Small and Medium Enterprises In the Era <strong>of</strong> Globalisation 9(Centre PPP Model); (b) SPV set up by the statesin partnership with private partners (State PPPModel); and (c) State or state agency other thanNGOs (Centre-State Model). The objectives <strong>of</strong>Mini Tool Rooms are as follows (LUS, December2010, pp. 9-16).* to improve the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> theMSMEs engaged in manufacturingactivity by creating capacities in theprivate sector for designing andmanufacturing quality tools;* to bridge the gap between demand andsupply <strong>of</strong> trained manpower in theindustry; &* to encourage Research and<strong>Development</strong>, and optimisation <strong>of</strong> costand quality <strong>of</strong> delivery, leading toenhanced competitiveness <strong>of</strong> themanufacturing sector.In Model I (Centre PPP Model), the projectis to be set up and operated by a privatepartner. Financial assistance will be given byGoI to meet the viability gap on a case-to-casebasis, and it will be restricted to 40 per cent <strong>of</strong>the project cost (not exceeding ` 9 crore). InModel II (State PPP Model), the project is tobe set up by the state government incooperation with NGOs (SPVs), who will runthe project on mutually agreed terms. Financialassistance will be equal to 90 per cent <strong>of</strong> thecost <strong>of</strong> machinery, restricted to ` 9 crore.However, in order to retain a say in themanagement, at least 26 per cent <strong>of</strong> the shareshould be with the state government. ThisModel can be considered if Model I is notfound to be feasible. In Model III (Centre-StateModel), project is to be set up and managedby the state government / state governmentagency. Financial assistance will be equal to90 per cent <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> machinery, restrictedto ` 9 crore. Financial assistance equal to 75per cent <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> machinery, restricted to` 7.5 crore can also be sanctioned forupgradation <strong>of</strong> an existing state tool room. ThisModel could be resorted to only where bothModel I and Model II are not found to bepracticable. First preference will be to adoptModel I. Others can be considered in thesequence stated above. Project sponsor’scontribution should be at least 15 per cent <strong>of</strong>the overall project cost.Building Awareness on IntellectualProperty Rights (IPRs) : The objective is tocreate and enhance awareness about IPRsamong units in the sector so as to enable themto take appropriate measures for protectingtheir ideas and business strategies, and alsoavoiding infringement <strong>of</strong> the intellectualproperty belonging to others. IP refers to legalrights that result from intellectual activity inthe industrial, scientific, literary, and artisticfields to preserve the innovations and R&Defforts <strong>of</strong> individuals and companies. It couldbe in the form <strong>of</strong> patents, trademarks,geographical indications, industrial designs,layout designs <strong>of</strong> integrated circuits, plantvariety protection, and copyright. Utilisation <strong>of</strong>IPR tools will enhance the competitiveness <strong>of</strong>MSMEs through technology upgradation. Theseinitiatives are proposed to be developedthrough PPP mode to encourageeconomically sustainable models for theoverall development <strong>of</strong> MSMEs. The schemeprovides for financial assistance for taking upthe following identified initiatives on a clusterbasis: (a) Awareness / sensitisationprogrammes on IPRs; (b) Pilot studies inselected clusters / groups <strong>of</strong> industries; (c)Interactive seminars / workshops; (d)Specialised training; (e) Assistance for grant<strong>of</strong> patent / GI registration; (f ) Setting up <strong>of</strong> IPFacilitation Centre; and (g) Interaction withinternational agencies (LUS, February 2011,pp.11-20).Application <strong>of</strong> Lean ManufacturingTechniques (LEAN) : The focus is on helpingMSMEs adopt Lean Manufacturing (LM)Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, Vol. 32, No. 1, <strong>January</strong> - <strong>March</strong> : <strong>2013</strong>JRD 2 (1)
10 D. Nagayya and P. Tirumala Raotechniques so as to enhance their productivity,efficiency and competitiveness by reducingor eliminating manufacturing waste, andstreamlining the system through application<strong>of</strong> various LM techniques, e.g., 5S System,Visual Control, Standard Operating Procedures(SOPs), Just in Time (JIT), KANBAN SystemCellular Layout, Value Stream Mapping, PokaYoke or Mistake Pro<strong>of</strong>ing, Total ProductiveMaintenance (TPM), etc. Workerempowerment is also emphasised. Initially thescheme will be implemented in 100 miniclusters (each <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> 10 enterprises) forone year at a total cost <strong>of</strong> ` 30 crore. Thescheme is in operation from July 2009. Later itwill be extended to 300-500 clusters in a fewyears. Results will be in the form <strong>of</strong> improvedprocess flows, reduced engineering time,proper personnel management, better spaceutilisation, scientific inventory management,etc. These will improve the quality <strong>of</strong> productsand reduce costs. LM counsellors appointedfor a few clusters will identify and implementappropriate LM techniques. The effort will bringabout improvement in the quality <strong>of</strong> productsat lower costs, which will enhance thecompetitive ability <strong>of</strong> enterprises. <strong>National</strong>Productivity Council, New Delhi has beenappointed the <strong>National</strong> Monitoring andImplementation Unit for the pilot project. TheMSME-<strong>Development</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> at the state levelhas nominated the nodal <strong>of</strong>ficer forcoordination with NPC at the local / field level.Awareness programmes will be conducted inthe clusters. Consultant’s fee for each clusterup to 80 per cent will be borne by GoI, and 20per cent by the beneficiary enterprises (LUS,November 2009, pp.6-8).Quality Management Standards (QMS)and Quality Technology Tools (QTT) : This waslaunched during 2008-09, with a budgetprovision <strong>of</strong> ` 40 crore for four years. Thescheme aims at improving the quality <strong>of</strong>products in the MSME sector, and inculcatingquality consciousness among units <strong>of</strong> thesector. The major activities envisaged underthe scheme are: (a) Introduction <strong>of</strong> appropriatemodules for technical institutions with a targetcoverage <strong>of</strong> 2000 technical institutions; (b)Organising awareness campaigns every yearfor MSMEs; (c) Organising competition-watch(c-watch) every year in the two sectors; (d)Implementation <strong>of</strong> QMS and QTT in 100selected MSEs every year; and (e) Monitoringat least two international study missions peryear. The focus is on sensitising andencouraging MSMEs to adopt the latest QMSand QTT techniques so as to strengthen theiroperations, and to keep a watch on the sectoraldevelopments in the country by undertakingdefined activities (LUS, October 2009, pp. 16-19).Energy Efficiency and Quality CertificationSupport (Energy) : The focus is on sensitisingenterprises and spreading an awareness aboutthe need and benefits <strong>of</strong> adopting energyefficient technologies and using differentquality certification measures for reducingemission <strong>of</strong> green house gases (GHGs), andimproving the quality <strong>of</strong> products at reducedcosts so as to improve the competitiveness <strong>of</strong>the enterprises in the global arena. Thefollowing initiatives are being pursued underthis scheme: (a) Conducting awarenessprogrammes on energy efficient technologies,availability <strong>of</strong> energy efficient equipments, andbenefits from energy efficient techniques andclean development mechanism (CDM); (b)Supporting energy audits in sample units inclusters; (c) Promoting replication <strong>of</strong> modelenergy efficient technologies (EET) afterpreparing detailed project reports in theclusters, and implementation <strong>of</strong> the clusterplan; (d) An innovative concept <strong>of</strong> clusterbasedcarbon credit aggregation centres(CCACs) has been planned under the schemeto initiate MSMEs to CDM benefits; and (e)MSMEs are encouraged to acquire productcertification / licences from national /international bodies, and adopt otherJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, Vol. 32, No. 1, <strong>January</strong> - <strong>March</strong> : <strong>2013</strong>JRD 2 (1)
- Page 2 and 3: Journal ofRural DevelopmentVol. 32
- Page 4 and 5: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 6 and 7: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 8 and 9: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 10 and 11: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 14 and 15: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 16 and 17: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 18 and 19: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 20: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 23 and 24: 20 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 25 and 26: 22 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 27 and 28: 24 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 29 and 30: 26 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 31 and 32: 28 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 33 and 34: 30 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 36 and 37: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 38 and 39: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 40 and 41: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 42 and 43: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 44 and 45: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 46 and 47: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 48 and 49: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 50 and 51: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 52 and 53: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 54 and 55: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 56 and 57: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 58 and 59: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 60 and 61: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 62:
Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 65 and 66:
62 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan Nayaka
- Page 67 and 68:
64 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakT
- Page 69 and 70:
66 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakT
- Page 71 and 72:
68 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan Nayakc
- Page 73 and 74:
70 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakT
- Page 75 and 76:
72 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakU
- Page 77 and 78:
74 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan Nayak2
- Page 79 and 80:
76 Arijit Royincreasing temperature
- Page 81 and 82:
78 Arijit RoyS is land size (in big
- Page 83 and 84:
80 Arijit RoyThe number of cattle p
- Page 85 and 86:
82 Arijit RoyThe role of Panchayats
- Page 87 and 88:
84 Arijit Royper cent. β2 is signi
- Page 90 and 91:
Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 92 and 93:
Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 94 and 95:
Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 96 and 97:
Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 98 and 99:
Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 100 and 101:
Book Journal Reviews of Rural Devel
- Page 102 and 103:
Book Reviews 99poverty, between agr
- Page 104 and 105:
Book Reviews 101areas. The authors
- Page 106 and 107:
Book Reviews 103the changes in the
- Page 108 and 109:
Book Reviews 105In Chapter five the
- Page 110 and 111:
Journal of Rural Development(Quarte
- Page 112:
3. An article published in an edite