(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

58 Bulletin 30 NOVEMBER 1, 2012TABLE 5. CAUDAL PEDUNCLE SCALE ROW COUNTS IN SPECIES OF DORATION. Values for holotypes are in boldface.Caudal peduncle scale rows12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 n Mean SDEtheostoma stigmaeumMobile Basin 11 29 77 188 127 45 7 1 485 16.2 1.17Bear Cr. (Tennessee R.) 2 4 12 16 18 1 1 54 14.9 1.20Eastern Gulf coast systems 3 18 28 28 4 1 82 14.2 1.00Central Gulf Coast systems 4 11 79 60 10 1 165 15.4 0.82Lower Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 2 24 41 26 6 99 16.1 0.91Upper Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 1 16 29 8 3 57 15.9 0.84Upper Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 2 9 36 55 26 3 1 132 15.8 1.00Lower Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 2 17 76 35 18 2 1 151 16.4 0.97Etheostoma jessiaeLower and middle Tennessee R. 2 24 31 53 9 2 121 17.4 1.00Little Bear Cr. 12 16 17 4 49 17.3 0.93Upper Tennessee R. (excluding Clinch R.) 1 3 23 50 68 43 26 5 2 221 18.0 1.36Clinch R. downstream of Norris Dam 1 5 29 40 43 9 1 - 1 129 17.2 1.14Clinch/Powell R. upstream of Norris Dam 2 17 20 11 4 1 55 17.0 1.06Etheostoma meadiaeUpper Powell River 3 30 11 5 49 16.4 0.76Upper Clinch River 1 4 23 86 16 2 132 15.9 0.73Etheostoma akatulo 1 10 31 89 54 16 2 203 15.2 1.02Etheostoma obama 7 79 62 32 3 2 185 16.7 0.92Etheostoma goreMiddle Cumberland R. 1 15 29 56 6 2 109 15.5 0.90Lower Cumberland R. 1 5 18 41 14 7 86 16.0 1.02Etheostoma jimmycarter 6 27 34 134 6 2 209 15.5 0.89Etheostoma teddyrooseveltArkansas R. 1 19 49 24 9 1 103 16.2 0.92Upper White R. 2 14 35 17 1 69 16.0 0.80Etheostoma clinton 11 45 35 10 3 104 16.5 0.91