<br />

been relatively high compared to other <strong>White</strong><strong>fronted</strong><br />

<strong>Goose</strong> races, varying between 2.4 and 4.2<br />

at both Wexford (mean 3.4 ± 0.07 SE) and Islay<br />

(mean 3.1 ± 0.07 SE) during the years 1968-1999.<br />

Mean brood size at Wexford was highly significantly<br />

correlated with proportion of young in<br />

winter, but there was no such relationship on Islay.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was a tendency for larger broods with<br />

increasing age of first breeding (MS8). This suggests<br />

that there could be some reproductive benefit<br />

to the individual from prolonged association<br />

with parents (in terms of production of young at<br />

their first breeding attempt). <strong>The</strong>re has been a<br />

sudden increase in brood size amongst birds wintering<br />

on Islay in very recent seasons, despite no<br />

change in the observer or methods used to sample<br />

this parameter there (Figure 6.8). This has resulted<br />

in the mean brood size on Islay exceeding<br />

that at Wexford (generally always the converse<br />

until the mid-1990s, Figure 6.8). While in the 1970s<br />

and 1980s the productivity of the Wexford birds<br />

was nearly always greater than that of Islay wintering<br />

birds, in recent years this difference has<br />

reduced, and Islay productivity has in several<br />

recent years exceeded that at Wexford. Evidence<br />

for any density-dependent relationship for productivity<br />

was weak amongst the Scottish wintering<br />

flocks (Pettifor et al. 1999) and non-existent<br />

Mean brood size<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1960 1970 1980<br />

Census year<br />

1990 2000<br />

Wexford<br />

Islay<br />

Wexford<br />

Islay<br />

Figure 6.8. Mean annual brood size of <strong>Greenland</strong><br />

<strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong> Geese returning to the two major wintering<br />

areas of Wexford and Islay. <strong>The</strong> vertical arrow<br />

indicates the point at which the population was protected<br />

from hunting on the wintering grounds (i.e. at<br />

both sites). <strong>The</strong> decline in brood size at Wexford since<br />

1983 is statistically significant, as is the significant increase<br />

on Islay 9 .<br />

amongst the Wexford wintering element of the<br />

population.<br />

6.6 What does limit reproduction in this<br />

population?<br />

We may be very encouraged that recent years<br />

have seen a huge increase in the basic descriptive<br />

knowledge relating to the breeding biology<br />

and ecology of <strong>Greenland</strong> <strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong> Geese.<br />

However, from a conservation point of view, all<br />

the descriptive information is useless if we are<br />

unable to identify and understand the processes<br />

involved. Direct comparisons with other <strong>White</strong><strong>fronted</strong><br />

<strong>Goose</strong> races show that proportionally<br />

fewer <strong>flavirostris</strong> of potential breeding age return<br />

to the wintering areas with young. Yet when they<br />

do breed, they return with more juvenile geese<br />

per family than those of other races (see comparisons<br />

in Table 6.1). <strong>The</strong> implication is that the reproductive<br />

potential of the population is locked<br />

up in a small number of highly successful breeding<br />

pairs. <strong>The</strong> question therefore remains: why<br />

do so few females of breeding age return with<br />

young? And why is this number presently declining?<br />

Is it because of delayed pairing (and prolonged<br />

parent offspring associations) compared<br />

to other races (MS8, MS11)? Do offspring simply<br />

associate with parents and siblings because they<br />

can contribute to the reproductive output of kin<br />

and accumulate reproductive knowledge during<br />

a period when they have little prospect of breeding<br />

successfully? Or do they pair no later than<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!