The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris
The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris
The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5 Pre-nesting feeding<br />
5.1 Introduction<br />
Lack (1968) was the first to suggest that laying<br />
dates, clutch size and chick growth rates were coadapted<br />
in birds to ensure maximum fitness. Laying<br />
date is important, since in most studied goose<br />
populations, goslings hatching earlier have a<br />
higher probability of survival and recruitment<br />
than those hatching later (e.g. Cooke et al. 1984,<br />
Warren 1990). Female geese in good body condition<br />
generally lay larger clutches and fledge more<br />
young than females in poorer condition (Ankney<br />
& MacInnes 1978, Ebbinge et al. 1982, Ebbinge<br />
1989, Prop & Deerenberg 1991, Johnson & Sibly<br />
1993, Warren 1994, Ebbinge & Spaans 1995).<br />
Hence, there is considerable evidence to support<br />
the idea that the ability of a female to accumulate<br />
nutrient stores at the earliest stage prior to the<br />
onset of breeding has a considerable influence on<br />
her ability to reproduce successfully in a given<br />
year.<br />
For many years, it was considered that most arctic<br />
nesting geese built up stores on the wintering<br />
grounds, supplementing body condition at one<br />
or more staging area on spring migration before<br />
they reached the breeding areas. In the 1970s, the<br />
weight of evidence suggested that most arctic<br />
nesting geese bred immediately on arrival, or very<br />
shortly after arrival, on their northern breeding<br />
areas (generally as soon as nest sites were freed<br />
from snow cover). <strong>The</strong>refore, it was naturally assumed<br />
that the internal nutrient stores remaining<br />
on arrival to the nesting grounds were of considerable<br />
importance in determining reproductive<br />
success (Barry 1962, Ryder 1970, Newton<br />
1977, Ankney & MacInnes 1978). However, it has<br />
always been apparent that any supplement to the<br />
reserves of a female goose on arrival at the breeding<br />
grounds will maintain or improve her general<br />
nutrient status and increase her chances of<br />
reproductive success, as long as delay of first egg<br />
date after arrival carries no cost. <strong>The</strong>oretical considerations<br />
suggested that, for the Lesser Snow<br />
<strong>Goose</strong> <strong>Anser</strong> caerulescens caerulescens at least, the<br />
fat stores available on arrival were only sufficient<br />
to account for 46-70% of the lipid and 14-55% of<br />
the protein requirements for clutches of 3-6 eggs<br />
(Meijer & Drent 1999). From this standpoint, female<br />
geese arriving at the breeding grounds have<br />
to supplement stores with substantial amounts<br />
of dietary fat and protein in order to attempt reproduction<br />
at all.<br />
As more studies have been carried out, it has become<br />
more apparent that few arctic nesting goose<br />
populations were truly capital breeders, in the<br />
sense that all reproductive material invested in<br />
clutches were derived from stores accumulated<br />
by the female in areas remote from the breeding<br />
areas. It is now widely recognised that many populations<br />
exploit spring staging areas close to, but<br />
not necessarily at, ultimate breeding sites and<br />
hence have the potential to supplement stores<br />
after the main spring migration and prior to first<br />
egg date. Raveling (1978) was amongst the first<br />
to recognise that many species of northern or arctic-nesting<br />
goose regularly nested 10-13 days after<br />
arrival on breeding areas, the period required<br />
for rapid yolk development. This enables the female<br />
goose to modify her timing of first egg date<br />
and the investment in her clutch based on external<br />
(e.g. weather, nest site availability, e.g. Carriere<br />
et al. 1999) and internal conditions (e.g. extent of<br />
stores, see Ganter & Cooke 1996).<br />
It has since become clear that <strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong><br />
<strong>Goose</strong> populations in particular rely upon prenesting<br />
feeding on the nesting grounds to supplement<br />
stores for investment in reproduction<br />
(Ely & Raveling 1989, Budeau et al. 1991). Other<br />
species show the same response (e.g. the Lesser<br />
Snow <strong>Goose</strong>, Ganter & Cooke 1996) including the<br />
very high arctic Greater Snow <strong>Goose</strong> <strong>Anser</strong> caerulescens<br />
atlanticus, thought originally to breed soon<br />
after arrival on the nesting areas (Choiniére &<br />
Gauthier 1995).<br />
5.2Mechanisms for recouping body<br />
stores on the breeding grounds<br />
Amongst the first studies to demonstrate prolonged<br />
pre-nesting feeding on the breeding<br />
grounds was that of the <strong>Greenland</strong> <strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong><br />
<strong>Goose</strong> (MS1), where it was evident that geese fed<br />
locally for the period of at least 10 days between<br />
the first arrivals and the onset of breeding. Geese<br />
fed on the highly nutritious roots and stolons of<br />
Puccinellia deschampsioides, bulbils of Triglochin palustre<br />
and the lower stem of Eriophorum angustifolium<br />
and Carex spp., excavated from low altitude<br />
43