(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

60 Bulletin 30 NOVEMBER 1, 2012TABLE 7. PERCENT NAPE SQUAMATION IN SPECIES OF DORATION. Values for holotypes are in boldface.Percent nape squamation0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 n Mean SDEtheostoma stigmaeumMobile Basin 21 51 56 75 57 49 42 64 37 23 10 485 44.6 26.15Bear Cr. (Tennessee R.) 9 14 13 8 4 4 2 54 40.7 16.35Eastern Gulf coast systems 1 1 2 2 1 6 17 32 20 82 84.8 16.27Central Gulf Coast systems 1 3 13 18 18 11 16 30 21 11 23 165 61.4 26.39Lower Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 3 7 7 13 9 23 30 6 1 99 64.5 18.75Upper Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 1 3 4 9 16 11 13 57 81.2 15.24Upper Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 2 1 2 1 9 5 22 24 45 21 132 79.5 18.57Lower Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 6 11 17 8 12 12 22 32 28 3 151 61.9 25.40Etheostoma jessiaeLower and middle Tennessee R. 4 16 101 121 98.0 4.76Little Bear Cr. 1 3 3 42 49 97.6 6.62Upper Tennessee R. (excluding Clinch R.) 2 7 212 221 99.5 2.56Clinch R. downstream of Norris Dam 3 11 115 129 98.7 4.03Clinch/Powell R. upstream of Norris Dam 1 3 51 55 99.1 3.48Etheostoma meadiaeUpper Powell River 2 2 3 4 7 11 15 5 49 76.5 18.32Upper Clinch River 1 1 3 11 11 22 39 35 9 132 76.4 15.83Etheostoma akatulo 2 3 12 41 26 35 84 203 86.0 14.87Etheostoma obama 1 1 2 4 14 36 127 185 94.9 9.67Etheostoma goreMiddle Cumberland R. 1 1 3 10 15 35 32 12 109 80.3 13.71Lower Cumberland R. 3 16 37 30 86 90.9 8.21Etheostoma jimmycarter 1 1 2 7 16 33 149 209 95.0 9.81Etheostoma teddyrooseveltArkansas R. 1 4 3 13 82 103 96.6 7.99Upper White R. 1 3 5 8 3 3 6 13 9 18 69 71.6 26.77Etheostoma clinton 9 18 24 19 10 9 6 6 2 - 1 104 30.0 21.41