The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris
The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris
The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1980s. <strong>The</strong>y are now protected from hunting in<br />
Britain and Ireland (since 1982) and the season<br />
has been shortened to 16 August-30 April in<br />
<strong>Greenland</strong> (from 1985). Immediately following<br />
the implementation of protective legislation,<br />
numbers at the two most important wintering<br />
sites (Islay in the Inner Hebrides, SW Scotland<br />
and Wexford Slobs, SE Ireland) increased, suggesting<br />
that hunting was at least partially additive<br />
to overall natural losses. Observations of individually<br />
marked birds have shown that the<br />
population tends to be site loyal: only 14% of birds<br />
seen in consecutive winters changed site and 7%<br />
per annum showed permanent emigration (MS7,<br />
MS9, M. Frederickson unpublished data). Since<br />
hunting took place at both sites up to the time of<br />
protection, these cases offer an opportunity to<br />
explore the effects of changes in hunting legislation<br />
on the numbers using these sites. At Wexford,<br />
hunting was permitted again in the winters<br />
of 1985/86 and 1989/90. In this chapter, an attempt<br />
is made to determine the role hunting<br />
played in limiting numbers of <strong>Greenland</strong> <strong>White</strong><strong>fronted</strong><br />
Geese at Wexford, using census data and<br />
reviewing various different approaches to the<br />
estimation of annual survival in this population.<br />
8.2Were annual adult rates of return to<br />
Wexford related to the size of the<br />
annual kill?<br />
Counts of <strong>Greenland</strong> <strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong> Geese have<br />
been carried out at Islay and Wexford since at least<br />
the winter of 1967/68. Since 1982, carefully coordinated<br />
monthly counts have been carried out<br />
following a standard procedure at both sites (see<br />
Easterbee et al. 1990, Fox et al. 1994, MS14 for<br />
details). In years prior to this, up to 40 counts were<br />
carried out on Wexford Slobs in each winter, and<br />
at least two complete counts of Islay were undertaken<br />
annually. Large samples of birds have been<br />
aged in each autumn since 1968/69 to determine<br />
the proportions of first-winter birds present during<br />
early autumn or winter. It is important to<br />
understand whether the magnitude of the annual<br />
hunting kill was responsible for changes in the<br />
probability that a bird would return to either site<br />
in the following year.<br />
Based on the annual maximum count from each<br />
winter (N) and proportion of juveniles in the<br />
population J for each winter t, an assessment of<br />
apparent annual adult return rate R t for Wexford<br />
and Islay was determined as follows:<br />
66<br />
R t = (N t – J t N t )/N t-1<br />
(1)<br />
This measure includes the net balance of immigration/emigration<br />
of individuals to each site as<br />
well as true survival between years. Furthermore,<br />
the measure suffers from sequential bias, in that<br />
an overestimation of apparent survival in year t<br />
is compensated for by an underestimation in year<br />
t+1. However, as far as the numbers of geese returning<br />
to the site is concerned, this measure has<br />
some utility in determining the way in which local<br />
abundance at a site varies over time. It seems<br />
likely that changes in annual immigration/emigration<br />
rates are relatively small, and probably<br />
relatively constant, so that annual adult rate of<br />
return to a wintering resort represents a proxy<br />
measure of annual adult survival. Is it possible to<br />
detect a change in annual adult return rate that<br />
can be related to the number of birds killed in<br />
any one year? Although not evidence of directly<br />
additive mortality, such change would support<br />
the argument that hunting at a known level has<br />
an impact upon the probability of a bird returning<br />
to a wintering site in a subsequent year.<br />
At Wexford Slobs, the hunt was always limited<br />
in time and space, and the size of the bag determined<br />
for each year. Estimates of the numbers<br />
shot in Wexford Harbour were less precise, so<br />
annual totals killed there were estimated based<br />
on observations and discussions with wildfowlers<br />
in each season and these totals added to those<br />
killed at the Slobs. When the moratorium on<br />
shooting was lifted in 1985 and 1989, the bag was<br />
strictly limited and the numbers shot were recorded.<br />
In 1981/82-1983/84, a detailed study was<br />
undertaken to assess the level of mortality on the<br />
Wexford Slobs. Systematic (but not comprehensive)<br />
searches were carried out using a trained<br />
retriever dog on the Slobs and along the shores<br />
of Wexford harbour to find the bodies of unretrieved<br />
dead and dying geese. In 1981/82, when<br />
hunting took place, 28 geese were found in this<br />
way (in addition to the 142 reported shot), compared<br />
to none in following years with protection<br />
from shooting (D.W. Norriss in litt.). For this reason,<br />
in all years when hunting occurred, an additional<br />
20% was added to the known bag to allow<br />
for geese mortally wounded or not retrieved<br />
(based on general experience from many years<br />
and specific investigations during 1981/82). In<br />
this way, an annual kill was defined (K t ) for each<br />
year with hunting at Wexford. <strong>The</strong> number of<br />
birds killed K t was then expressed as a proportion<br />
of the maximum numbers recorded N t to give