12.07.2015 Views

January - March 2013 - National Institute of Rural Development

January - March 2013 - National Institute of Rural Development

January - March 2013 - National Institute of Rural Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Drinking Water and Sanitation in Uttar Pradesh: A Regional Analysis 67Table 5 : Per cent Distribution <strong>of</strong> Urban, <strong>Rural</strong> and TotalHouseholds by Types <strong>of</strong> Latrine for Uttar Pradesh and IndiaType <strong>of</strong> Latrine Urban <strong>Rural</strong> TotalUttar Pradesh2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001Water Closet 77.2 32 15.9 1.9 29.8 8Pit Latrine 2.9 18.1 4.5 8.3 4.2 10.3Other Latrine 3 30 1.3 8.9 1.7 15.2No Latrine 16.9 20 78.2 80.8 64.4 68.6IndiaWater Closet 72.6 46.1 19.4 7.1 36.4 18Pit Latrine 7.1 14.6 10.5 10.3 9.4 11.5Other Latrine 1.7 13 0.8 1.5 1.1 6.9No Latrine 18.6 26.3 69.3 78.1 53.1 63.6Source : Computed from the data provided by Census 2011.because <strong>of</strong> poor planning andimplementation.* Politically, sanitation and drinking waterare not a great priority.* The benefits <strong>of</strong> sanitation and watersupply are social and shared in nature,while the costs are private andgovernmental.* Poor cost recovery is also one <strong>of</strong> the mainreasons for poor condition <strong>of</strong> WSS sector.The tariff rates being charged from theconsumers are very low. The water andsewer tax is set at 12.5 per cent <strong>of</strong> theannual rental value <strong>of</strong> the property forunmetered consumers, which isassumed to depend on the size and othercharacteristics <strong>of</strong> property. Noconsiderations <strong>of</strong> coverage <strong>of</strong> capital orO & M expenditures or cost are takeninto account.Region-wise Access to Drinking Water andSanitationUttar Pradesh occupies the centralposition in the northern India. It is one <strong>of</strong> thelargest and most backward states in India witha diverse composition. Uttar Pradesh hassuffered from different types <strong>of</strong> inequality, i.e.regional disparity is one among them. Thereare four regions 5 in the State, viz., (1) Easternregion, (2) Western region, (3) Central region,and (4) Bundelkhand region (Diwakar, 2009).Economically, the Western region is themost developed with higher levels <strong>of</strong>urbanisation, i.e., better infrastructure, higheragricultural productivity, higher per capitaincome levels, i.e., ` 18,959 in 2006-07 atJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, Vol. 32, No. 1, <strong>January</strong> - <strong>March</strong> : <strong>2013</strong>JRD 2 (1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!