Graybeal, B., and Tanesi, J. (2007). "Durability <strong>of</strong> an <strong>ultra</strong><strong>high</strong>-<strong>performance</strong> <strong>concrete</strong>."Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(10), 848-854.Hindo, K. R. (1990). "In-place bond testing and surface preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>concrete</strong>."Concrete International, 12, 46-48.International Concrete Repair Institute (1997). "Selecting and Specifying ConcreteSurface Preparation for Sealers, Coatings, and Polymer Overlays."Sterling,Virginia, 41.Issa, M. A., Alh<strong>as</strong>san, M. A., and Shabila, H. (2008). "High-<strong>performance</strong> plain andfibrous latex-modified and microsilica <strong>concrete</strong> overlays." Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials inCivil Engineering, 20(12), 742-753.Jones, M., Zheng, L., and Newlands, M. (2002). "Comparison <strong>of</strong> particle packing modelsfor proportioning <strong>concrete</strong> constitutents for minimum voids ratio." Materials andStructures, 35(5), 301-309.Julio, E. N. B. S., Branco, F. A. B., and Silva, V. D. (2005). "Concrete-to-<strong>concrete</strong> bondstrength: Influence <strong>of</strong> an epoxy-b<strong>as</strong>ed bonding agent on a roughened substratesurface." Magazine <strong>of</strong> Concrete Research, 57, 463-468.Kamen, A. "Time Dependent Behaviour <strong>of</strong> Ultra High Performance Fibre ReinforcedConcrete (UHPFRC)." Proc., 6th International PhD Symposium in CivilEngineering.Kim, D. J., Wille, K., Naaman, A. E, and El-Tawil, S. (2011). "Strength dependent tensilebehavior <strong>of</strong> strain hardening fiber reinforced <strong>concrete</strong>." Proceedings <strong>of</strong> Rilem106
International Workshop on High Performance Fiber Reinforced CementComposites – HPFRCC6, Ann Arbor, USA, (in press).Kollmorgen, G. A. (2004). "Impact <strong>of</strong> age and size on the mechanical behavior <strong>of</strong> an <strong>ultra</strong><strong>high</strong> <strong>performance</strong> <strong>concrete</strong>." M<strong>as</strong>ter <strong>of</strong> Science in Civil Engineering, MichiganTechnological University, Houghton, MI.Kosmatka, S. H., and Wilson, M. L. (2011). Design and Control <strong>of</strong> Concrete Mixtures,Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.Lafarge North America (2003). "Ductal Reference T 006, Operating Procedure FlowTest."Calgary, Canada.Lee, M.-G., Chiu, C.-T., and Wang, Y.-C. (2005). "The study <strong>of</strong> bond strength and bonddurability <strong>of</strong> reactive powder <strong>concrete</strong>." Journal <strong>of</strong> ASTM International, 2, 485-494.Li, S. E., Geissert, D. G., Frantz, G. C., and Stephens, J. E. (1999). "Freeze-thaw bonddurability <strong>of</strong> rapid-setting <strong>concrete</strong> <strong>repair</strong> <strong>material</strong>s." ACI Materials Journal, 96,242-249.Markovic, I. (2006). "High-<strong>performance</strong> hybrid-fibre <strong>concrete</strong> : development andutilisation."PhD Thesis, Delft University <strong>of</strong> Technology Delft.Michigan Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation (1996). "Standard Specifications forConstruction."Lansing, MI.Michigan Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation (2009). "MDOT Bridge DesignManual."Lansing, MI.107
- Page 1 and 2:
COMPATIBILITY OF ULTRA HIGH PERFORM
- Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsList of Figures ..
- Page 5 and 6:
4.3.2 Discussion ..................
- Page 7 and 8:
Figure 3.14 CSP index .............
- Page 9 and 10:
Table 4.7 Summary of indirect tensi
- Page 11 and 12:
List of AbbreviationsACI.AFtASTM.CO
- Page 13 and 14:
1 Introduction and MotivationCurren
- Page 15:
2 Background and Literature ReviewT
- Page 18 and 19:
spaces and to decrease the amount o
- Page 20 and 21:
water/binder=constantChoose steel f
- Page 22 and 23:
UHPC formulations and provides a se
- Page 24 and 25:
Table 2.3Comparison of UHPC materia
- Page 26 and 27:
esults obtained in this project wer
- Page 28 and 29:
2.1.3.4 Environmental Impact of UHP
- Page 30 and 31:
1997). Emmons and Vaysburd (1996) d
- Page 32 and 33:
e) ConstructabilityIt is recommenda
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 2.5, continuedCementitious ma
- Page 36 and 37:
• Rehabilitation of a bridge pier
- Page 38 and 39:
UHPC is a cost-effective solution i
- Page 40 and 41:
apparatus will measure the shear st
- Page 42 and 43:
substrate while the scarifying meth
- Page 44 and 45:
such test configuration, this upper
- Page 46 and 47:
From the equilibrium of forces of F
- Page 48 and 49:
The first layer, also called penetr
- Page 50 and 51:
3 MethodologyThis report aims to st
- Page 52 and 53:
f sp = 2 ∗ PA ∗ π in psi Equat
- Page 54 and 55:
that the bond interface, in this lo
- Page 56 and 57:
Ductal® premix is typically compri
- Page 58 and 59:
associated test results (temperatur
- Page 60 and 61:
Figure 3.2 Detail of splitting tens
- Page 62 and 63:
3.3.3 Pull-off testPull off test wa
- Page 64 and 65:
(a) Chipped surface, slightlybrushe
- Page 66 and 67:
(a) Molds to cast slant shearspecim
- Page 68 and 69: Timber moulds were used to cast the
- Page 70 and 71: macrotexture depth was measured in
- Page 72 and 73: As shown in the above tables, the m
- Page 74 and 75: (a) Concrete substrate under water
- Page 76 and 77: used, as shown in Figure 3.17. A fa
- Page 78 and 79: Equation 2.2 and Equation 2.3 were
- Page 80 and 81: (a) Steel disks glued to the UHPC s
- Page 82 and 83: value to the lowest one in the foll
- Page 84 and 85: Transversal frequency (Hz)255025002
- Page 86 and 87: 115113Relative Dynamic Modulus (%)1
- Page 88 and 89: Only those specimens with a grooved
- Page 90 and 91: Table 4.6, continued.MeanMeanCOV,st
- Page 92 and 93: concrete or bond/concrete while for
- Page 94 and 95: surface treatment applied. In contr
- Page 96 and 97: Table 4.8Summary of slant-shear tes
- Page 98 and 99: (a) B(C): Bond due to concrete fail
- Page 100 and 101: 3143Bond Capacity, (psi)30002500200
- Page 102 and 103: The different failure modes obtaine
- Page 104 and 105: failures occurred in the concrete s
- Page 106 and 107: property of the concrete has higher
- Page 108 and 109: 5.1.1 Combination of Splitting Tens
- Page 110 and 111: 5.1.4 Overall performancea. For thi
- Page 112 and 113: mismatch and load eccentricity. Tho
- Page 114 and 115: 6 ReferenceAbu-Tair, A. I., Rigden,
- Page 116 and 117: Climaco, J. C. T. S., and Regan, P.
- Page 120 and 121: Misson, D. (2008). "Influence of Cu
- Page 122 and 123: Silfwerbrand, J. (1990). "Improving
- Page 124 and 125: 7 Appendix: NSC mix designsTable 7.
- Page 126 and 127: Table 7.33rd mix for the splitting
- Page 128 and 129: Table 7.51st mix for the splitting
- Page 130 and 131: Table 7.73rd mix for the splitting
- Page 132 and 133: Figure 8.2 Concrete retarder inform
- Page 134 and 135: Table 9.1, continued.BrBr w/oBr 300
- Page 136 and 137: Table 9.2, continued.TrialBrushed 6
- Page 138 and 139: 10 Appendix: Splitting tensile pris
- Page 140 and 141: Table 10.1, continued.128
- Page 142 and 143: Table 10.1, continued.130
- Page 144 and 145: Table 10.1, continued.132
- Page 146 and 147: Table 10.1, continued.134
- Page 148 and 149: Table 10.2Splitting monolithic NSC
- Page 150 and 151: 11 Appendix: Slant-shear specimens
- Page 152 and 153: Table 11.1, continued.140
- Page 154 and 155: Table 12.1, continued.142
- Page 156 and 157: PortionNumberof 1figures/tables/ill
- Page 158 and 159: Figure 2.5Miguel Angel Carbonell Mu
- Page 160 and 161: Miguel Angel Carbonell Munoz Mon, M
- Page 162 and 163: Miguel - not sure what you need fro
- Page 164 and 165: End Page 1235Type of UsePortionNumb
- Page 166 and 167: Type of UseIntended publisher of ot
Change language