(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

More documents

Recommendations

Info

62 Bulletin 30 NOVEMBER 1, 2012TABLE 8. (Continued)Dorsal fin soft rays8 9 10 11 12 13 14 n Mean SDEtheostoma stigmaeumMobile Basin 94 313 78 485 11.0 0.60Bear Cr. (Tennessee R.) 18 34 2 54 10.7 0.54Eastern Gulf coast systems 24 55 3 82 10.7 0.52Central Gulf Coast systems 1 68 91 5 165 10.6 0.58Lower Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 20 72 7 99 10.9 0.51Upper Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 7 30 20 57 11.2 0.66Upper Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 1 25 78 28 132 11.0 0.66Lower Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 10 99 39 3 151 11.2 0.59Etheostoma jessiaeLower and middle Tennessee R. 17 95 9 121 11.9 0.46Little Bear Cr. 11 34 4 49 11.9 0.54Upper Tennessee R. (excluding Clinch R.) 2 45 148 26 221 11.9 0.59Clinch R. downstream of Norris Dam 37 86 6 129 11.8 0.53Clinch/Powell R. upstream of Norris Dam 1 13 36 4 1 55 11.8 0.66Etheostoma meadiaeUpper Powell River 1 4 32 12 49 11.1 0.63Upper Clinch River 2 61 69 132 11.5 0.53Etheostoma akatulo 25 142 36 203 11.1 0.55Etheostoma obama 1 81 97 6 185 11.6 0.57Etheostoma goreMiddle Cumberland R. 4 64 40 1 109 11.3 0.57Lower Cumberland R. 5 61 20 86 11.2 0.51Etheostoma jimmycarter 10 128 68 3 209 11.3 0.58Etheostoma teddyrooseveltArkansas R. 4 58 40 1 103 11.4 0.58Upper White R. 6 44 19 69 11.2 0.58Etheostoma clinton 27 67 8 2 104 10.9 0.63
Layman & Mayden Morphological Diversity and Phylogenetics of the Darter subgenus Doration (Percidae: Etheostoma) 63TABLE 9. ANAL FIN SOFT RAY AND LEFT PECTORAL FIN RAY COUNTS IN SPECIES OF DORATION. Values for holotypes are in boldface.Anal fin soft rays5-6 7 8 9 10 11 n Mean SDEtheostoma stigmaeumMobile Basin 57 334 94 485 8.1 0.55Bear Cr. (Tennessee R.) 2 44 8 54 8.1 0.42Eastern Gulf Coast systems 19 61 2 82 7.8 0.46Central Gulf Coast systems 39 117 9 165 7.8 0.51Lower Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 22 71 6 99 7.8 0.51Upper Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 2 38 17 57 8.3 0.52Upper Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 14 94 24 132 8.1 0.53Lower Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 1 8 111 31 151 8.1 0.52Etheostoma jessiaeLower and middle Tennessee R. 2 28 83 8 121 8.8 0.57Little Bear Cr. 1 17 30 1 49 8.6 0.57Upper Tennessee R. (excluding Clinch R.) 1 48 151 21 221 8.9 0.56Clinch R. downstream of Norris Dam 41 80 8 129 8.7 0.56Clinch/Powell R. upstream of Norris Dam 16 34 5 55 8.8 0.59Etheostoma meadiaeUpper Powell River 6 35 8 49 8.0 0.54Upper Clinch River 4 89 39 132 8.3 0.51Etheostoma akatulo 19 160 24 203 8.0 0.46Etheostoma obama 38 119 27 1 185 9.0 0.61Etheostoma goreMiddle Cumberland R. 1 56 50 2 109 8.5 0.55Lower Cumberland R. 1 2 41 40 2 86 8.5 0.70Etheostoma jimmycarter 6 120 83 209 8.4 0.54Etheostoma teddyrooseveltArkansas R. 7 63 32 1 103 8.3 0.59Upper White R. 2 56 11 69 8.1 0.42Etheostoma clinton 1 36 62 5 104 8.7 0.58
Page 2 and 3:
BULLETINALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL H
Page 5 and 6:
Morphological Diversity and Phyloge
Page 9 and 10:
Layman & Mayden Morphological Diver
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16: Layman & Mayden Morphological Diver
Page 65: Layman & Mayden Morphological Diver
Page 89 and 90: 13. Containing: Effects of Impoundm
Page 91: MUSEUM PAPERS (1910-1960, TERMINATE
show all

(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?