Small and Medium Enterprises In the Era <strong>of</strong> Globalisation 3fixed investment ` 5,008 billion, employment59.5 million, and exports ` 1,825 billion (US$40.36 billion) at current prices. In relation toall India export figure <strong>of</strong> US $126.4 billion for2006-07, MSME sector’s contribution is 32 percent, and has grown at 18.9 per cent over theprevious year, compared to 22.6 per cent foroverall exports. The estimates for 2010-11 are31.15 million total MSMEs, ` 7,735 billion fixedinvestment, ` 10,958 billion production atcurrent prices, and 73.22 million employment.Data relating to MSME exports is available onlyup to 2007-08. During 2007-08, MSME exportsaccounted for ` 2,020.2 billion at currentprices (US $50.25 billion), which works out to30.8 per cent <strong>of</strong> the country’s total exports <strong>of</strong>US $163.13 billion; and has grown at 24.5 percent over the previous year compared to 29per cent for overall exports. From 2006-07,data relating to the newly registered mediumenterprises are included in the revisedestimates. For earlier years, data cover onlymicro and small enterprises (Union Ministry <strong>of</strong>MSME, Annual Report 2011-12).In the context <strong>of</strong> enhancingcompetitiveness <strong>of</strong> MSME sector, it is importantto recall a few landmarks / recentdevelopments which have resulted inincreased fierce competition globally, andeven in the domestic market.July 1991April 2001Announcement <strong>of</strong> liberalisationpolicy in industry andtrade sectorsVirtual dismantling <strong>of</strong> all thequantitative restrictions (QRs)by India permitting liberalimport <strong>of</strong> goods from othercountries<strong>January</strong> 2010 Prime Minister’s Task Force onMSMEs submits its report to thePrime Minister. Vigorous action steps are beingtaken thereafter on various areas forovercoming the problems faced by the MSMEsector. Apart from the general decline inindustrial production during the period <strong>of</strong>global recession from September 2008 in thecountry, labour intensive export oriented smallenterprises have been adversely affected to agreater degree. These include industries suchas textiles, readymade garments, gems andjewellery, leather, handicrafts, handlooms, silkcarpets, marine products, toys, and sportsgoods. Export oriented industrial enterpriseshave been hit hard in a number <strong>of</strong> directionssuch as fierce global competition because <strong>of</strong>relatively low competitiveness <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> theIndian products, and rupee appreciation apartfrom recession in developed countries.MSMED Act, 2006The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises<strong>Development</strong> (MSMED) Act has becomeoperational from October 2006. Being acomprehensive legislation for the promotion,development, and enhancement <strong>of</strong>competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the MSME sector, a number<strong>of</strong> measures were provided for in the Act forenhancing competitiveness <strong>of</strong> SMEs, and forenabling the enterprises to avail <strong>of</strong> thebenefits <strong>of</strong> global markets.Under the Act, the enterprises have beencategorised into those engaged in (a)Manufacturing, and (b) Providing / Rendering<strong>of</strong> Services. Both categories have been furtherdivided into micro, small and mediumenterprises, based on their investment in plantJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, Vol. 32, No. 1, <strong>January</strong> - <strong>March</strong> : <strong>2013</strong>JRD 2 (1)
4 D. Nagayya and P. Tirumala Raoand machinery (for manufacturing) or inequipment (in case <strong>of</strong> service enterprises) asshown in Table 1.Table 1 : Classification <strong>of</strong> MSMEs byInvestment Limit(in ` million)Category Manufacturing Service<strong>of</strong> Enterprise (in plant & (in equipment)machinery)Micro up to 2.5 up to 1.0Small 2.5 to 50 1 to 20Medium 50 to 100 20 to 50The Act provides for a statutoryconsultative mechanism at the national levelwith wide representation <strong>of</strong> all stakeholders,and an advisory committee to assist the<strong>National</strong> Board and the central and stategovernments. The other features include: (a)Establishment <strong>of</strong> specific funds for thepromotion, development and enhancement <strong>of</strong>competitiveness <strong>of</strong> these enterprises; (b)Notifications <strong>of</strong> schemes / programmes for thispurpose; (c) Progressive credit policies andpractices; (d) Preference for governmentprocurement <strong>of</strong> products and services <strong>of</strong> MSEs;(e) Problem <strong>of</strong> delayed payments to MSEs; and(f) Simplification <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> closure <strong>of</strong>business by all the three categories <strong>of</strong>enterprises.De-reservation <strong>of</strong> Products for Manufacturein the MSE Sector, and Facilitating GreaterEquity Participation Including FDIThe policy <strong>of</strong> reservation <strong>of</strong> products forexclusive manufacture in the micro and smallenterprise (MSE) (earlier SSI) sector was startedin 1967. The objective <strong>of</strong> reservation was toprotect the interest <strong>of</strong> the SSI sector. However,with the gradual opening up <strong>of</strong> the economy,and policy <strong>of</strong> de-reservation, there has beenprogressive de-reservation <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong>items reserved for exclusive manufacture bythe MSE sector. The objective <strong>of</strong> progressivede-reservation was to provide foropportunities for technological upgradation,promotion <strong>of</strong> exports, and economies <strong>of</strong> scale,in order to encourage modernisation, andenhance the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> MSEs in view<strong>of</strong> the liberalisation and globalisation <strong>of</strong> theeconomy. After due consultation with thestakeholders, the Advisory Committee <strong>of</strong> theMinistry <strong>of</strong> MSME de-reserved a number <strong>of</strong>items from the reserved list. The recent onesare 125 items in <strong>March</strong> 2007, 79 in February2008, and 14 in October 2008. The totalnumber <strong>of</strong> items continuing in the reservedlist by <strong>March</strong> 2009 stood at 21. In September2009, the remaining 21 items were alsonotified as de-reserved, with the condition thatmedium and large units entering these itemswith or without foreign direct investment (FDI)should commit for exporting 50 per cent <strong>of</strong>their production within a maximum period <strong>of</strong>three years. They should obtain an industriallicence. If the FDI is more than 24 per cent,big players had to obtain prior approval <strong>of</strong>Foreign Investment Promotion Board. TheSeptember 2009 Press Release removed thisprocess <strong>of</strong> obtaining permission if the FDI inequity is above 24 per cent, and permitted FDIor participation by other businesses in MSMEswithout a ceiling. This enabled MSMEs to attractFDI or investment from other companies to agreater extent. Other developments whichenabled MSMEs to attract FDI or investmentfrom other companies to a greater equity arepassing <strong>of</strong> two acts, Limited LiabilityPartnership Act, and single person promotedcompanies under the Companies Act. Dereservationhas, thus, led to availing thebenefits <strong>of</strong> economies <strong>of</strong> scale by bigger unitsby using advanced technologies.Cluster <strong>Development</strong> ApproachFor over a decade, the cluster approachis being implemented as a potent tool forJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, Vol. 32, No. 1, <strong>January</strong> - <strong>March</strong> : <strong>2013</strong>JRD 2 (1)
- Page 2 and 3: Journal ofRural DevelopmentVol. 32
- Page 4 and 5: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 8 and 9: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 10 and 11: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 12 and 13: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 14 and 15: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 16 and 17: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 18 and 19: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 20: Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 23 and 24: 20 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 25 and 26: 22 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 27 and 28: 24 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 29 and 30: 26 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 31 and 32: 28 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 33 and 34: 30 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 36 and 37: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 38 and 39: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 40 and 41: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 42 and 43: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 44 and 45: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 46 and 47: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 48 and 49: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 50 and 51: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 52 and 53: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 54 and 55: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 56 and 57:
Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 58 and 59:
Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 60 and 61:
Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 62:
Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 65 and 66:
62 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan Nayaka
- Page 67 and 68:
64 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakT
- Page 69 and 70:
66 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakT
- Page 71 and 72:
68 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan Nayakc
- Page 73 and 74:
70 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakT
- Page 75 and 76:
72 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakU
- Page 77 and 78:
74 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan Nayak2
- Page 79 and 80:
76 Arijit Royincreasing temperature
- Page 81 and 82:
78 Arijit RoyS is land size (in big
- Page 83 and 84:
80 Arijit RoyThe number of cattle p
- Page 85 and 86:
82 Arijit RoyThe role of Panchayats
- Page 87 and 88:
84 Arijit Royper cent. β2 is signi
- Page 90 and 91:
Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 92 and 93:
Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 94 and 95:
Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 96 and 97:
Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 98 and 99:
Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 100 and 101:
Book Journal Reviews of Rural Devel
- Page 102 and 103:
Book Reviews 99poverty, between agr
- Page 104 and 105:
Book Reviews 101areas. The authors
- Page 106 and 107:
Book Reviews 103the changes in the
- Page 108 and 109:
Book Reviews 105In Chapter five the
- Page 110 and 111:
Journal of Rural Development(Quarte
- Page 112:
3. An article published in an edite