27.11.2012 Views

The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris

The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris

The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1980s. <strong>The</strong>y are now protected from hunting in<br />

Britain and Ireland (since 1982) and the season<br />

has been shortened to 16 August-30 April in<br />

<strong>Greenland</strong> (from 1985). Immediately following<br />

the implementation of protective legislation,<br />

numbers at the two most important wintering<br />

sites (Islay in the Inner Hebrides, SW Scotland<br />

and Wexford Slobs, SE Ireland) increased, suggesting<br />

that hunting was at least partially additive<br />

to overall natural losses. Observations of individually<br />

marked birds have shown that the<br />

population tends to be site loyal: only 14% of birds<br />

seen in consecutive winters changed site and 7%<br />

per annum showed permanent emigration (MS7,<br />

MS9, M. Frederickson unpublished data). Since<br />

hunting took place at both sites up to the time of<br />

protection, these cases offer an opportunity to<br />

explore the effects of changes in hunting legislation<br />

on the numbers using these sites. At Wexford,<br />

hunting was permitted again in the winters<br />

of 1985/86 and 1989/90. In this chapter, an attempt<br />

is made to determine the role hunting<br />

played in limiting numbers of <strong>Greenland</strong> <strong>White</strong><strong>fronted</strong><br />

Geese at Wexford, using census data and<br />

reviewing various different approaches to the<br />

estimation of annual survival in this population.<br />

8.2Were annual adult rates of return to<br />

Wexford related to the size of the<br />

annual kill?<br />

Counts of <strong>Greenland</strong> <strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong> Geese have<br />

been carried out at Islay and Wexford since at least<br />

the winter of 1967/68. Since 1982, carefully coordinated<br />

monthly counts have been carried out<br />

following a standard procedure at both sites (see<br />

Easterbee et al. 1990, Fox et al. 1994, MS14 for<br />

details). In years prior to this, up to 40 counts were<br />

carried out on Wexford Slobs in each winter, and<br />

at least two complete counts of Islay were undertaken<br />

annually. Large samples of birds have been<br />

aged in each autumn since 1968/69 to determine<br />

the proportions of first-winter birds present during<br />

early autumn or winter. It is important to<br />

understand whether the magnitude of the annual<br />

hunting kill was responsible for changes in the<br />

probability that a bird would return to either site<br />

in the following year.<br />

Based on the annual maximum count from each<br />

winter (N) and proportion of juveniles in the<br />

population J for each winter t, an assessment of<br />

apparent annual adult return rate R t for Wexford<br />

and Islay was determined as follows:<br />

66<br />

R t = (N t – J t N t )/N t-1<br />

(1)<br />

This measure includes the net balance of immigration/emigration<br />

of individuals to each site as<br />

well as true survival between years. Furthermore,<br />

the measure suffers from sequential bias, in that<br />

an overestimation of apparent survival in year t<br />

is compensated for by an underestimation in year<br />

t+1. However, as far as the numbers of geese returning<br />

to the site is concerned, this measure has<br />

some utility in determining the way in which local<br />

abundance at a site varies over time. It seems<br />

likely that changes in annual immigration/emigration<br />

rates are relatively small, and probably<br />

relatively constant, so that annual adult rate of<br />

return to a wintering resort represents a proxy<br />

measure of annual adult survival. Is it possible to<br />

detect a change in annual adult return rate that<br />

can be related to the number of birds killed in<br />

any one year? Although not evidence of directly<br />

additive mortality, such change would support<br />

the argument that hunting at a known level has<br />

an impact upon the probability of a bird returning<br />

to a wintering site in a subsequent year.<br />

At Wexford Slobs, the hunt was always limited<br />

in time and space, and the size of the bag determined<br />

for each year. Estimates of the numbers<br />

shot in Wexford Harbour were less precise, so<br />

annual totals killed there were estimated based<br />

on observations and discussions with wildfowlers<br />

in each season and these totals added to those<br />

killed at the Slobs. When the moratorium on<br />

shooting was lifted in 1985 and 1989, the bag was<br />

strictly limited and the numbers shot were recorded.<br />

In 1981/82-1983/84, a detailed study was<br />

undertaken to assess the level of mortality on the<br />

Wexford Slobs. Systematic (but not comprehensive)<br />

searches were carried out using a trained<br />

retriever dog on the Slobs and along the shores<br />

of Wexford harbour to find the bodies of unretrieved<br />

dead and dying geese. In 1981/82, when<br />

hunting took place, 28 geese were found in this<br />

way (in addition to the 142 reported shot), compared<br />

to none in following years with protection<br />

from shooting (D.W. Norriss in litt.). For this reason,<br />

in all years when hunting occurred, an additional<br />

20% was added to the known bag to allow<br />

for geese mortally wounded or not retrieved<br />

(based on general experience from many years<br />

and specific investigations during 1981/82). In<br />

this way, an annual kill was defined (K t ) for each<br />

year with hunting at Wexford. <strong>The</strong> number of<br />

birds killed K t was then expressed as a proportion<br />

of the maximum numbers recorded N t to give

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!