The Quarrelling Brothers: New Chinese Archives and a ... - CiteSeerX

More documents

Recommendations

Info

THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECTWORKING PAPER SERIESCHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN, Series EditorThis paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold WarInternational History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center forScholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. andCatherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project(CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the ColdWar as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of thepost-World War II superpower rivalry. The project supports the full and promptrelease of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeksto accelerate the process of integrating new sources, materials and perspectives fromthe former “Communist bloc” with the historiography of the Cold War which hasbeen written over the past few decades largely by Western scholars reliant onWestern archival sources. It also seeks to transcend barriers of language, geography,and regional specialization to create new links among scholars interested in ColdWar history. Among the activities undertaken by the project to promote this aim area periodic BULLETIN to disseminate new findings, views, and activities pertainingto Cold War history; a fellowship program for young historians from the formerCommunist bloc to conduct archival research and study Cold War history in theUnited States; international scholarly meetings, conferences, and seminars; andpublications.The CWIHP Working Paper Series is designed to provide a speedypublications outlet for historians associated with the project who have gained accessto newly-available archives and sources and would like to share their results. Weespecially welcome submissions by junior scholars from the former Communist blocwho have done research in their countries’ archives and are looking to introduce theirfindings to a Western audience. As a non-partisan institute of scholarly study, theWoodrow Wilson Center takes no position on the historical interpretations andopinions offered by the authors.Those interested in receiving copies of the Cold War International HistoryProject Bulletin or any of the Working Papers should contact:Cold War International History ProjectWoodrow Wilson International Center for ScholarsOne Woodrow Wilson Plaza1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NWWashington, DC 20523Telephone: (202) 691-4110Fax: (202) 691-4001Email: coldwar@wilsoncenter.orgCWIHP Web Page: http://www.cwihp.org
COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPERS SERIESChristian F. Ostermann, Series Editor#1 Chen Jian, “The Sino-Soviet Alliance and China’s Entry into the Korean War”#2 P.J. Simmons, “Archival Research on the Cold War Era: A Report from Budapest, Prague and Warsaw”#3 James Richter, “Reexamining Soviet Policy Towards Germany during the Beria Interregnum”#4 Vladislav M. Zubok, “Soviet Intelligence and the Cold War: The ‘Small’ Committee of Information, 1952-53”#5 Hope M. Harrison, “Ulbricht and the Concrete ‘Rose’: New Archival Evidence on the Dynamics ofSoviet-East German Relations and the Berlin Crisis, 1958-61”#6 Vladislav M. Zubok, “Khrushchev and the Berlin Crisis (1958-62)”#7 Mark Bradley and Robert K. Brigham, “Vietnamese Archives and Scholarship on the Cold War Period:Two Reports”#8 Kathryn Weathersby, “Soviet Aims in Korea and the Origins of the Korean War, 1945-50: New EvidenceFrom Russian Archives”#9 Scott D. Parrish and Mikhail M. Narinsky, “New Evidence on the Soviet Rejection of the Marshall Plan,1947: Two Reports”#10 Norman M. Naimark, “‘To Know Everything and To Report Everything Worth Knowing’: Building theEast German Police State, 1945-49”#11 Christian F. Ostermann, “The United States, the East German Uprising of 1953, and the Limits ofRollback”#12 Brian Murray, “Stalin, the Cold War, and the Division of China: A Multi-Archival Mystery”#13 Vladimir O. Pechatnov, “The Big Three After World War II: New Documents on Soviet Thinking aboutPost-War Relations with the United States and Great Britain”#14 Ruud van Dijk, “The 1952 Stalin Note Debate: Myth or Missed Opportunity for German Unification?”#15 Natalia I. Yegorova, “The ‘Iran Crisis’ of 1945-46: A View from the Russian Archives”#16 Csaba Bekes, “The 1956 Hungarian Revolution and World Politics”#17 Leszek W. Gluchowski, “The Soviet-Polish Confrontation of October 1956: The Situation in the PolishInternal Security Corps”#18 Qiang Zhai, “Beijing and the Vietnam Peace Talks, 1965-68: New Evidence from Chinese Sources”#19 Matthew Evangelista, “’Why Keep Such an Army?’” Khrushchev’s Troop Reductions”#20 Patricia K. Grimsted, “The Russian Archives Seven Years After: ‘Purveyors of Sensations’ or ‘ShadowsCast to the Past’? ”#21 Andrzej Paczkowski and Andrzej Werblan, “‘On the Decision to Introduce Martial Law in Poland in1981’ Two Historians Report to the Commission on Constitutional Oversight of the SEJM of the Republic ofPoland”
Page 1: COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJ
Page 5 and 6: #46 Laurent Rucker, “Moscow’s S
Page 7 and 8: AbstractRelying on newly available
Page 9 and 10: with the Soviet Union. It was not u
Page 11 and 12: “To Have the Soviet Union as the
Page 13 and 14: The document shows that Chinese lea
Page 15 and 16: strongholds of Guomingdang (KMT) ar
Page 17 and 18: dog tries to jump over the wall, re
Page 19 and 20: that “some comrades seem to belie
Page 21 and 22: sharp vigilance against the schemes
Page 23 and 24: Liu Shaoqi, and Zhou Enlai laid out
Page 25 and 26: consolidate the unity of the social
Page 27 and 28: peaceful settlements in both instan
Page 29 and 30: have believed that Khrushchev’s B
Page 31 and 32: the speech on 8 October. The report
Page 33 and 34: twenty-two years did not take milit
Page 35 and 36: supports China’s development.”
Page 37 and 38: moves. 97 At a meeting in early Mar
Page 39 and 40: American U-2 spy plane was shot dow
Page 41 and 42: 1960. 109 In an unusual move, on 9
Page 43 and 44: At a June 8 meeting of the permanen
Page 45 and 46: Reappraisal of Sino-Soviet Relation
Page 47 and 48: On 10 August, Chairman Mao reviewed
Page 49 and 50: too much. But even if one word he s
Page 51 and 52: The Chinese leadership had decided
Page 53 and 54:
the Soviets’ eagerness to avoid a
Page 55 and 56:
“great nation chauvinism” (dagu
Page 57 and 58:
enemy.” 163After the conclusion o
Page 59 and 60:
At the CPSU Central Committee plenu
Page 61 and 62:
Khrushchev during the Soviet leader
Page 63 and 64:
Laos.” 180 During his conversatio
Page 65 and 66:
more and more convinced that Khrush
Page 67 and 68:
evisionist line.” 198 In answerin
Page 69 and 70:
intense.” Kennedy demanded that K
Page 71 and 72:
sophisticated strategic calculation
Page 73 and 74:
people, and [they will] say that we
Page 75 and 76:
Moscow conference raised the Chines
Page 77 and 78:
APPENDIX I: A Description of the Co
Page 79 and 80:
Author’s NoteDong Wang, who recei
Page 81 and 82:
National Foreign Affairs Working Me
Page 83 and 84:
China), vols. 8-9. Beijing: Zhongya
Page 85 and 86:
Luthi, Lorenz, The Sino-Soviet Spli
show all

The Quarrelling Brothers: New Chinese Archives and a ... - CiteSeerX

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?