(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

More documents

Recommendations

Info

64 Bulletin 30 NOVEMBER 1, 2012TABLE 9 (Continued)Left pectoral fin rays11 12 13 14 15 16 n Mean SDEtheostoma stigmaeumMobile Basin 5 110 328 42 485 13.8 0.57Bear Cr. (Tennessee R.) 33 21 54 14.4 0.49Eastern Gulf Coast systems 23 58 1 82 13.7 0.47Central Gulf Coast systems 33 125 7 165 13.8 0.47Lower Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 27 66 6 99 13.8 0.54Upper Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 7 42 8 57 14.0 0.52Upper Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 35 76 21 132 13.9 0.65Lower Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 2 44 90 15 151 13.8 0.63Etheostoma jessiaeLower and middle Tennessee R. 17 87 17 121 15.0 0.53Little Bear Cr. 6 39 4 49 15.0 0.45Upper Tennessee R. (excluding Clinch R.) 3 90 122 6 221 14.6 0.57Clinch R. downstream of Norris Dam 1 87 41 129 14.3 0.48Clinch/Powell R. upstream of Norris Dam 41 14 55 14.3 0.44Etheostoma meadiaeUpper Powell River 1 31 17 49 14.3 0.52Upper Clinch River 10 92 30 132 14.2 0.53Etheostoma akatulo 3 81 119 203 14.6 0.53Etheostoma obama 5 67 109 4 185 14.6 0.58Etheostoma goreMiddle Cumberland R. 3 74 32 109 14.3 0.50Lower Cumberland R. 8 70 8 86 14.0 0.43Etheostoma jimmycarter 1 88 116 4 209 14.6 0.54Etheostoma teddyrooseveltArkansas R. 5 78 20 103 14.1 0.47Upper White R. 3 55 11 69 14.1 0.44Etheostoma clinton 1 1 51 48 2 1 104 13.5 0.65
Layman & Mayden Morphological Diversity and Phylogenetics of the Darter subgenus Doration (Percidae: Etheostoma) 65TABLE 10. LEFT PREOPERCULOMANDIBULAR CANAL PORE COUNTS IN SPECIES OF DORATION. Values for holotypes are in boldface.Left preoperculomandibular canal pores7-8 9 10 11 12 n Mean SDEtheostoma stigmaeum 3 129 1060 32 1 1225 9.9 0.37Etheostoma jessiae 2 38 525 10 575 9.9 0.31Etheostoma meadiae 1 12 164 4 181 9.9 0.37Etheostoma akatulo 1 28 169 5 203 9.9 0.41Etheostoma obama 1 31 151 2 185 9.8 0.42Etheostoma gore 4 28 161 2 195 9.8 0.45Etheostoma jimmycarter 1 38 166 4 209 9.8 0.44Etheostoma teddyroosevelt 3 47 118 4 172 9.7 0.54Etheostoma clinton 1 95 8 104 9.1 0.29TABLE 11. PRINCIPAL CAUDAL FIN RAY COUNTS AND FREQUENCIES OF INDIVIDUALS WITH A FRENUM AND PALATINE TEETH INETHEOSTOMA JESSIAE FROM THE UPPER TENNESSEE RIVER AND E. MEADIAE. Numbered localities are shown in Figure 7.Etheostoma jessiaeUpper Tennessee R. (excluding Clinch R.)Clinch R. downstream of Norris DamPrincipal caudal fin raysFrenumpresentPalatine teethpresentn 12 13 14 15 16 17 Mean SD No. % No. %221 1 - 4 186 27 3 15.1 0.47 204 92.3 185 83.71. Emory R. and Poplar Cr. 34 1 30 3 15.1 0.34 32 94.1 24 70.62. Beaver Cr. And Bull Run Cr. 25 1 2 21 1 14.9 0.53 25 100.0 22 88.03. Hinds Cr. 24 3 16 4 1 15.1 0.68 24 100.0 23 95.84. Coal Cr. and nearby Clinch R. 46 3 37 4 2 15.1 0.57 45 97.8 37 80.4Clinch/Powell R. upstream of Norris Dam5. Cove Cr. 20 12 8 15.4 0.50 19 95.0 16 80.06. Big Sycamore Cr. 25 23 2 15.1 0.28 20 80.0 16 64.07. Pond opposite Doak’s Dam (Powell R.) 10 10 15.0 0.00 8 80.0 8 80.0Etheostoma meadiaeUpper Powell River49 9 10 30 16.4 0.79 18 36.7 18 36.7Upper Clinch River132 1 2 1 36 43 49 16.0 0.97 88 66.7 41 31.4
Page 2 and 3:
BULLETINALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL H
Page 5 and 6:
Morphological Diversity and Phyloge
Page 9 and 10:
Layman & Mayden Morphological Diver
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18: Layman & Mayden Morphological Diver
Page 67: Layman & Mayden Morphological Diver
Page 89 and 90: 13. Containing: Effects of Impoundm
Page 91: MUSEUM PAPERS (1910-1960, TERMINATE
show all

(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?