confrontation over Taiwan in 1958, the CFAG’s report twice mentioned the danger of“imperialist war mongers” (namely the United States) provoking a world war or aregional war. Moreover, <strong>Chinese</strong> leaders feared that US strategy was to create “twoChinas” <strong>and</strong> to occupy Taiwan permanently. Deputy Foreign Minister Luo Guiboconcluded in an internal talk on 4 March 1959 that “the goal of the United States is toattempt to seize possession of Taiwan permanently.” 19 Both Luo’s talk <strong>and</strong> the CFAGreport recognized the United States as the primary enemy of China. Chen Yi also arguedat an internal meeting that the US was China’s “foremost <strong>and</strong> also last enemy.” 20 Such abelief was not merely based on the ideological consideration that the United States was“the head of imperialism.” Equally, if not more important, was that Beijing saw Americ<strong>and</strong>esigns regarding Taiwan as being hostile <strong>and</strong> threatening to <strong>Chinese</strong> strategic <strong>and</strong>security interests. It believed, as Luo’s words bluntly put it, that the United States soughtto separate Taiwan—where ruler Generalissimo Jiang Jieshi (Chiang Kai-shek) had beenclamoring for “recovering the mainl<strong>and</strong>” <strong>and</strong> overthrowing the communist regime inBeijing—from the mainl<strong>and</strong> permanently by promoting a so-called two Chinas plot.In such a strategic situation, Sino-Soviet unity would have greatly improvedChina’s strategic position. Luo Guibo acknowledged in his talk that “the active support of<strong>and</strong> coordination in our diplomacy by the Soviet Union <strong>and</strong> other fraternal countries isalso an important factor to the victory of our diplomacy.” 21 Recent sources <strong>and</strong> studiesalso show that the Soviet Union was more active <strong>and</strong> enthusiastic in supporting <strong>Chinese</strong>military operations against the offshore isl<strong>and</strong>s of Jinmen (Quemoy) <strong>and</strong> Mazu (Matsu),19 “Luo Guibo fubuzhang zai di’erci waishi gongzuo huiyi shang de fayan” (Deputy Minister Luo Guibo’s Talk at theSecond Foreign Affairs Working Meeting), 4 March 1959, ibid.20 “Chen Yi fuzhongli zai di’erci quanguo waishi gongzuo huiyi shang de baogao (jilu gao)” (Vice Premier Chen Yi’sReport at the Second National Foreign Affairs Working Meeting (Recorded Copy)), 7 March 1959, ibid.21 “Luo Guibo fubuzhang zai di’erci waishi gongzuo huiyi shang de fayan”, 4 March 1959, ibid.9
strongholds of Guomingdang (KMT) armies, during the second Taiwan Strait Crisis inthe fall of 1958. 22 In the first few weeks of August, the Soviet Union promised a series oftransfers of military equipment to China, including long-range artillery, amphibiousequipment, air-to-air missiles, <strong>and</strong> combat aircraft, together with Soviet military advisers,in hopes of aiding China’s upcoming operations against the Jiang Jieshi regime. 23 In earlySeptember 1958, Khrushchev received <strong>Chinese</strong> Ambassador to the Soviet Union LiuXiao in the Crimea <strong>and</strong> offered Soviet assistance to strengthen <strong>Chinese</strong> air forces in theTaiwan Strait so that American <strong>and</strong> Nationalist naval forces might be deterred. 24Recently published <strong>Chinese</strong> sources reveal that <strong>Chinese</strong> leaders went to greatlengths to preserve the status of the Soviet Union as the leader of the socialist camp. InJanuary 1959 Khrushchev informed the <strong>Chinese</strong> leadership of his decision to announce atthe coming 21 st Congress of the CPSU that the Soviet Union would no longer be the headof the socialist camp <strong>and</strong> that the CPSU would cease to be the center of the internationalcommunist movement. <strong>The</strong> CCP quickly sent Zhou Enlai to Moscow to dissuadeKhrushchev from doing so. 25In his first meeting with Mikhail Suslov, a senior member of the Politburo of theCC CPSU, Zhou conveyed the view of the <strong>Chinese</strong> leadership that “under currentconditions, it is inappropriate to revoke the formulations (tifa) of having the Soviet Union22 <strong>The</strong> earlier literature takes the view that Khrushchev withheld military support from China in the summer of 1958because he worried that Mao might draw the Soviet Union into a nuclear war with the United States. Recent research,however, reveals that Khrushchev was actually supportive of Beijing’s brinkmanship strategy. See Zagoria, <strong>The</strong> Sino-Soviet Conflict, p. 217; Zubok <strong>and</strong> Pleshakov, Inside the Kremlin’s Cold War, pp. 226-227.23 Mark Kramer, “<strong>The</strong> USSR Foreign Ministry’s Appraisal of Sino-Soviet Relations on the Eve of the Split, September1959,” CWIHP Bulletin, Issues 6-7, Winter 1995/1996, pp. 170-185.24 Khrushchev’s offer, however, was politely declined by Mao in a reply to Khrushchev ten days later, presumably dueto Mao’s sensitivity to the penetration of Soviet influence into <strong>Chinese</strong> military. Liu Xiao, Chushi sulian banian (EightYears of Diplomatic Mission to the Soviet Union) (Beijing: Zhonggong dangshi, 1998), pp. 74-78.25 <strong>The</strong> Institute of Documentary Research of the CC CCP ed., Zhou Enlai nianpu, 1949-1976 (A Chronological Recordof Zhou Enlai’s Life, 1949-1976) (Beijing: Zhongyang wenxian, 1997), vol. 2, p. 203.10
- Page 1 and 2: COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJ
- Page 3 and 4: COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJ
- Page 5 and 6: #46 Laurent Rucker, “Moscow’s S
- Page 7 and 8: AbstractRelying on newly available
- Page 9 and 10: with the Soviet Union. It was not u
- Page 11 and 12: “To Have the Soviet Union as the
- Page 13: The document shows that Chinese lea
- Page 17 and 18: dog tries to jump over the wall, re
- Page 19 and 20: that “some comrades seem to belie
- Page 21 and 22: sharp vigilance against the schemes
- Page 23 and 24: Liu Shaoqi, and Zhou Enlai laid out
- Page 25 and 26: consolidate the unity of the social
- Page 27 and 28: peaceful settlements in both instan
- Page 29 and 30: have believed that Khrushchev’s B
- Page 31 and 32: the speech on 8 October. The report
- Page 33 and 34: twenty-two years did not take milit
- Page 35 and 36: supports China’s development.”
- Page 37 and 38: moves. 97 At a meeting in early Mar
- Page 39 and 40: American U-2 spy plane was shot dow
- Page 41 and 42: 1960. 109 In an unusual move, on 9
- Page 43 and 44: At a June 8 meeting of the permanen
- Page 45 and 46: Reappraisal of Sino-Soviet Relation
- Page 47 and 48: On 10 August, Chairman Mao reviewed
- Page 49 and 50: too much. But even if one word he s
- Page 51 and 52: The Chinese leadership had decided
- Page 53 and 54: the Soviets’ eagerness to avoid a
- Page 55 and 56: “great nation chauvinism” (dagu
- Page 57 and 58: enemy.” 163After the conclusion o
- Page 59 and 60: At the CPSU Central Committee plenu
- Page 61 and 62: Khrushchev during the Soviet leader
- Page 63 and 64: Laos.” 180 During his conversatio
- Page 65 and 66:
more and more convinced that Khrush
- Page 67 and 68:
evisionist line.” 198 In answerin
- Page 69 and 70:
intense.” Kennedy demanded that K
- Page 71 and 72:
sophisticated strategic calculation
- Page 73 and 74:
people, and [they will] say that we
- Page 75 and 76:
Moscow conference raised the Chines
- Page 77 and 78:
APPENDIX I: A Description of the Co
- Page 79 and 80:
Author’s NoteDong Wang, who recei
- Page 81 and 82:
National Foreign Affairs Working Me
- Page 83 and 84:
China), vols. 8-9. Beijing: Zhongya
- Page 85 and 86:
Luthi, Lorenz, The Sino-Soviet Spli