(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

56 Bulletin 30 NOVEMBER 1, 2012TABLE 4. COUNTS OF SCALE ROWS BELOW AND SCALE ROWS ABOVE LATERAL LINE IN SPECIES OF DORATION. Values for holotypes arein boldface.Scale rows below lateral line5 6 7 8 9 10 n Mean SDEtheostoma stigmaeumMobile Basin 16 140 207 101 19 2 485 6.9 0.91Bear Cr. (Tennessee R.) 8 27 17 2 54 6.2 0.75Eastern Gulf coast systems 22 37 21 2 82 6.0 0.79Central Gulf Coast systems 9 98 50 8 165 6.3 0.66Lower Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 3 49 28 16 3 99 6.7 0.89Upper Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 8 31 14 4 57 6.2 0.79Upper Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 9 66 43 14 132 6.5 0.78Lower Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 7 58 68 16 2 151 6.7 0.78Etheostoma jessiaeLower and middle Tennessee R. 18 66 30 7 121 7.2 0.77Little Bear Cr. 2 19 21 7 49 7.7 0.77Upper Tennessee R. (excluding Clinch R.) 20 85 80 31 5 221 7.6 0.91Clinch R. downstream of Norris Dam 16 50 53 10 129 7.4 0.81Clinch/Powell R. upstream of Norris Dam 6 22 25 2 55 7.4 0.74Etheostoma meadiaeUpper Powell River 1 23 18 7 49 6.6 0.76Upper Clinch River 1 66 47 18 132 6.6 0.73Etheostoma akatulo 15 135 49 4 203 6.2 0.59Etheostoma obama 2 116 59 8 185 6.4 0.59Etheostoma goreMiddle Cumberland R. 2 61 42 4 109 6.4 0.60Lower Cumberland R. 2 44 36 3 1 86 6.5 0.66Etheostoma jimmycarter 34 129 41 5 209 6.1 0.67Etheostoma teddyrooseveltArkansas R. 1 21 52 23 5 1 103 7.1 0.86Upper White R. 1 17 35 12 4 69 7.0 0.85Etheostoma clinton 29 31 38 6 104 7.2 0.92