Extent <strong>of</strong> People’s Participation In Sant Gadge Baba Sanitation Mission In Maharashtra... 93Table 3 : Distribution <strong>of</strong> Respondents According totheir Activity-wise Participation in Sanitation MissionS.No. Activities Frequency Percentage(N = 150)1) Village sweeping and freedom from garbage 119 79.332) Cleaning/construction <strong>of</strong> soakpits 65 43.333) School and public buildings sanitation campaign day 84 56.004) House and environmental sanitation and decoration day 75 50.005) Exhibition <strong>of</strong> literature on sanitation campaign 62 41.336) Publicity, technical knowledge campaign 40 26.677) Latrine repairs/ construction campaign day 55 36.678) Self-cleanliness awareness programme 110 73.339) Clean water practical and training day 80 53.3310) Road repairs, sweeping and shramdan day 92 61.3311) Cattle sanitation campaign 78 52.0012) Ideal cattleshed and clean animal competition 75 50.0013) Conservation <strong>of</strong> trees, kitchen garden, protectionand non-conventional energy day 65 43.3314) Village level slogan and essay competition 80 53.3315) Freedom from addiction 84 56.0016) Healthy baby competition 78 52.0017) Mother & child care diagnosis and diseases 68 45.3318) Control <strong>of</strong> communicable diseases 71 47.3319) Disposal <strong>of</strong> sewage water 40 26.6620) Reuse <strong>of</strong> sewage water 44 29.3321) Resolution or commitment day 130 86.66campaign, ideal cattleshed and clean animalcompetition, village level slogan and essaycompetition, freedom from addiction, healthybaby competition and resolution orcommitment day.Besides the above activities, only thoseactivities with less than 50 per centparticipation <strong>of</strong> the respondents in sanitationmission are cleaning and construction <strong>of</strong>soakpits, exhibition <strong>of</strong> literature on sanitationJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, Vol. 32, No. 1, <strong>January</strong> - <strong>March</strong> : <strong>2013</strong>JRD 2 (1)
94 P. B. Umale, U.R. Chinchmalatpure and Punam Kaducampaign, publicity, technical knowledgecampaign day, latrine repairs/constructioncampaign day, conservation <strong>of</strong> trees, kitchengarden, protection and non-conventionalenergy day, mother and child care diagnosisand diseases, control <strong>of</strong> communicabledisease, disposal <strong>of</strong> sewage water and reuse<strong>of</strong> sewage water.It was observed that there was highparticipation <strong>of</strong> people i.e. 86.33, 79.33 and73.33 per cent in activities like resolution dayor commitment day, village sweeping andfreedom from garbage, self-cleanlinessawareness programme activities, respectivelybecause some people were highly awareabout sanitation (Table 3). Mediumparticipation <strong>of</strong> people was observed i.e. 61.3,56, 53.30, 52, 50 per cent in activities such asroad repairs, sweeping and shramdan day,school and public buildings sanitationcampaign day, freedom from addiction, cleanwater practical and training day, village levelslogan and essay competition, cattle sanitationcampaign, healthy baby competition, houseand environmental sanitation and decorationday, ideal cattleshed and clean animalcompetition, respectively and low participation<strong>of</strong> people i.e. 47.33, 45.33, 43.33, 41.33,36.67, 29.33, 26.66 per cent respondentsparticipated in control <strong>of</strong> communicablediseases, mother and child care diagnosis anddiseases, cleaning/construction <strong>of</strong> soak pits,conservation <strong>of</strong> trees, kitchen gardenprotection and non-conventional energy day,exhibition <strong>of</strong> literature on sanitation campaign,latrine repairs/construction campaign day,reuse <strong>of</strong> silage water, disposal <strong>of</strong> silage water,publicity technical knowledge campaign day,respectively.From the above findings it could beinferred that majority <strong>of</strong> the respondentsparticipated in activities like resolution orcommitment day, village sweeping andfreedom from garbage, self-cleanlinessawareness programme.Reasons for Non-participation <strong>of</strong> People inSant Gadge Baba Sanitation MissionThe categorisation <strong>of</strong> people accordingto their reasons for non-participation insanitation mission is presented in Table 4.It was observed that 36.66 per centrespondents have the reasons like lack <strong>of</strong> timedue to busy schedule for non-participation,22.66 per cent respondents, mainly femalesdid not participate because <strong>of</strong> male dominatedfamily, 21.33 per cent respondents did notparticipate because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> awareness anddue to parda system for females by 19.33 percent respondents. About 17.33 per centrespondents stated casteism as the reason fornon-participation and 16.66 per centrespondents were not interested in any socialactivity. Some respondents, 16 per cent didnot participate as they were not capable <strong>of</strong>doing work because <strong>of</strong> old age (Table 4).From the above findings, it could beinferred that majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents havereasons for non-participation such as lack <strong>of</strong>time due to busy schedule, being maledominated family and illiteracy. The abovefinding goes with the findings <strong>of</strong> Deshmukhand Kulkarni (2006).Major FindingsMajority <strong>of</strong> respondents whoparticipated in sanitation mission were foundto be in young age category i.e. up to 35 years(54 per cent) and higher percentage (30 percent) <strong>of</strong> them were educated up to highschool. Regarding their annual income,majority <strong>of</strong> respondents had their yearlyannual income (46 per cent) up to ` 25,000and relatively higher per cent <strong>of</strong> respondentsbelonged to medium (33.33 per cent) socioeconomicstatus. Majority <strong>of</strong> respondents(38.67 per cent) had moderate socialparticipation and (68 per cent) had mediumutilisation <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> information. MajorityJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, Vol. 32, No. 1, <strong>January</strong> - <strong>March</strong> : <strong>2013</strong>JRD 2 (1)
- Page 2 and 3:
Journal ofRural DevelopmentVol. 32
- Page 4 and 5:
Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 6 and 7:
Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 8 and 9:
Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 10 and 11:
Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 12 and 13:
Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 14 and 15:
Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 16 and 17:
Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 18 and 19:
Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 20:
Small and Medium Enterprises In the
- Page 23 and 24:
20 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 25 and 26:
22 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 27 and 28:
24 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 29 and 30:
26 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 31 and 32:
28 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 33 and 34:
30 Biju Paul Abraham, Bhaskar Chakr
- Page 36 and 37:
Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 38 and 39:
Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 40 and 41:
Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 42 and 43:
Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 44 and 45:
Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 46 and 47: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 48 and 49: Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks
- Page 50 and 51: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 52 and 53: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 54 and 55: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 56 and 57: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 58 and 59: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 60 and 61: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 62: Empowerment from the Above - Respon
- Page 65 and 66: 62 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan Nayaka
- Page 67 and 68: 64 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakT
- Page 69 and 70: 66 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakT
- Page 71 and 72: 68 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan Nayakc
- Page 73 and 74: 70 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakT
- Page 75 and 76: 72 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan NayakU
- Page 77 and 78: 74 Rashmi Tiwari and Sanatan Nayak2
- Page 79 and 80: 76 Arijit Royincreasing temperature
- Page 81 and 82: 78 Arijit RoyS is land size (in big
- Page 83 and 84: 80 Arijit RoyThe number of cattle p
- Page 85 and 86: 82 Arijit RoyThe role of Panchayats
- Page 87 and 88: 84 Arijit Royper cent. β2 is signi
- Page 90 and 91: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 92 and 93: Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 94 and 95: Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 98 and 99: Extent of People’s Participation
- Page 100 and 101: Book Journal Reviews of Rural Devel
- Page 102 and 103: Book Reviews 99poverty, between agr
- Page 104 and 105: Book Reviews 101areas. The authors
- Page 106 and 107: Book Reviews 103the changes in the
- Page 108 and 109: Book Reviews 105In Chapter five the
- Page 110 and 111: Journal of Rural Development(Quarte
- Page 112: 3. An article published in an edite