- Page 1 and 2:
Prediction of nutrient removal with
- Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsList of Figures ..
- Page 5 and 6:
3.9 Effect of COD Fractions .......
- Page 7 and 8:
List of FiguresFigure 2.1- Biomass
- Page 9 and 10:
Figure AI.14- D.O. set point itiner
- Page 11 and 12:
Table AI.1- Influent specifier inpu
- Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1: Introduction1.1 Importan
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 2: Literature Review2.1 Nut
- Page 17 and 18:
has a very low cBOD concentration a
- Page 19 and 20:
dissolved oxygen (D.O.) at a suffic
- Page 21 and 22:
Denitrification using biomass decay
- Page 23 and 24:
Figure 2.7- Phoredox process (Rittm
- Page 25 and 26:
increased the mean volatile fatty a
- Page 27 and 28:
used model is the Activated Sludge
- Page 29 and 30:
conditions included a discrete fill
- Page 31 and 32:
3.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant Desc
- Page 33 and 34:
BNR-S2 operated with 1.5 hours simu
- Page 35 and 36:
Effluent 7.2 35 7.8 3.5 0.8 0.8 1.9
- Page 37 and 38:
constant width of 12.6 m over this
- Page 39:
Table 3.5- Sensitivity Parameters f
- Page 42 and 43:
3.6.2 Calibration of BNR-S1 ModeThe
- Page 44 and 45:
Chapter 4 Results and Discussion4.1
- Page 46 and 47:
include 24-hour composite samples t
- Page 48 and 49:
Perecent deviation (predicted - obs
- Page 50 and 51:
Percent deviation (predicted-observ
- Page 52 and 53:
Percent deviaton in value (model-ob
- Page 54 and 55:
Percent deviation in value (modelob
- Page 56 and 57:
4.2.2.2 Aerobic P/PHA uptake and P/
- Page 58 and 59:
Calibrated simulator parameters for
- Page 60 and 61:
Sum absolute value of percent devia
- Page 62 and 63: Absolute value of percent deviation
- Page 64 and 65: Table 4.10- BNR-S2 colder (15.7 o C
- Page 66 and 67: Table 4.13- Width adjustment effect
- Page 68 and 69: Percent removala linear trend from
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 5: Conclusion5.1 SummaryBio
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 6: ReferencesAlleman, J.E.,
- Page 74 and 75: Libra, R. D., Wolter, C. F., and La
- Page 76 and 77: Appendix IBioWin Simulation Setup74
- Page 78 and 79: Figure AI.2 - Influent specifier fr
- Page 80 and 81: Figure AI.5 - Influent specifier fr
- Page 82 and 83: Figure AI.9 - SBR operation page fo
- Page 84 and 85: Figure AI.13 - SBR operation page f
- Page 86 and 87: Appendix IISelected BioWin Simulati
- Page 88 and 89: Table AII.1- Percent deviation from
- Page 90 and 91: Table AII.2- Percent deviation from
- Page 92 and 93: Sum absolute value of percent devia
- Page 94 and 95: AOB and NOB maximum specific growth
- Page 96 and 97: Appendix IIIMonthly Monitoring Repo
- Page 98 and 99: DAYIrrig.1000'sGPDInfluentNH3-Nmg/L
- Page 100 and 101: D RAIN- SETT. RECYCLE Irrig.1000' I
- Page 102 and 103: D RAIN- SETT. RECYCLE Irrig.1000' I
- Page 104 and 105: DAYIrrig.1000'sGPDInfluentNH3-Nmg/L
- Page 106 and 107: DAYIrrig.1000'sGPDInfluentNH3-Nmg/L
- Page 108 and 109: 106
- Page 110 and 111: 108
- Page 114 and 115: 112
- Page 116 and 117: 114
- Page 118 and 119: 116
- Page 120 and 121: 118
- Page 122 and 123: 120
- Page 124 and 125: 122
- Page 126 and 127: 124
- Page 128 and 129: 126
- Page 130 and 131: 128
- Page 132 and 133: 130
- Page 134 and 135: 132
- Page 136 and 137: 134
- Page 138 and 139: 136