(Percidae: Etheostoma), with Descriptions of Five New Species

Layman & Mayden Morphological Diversity and Phylogenetics of the Darter subgenus Doration (Percidae: Etheostoma) 59TABLE 6. PERCENT CHEEK SQUAMATION IN SPECIES OF DORATION. Values for holotypes are in boldface.Percent cheek squamation0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 n Mean SDEtheostoma stigmaeumMobile Basin 33 54 152 113 47 35 23 21 6 1 485 28.9 18.04Bear Cr. (Tennessee R.) 2 16 18 17 1 54 19.8 9.21Eastern Gulf coast systems 1 6 17 23 14 14 7 82 53.8 14.54Central Gulf Coast systems 1 9 36 73 28 16 2 165 30.5 10.78Lower Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 1 5 8 12 28 23 12 10 99 63.0 16.19Upper Miss. Embayment, eastern tributaries 3 12 10 6 7 12 5 2 57 51.9 19.59Upper Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 2 7 18 19 20 39 18 7 2 132 51.5 17.23Lower Miss. Embayment, western tributaries 4 19 25 34 28 21 14 5 1 151 44.1 17.41Etheostoma jessiaeLower and middle Tennessee R. 11 36 45 23 5 - 1 121 18.3 10.62Little Bear Cr. 2 10 28 9 49 19.0 7.43Upper Tennessee R. (excluding Clinch R.) 2 32 105 67 10 4 1 221 23.0 9.01Clinch R. downstream of Norris Dam 10 31 58 19 8 1 2 129 19.6 11.28Clinch/Powell R. upstream of Norris Dam 2 11 24 14 4 55 21.3 9.44Etheostoma meadiaeUpper Powell River 46 1 2 49 1.0 4.21Upper Clinch River 121 10 - - 1 132 1.1 4.33Etheostoma akatulo 2 5 2 6 29 62 97 203 91.0 12.11Etheostoma obama 11 32 82 49 10 - - 1 185 21.1 10.10Etheostoma goreMiddle Cumberland R. 72 28 8 1 109 4.3 6.72Lower Cumberland R. 43 30 12 - 1 86 6.7 8.04Etheostoma jimmycarter 146 44 19 209 3.9 6.50Etheostoma teddyrooseveltArkansas R. 91 10 1 1 103 1.5 4.52Upper White R. 68 1 69 0.1 1.20Etheostoma clinton 50 28 16 7 1 - - - 2 104 9.7 13.97