FEASIBILITY_STUDY , item 14. PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and ...
FEASIBILITY_STUDY , item 14. PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and ...
FEASIBILITY_STUDY , item 14. PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A feasibility study prepared for the Black Box TrustNovember 2011Advantages cont…Help to increase the job security ofexisting venue staff <strong>and</strong> equipmentsuppliersDisadvantages cont…Potential delay in delivery offundingIncrease opportunities for staffdevelopment, as specific grants fortraining can be obtainedIncrease opportunities to movetowards becoming moresustainable, generating additionalincomeAdditional resource to programmemore performances <strong>and</strong> eventsThis option agrees with the key objectives of the Black Box going forward as it involvesfunding/investment in its operation going forward. The advantages of this option outweigh thedisadvantages <strong>and</strong> help to mitigate against the risk of not receiving funding.In our view, applying to additional sources of public sector funding <strong>and</strong> other relevant sources isthe preferred option for the continued existence of the Black Box.6.6 Preferred option <strong>and</strong> assessment of riskThe preferred option to „continue with public sector <strong>and</strong> other support‟ will have a number ofassociated risks <strong>and</strong> uncertainties that potentially will affect successful implementation. Thesehave been considered against the following headings:Lack of public fundingRestricted lendingCriteria of other funding sourcesCompetition for fundingLack of business case6.6.1 Lack of public fundingThe ACNI, BCC <strong>and</strong> DSD budgets have been cut significantly in light of the planned cuts inpublic spending over the next four years <strong>and</strong> may not be able to provide the same level offunding as provided to the Black Box in previous years.This is a major risk to the future operation of the venue as it requires this level of funding goingforward.49