12.07.2015 Views

compatibility of ultra high performance concrete as repair material

compatibility of ultra high performance concrete as repair material

compatibility of ultra high performance concrete as repair material

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The different failure modes obtained throughout this experimental work show that theslant shear test method is <strong>high</strong>ly dependent on the joint angle used: the bond capacity andfailure mode can vary significantly from one interface angle to other.As previously discussed, there is controversy between researchers about the sensitivity <strong>of</strong>this test to the degree <strong>of</strong> roughness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>concrete</strong> substrate. The excellent bond betweenUHPC and NSC prevents the development <strong>of</strong> a conclusive statement about this matterdue to the fact that most <strong>of</strong> the specimens did not fail in the bond interface. Therefore,most <strong>of</strong> the bond capacities estimated are a lower bound <strong>of</strong> the real strength <strong>of</strong> the bond.However, there is some evidence that suggests the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> this test to the degree <strong>of</strong>roughness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>concrete</strong> substrate, such <strong>as</strong> the study c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> specimens with bondinterface <strong>of</strong> 70° at 8 days, all specimens with brushed surface failed in the <strong>concrete</strong>substrate where<strong>as</strong> that the most <strong>of</strong> other specimens still failed in the <strong>concrete</strong> substrate. Inorder to draw a definitive conclusion in this matter, it would be necessary to design<strong>concrete</strong> substrate with <strong>high</strong>er mechanical strengths to try to obtain more sliding failuremodes (failure along the interface).The evolution <strong>of</strong> the bond strength h<strong>as</strong> a critical point between the 48 hours and 72 hoursafter c<strong>as</strong>ting the UHPC on the <strong>concrete</strong> substrate. During the second and third day, theUHPC and bond interface strengths exceed that <strong>of</strong> the NSC. This conclusion is applicableto the specified UHPC used in this research and under ambient conditions. This intervalmight vary with other UHPC formulations or under different curing treatments. Thethreshold <strong>of</strong> 3 days to acquire a UHPC and bond with <strong>high</strong>er strengths than that <strong>of</strong> NSCcoincides with the recommendation given by Lafarge North America (the providercompany <strong>of</strong> the UHPC <strong>material</strong> used in this project) which suggests not to apply any loaduntil UHPC h<strong>as</strong> developed a compressive strength <strong>of</strong> 14500 psi. Notice that thecompressive strength under ambient conditions obtained in this research at 2 days w<strong>as</strong>11688 psi, at 3 days 12298 psi and at 8 days greater than 15286 psi.The COV varies from 2.4% to 23.9% hence, the test can be considered <strong>as</strong> consistent. Thisrange is similar to the different COV’s obtained by other authors, such <strong>as</strong> (Santos andJulio 2011), from 2.1% to 38.3%, or Momayez et al. (2005), from 4.7 to 15.8%.90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!