12.07.2015 Views

(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 Bulletin 30 NOVEMBER 1, 2012Figure 5. Distribution <strong>of</strong> nine species <strong>of</strong> Doration. Type localities <strong>of</strong> the five new species are indicated by stars. Starsand dots show localities <strong>of</strong> material examined. Some dots represent more than one locality. <strong>Species</strong> are identifiedin legend on map. Map provided by Division <strong>of</strong> Fishes, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan Museum <strong>of</strong> Zoology and used <strong>with</strong>permission.it occurs in the Ouachita River below the Fall Line, lowerWhite River as far upstream as (and including) BuffaloRiver, Little Red River, Black River, St. Francis River, CastorRiver, and lowland drainage ditches <strong>of</strong> southeasternMissouri. To the east E. stigmaeum occurs in direct tributaries<strong>of</strong> the Mississippi River from southeastern Louisianato the Hatchie River in southwestern Tennessee. Inthe Tennessee drainage it occurs in Clarks River and JonathanCreek in western Kentucky, and Bear Creek in northwesternAlabama.Records <strong>of</strong> E. stigmaeum from the Sabine River systemin Louisiana could not be verified. The five lots examinedwere misidentified specimens <strong>of</strong> either E. chlorosoma(NLU 14752,57493,57497; UT 91.1377) or E. whipplei(NLU 56431). The single lot examined by Howell (1968;NLU 4439, formerly NLSC 4439) could not be locatedbut was presumably identified correctly, as all five specimenspossessed 2 anal spines, ruling out the likelihoodthat they could have been E. chlorosoma (1 anal spine).Comments.—Howell’s (1968) original concept <strong>of</strong> E.stigmaeum as a polytypic species was largely based on hisinterpretation <strong>of</strong> a small contact zone between nominalE. stigmaeum and E. jessiae in the Bear Creek system <strong>of</strong> theTennessee River drainage in northwestern Alabama. Six<strong>of</strong> 12 specimens he examined from Little Bear Creek possesseda frenum, which he considered the most distinctivecharacter separating E. stigmaeum (frenum absent) andE. jessiae (frenum present). He therefore concluded thatthese were intergrades, and as such, provided evidence <strong>of</strong>incomplete reproductive isolation between the two taxa.However, our analysis <strong>of</strong> meristic, breeding color, and allozymedata discussed below under “CONTACT ZONES”indicates that the Little Bear Creek population actuallyrepresents “pure” E. jessiae.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!