12.07.2015 Views

E-Andrew Sindt Creative Component S11.pdf

E-Andrew Sindt Creative Component S11.pdf

E-Andrew Sindt Creative Component S11.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to define the distance from the inflow pipe to the decanter (Figure 4.19). The length of the SBR is thendivided into the three equal sized zones. This error was discovered near the end of the calibration ofBNR-S1 mode and the width parameter was corrected. Next, an analysis was completed on the regularmode calibration and BNR-S1 calibration to identify any differences in effluent parameters caused by thechange in width.Figure 4.19 - Flow distribution in single tank SBR (from BioWin user manual)4.4.1 Effects on Regular ModeNo significant changes in effluent parameters for the regular mode with default and calibrated simulatorparameter settings were observed after correcting the width to 13.8 m (Table 4.12). Based on theseresults, it was determined that the change 1.2 m in width had no significant effects on the regular mode.Table 4.12- Width adjustment effects on regular mode effluent quality aWidth (m) TSS pH cBOD TN NH 3-N NO 2 - -N NO 3 - -N TP COD F. CODDefault Simulator Parametersoriginal, 12.6 8.8 6.9 4.3 7.6 0.2 0.04 4.6 6.5 37.1 26.3corrected, 13.8 8.8 6.9 4.3 7.6 0.2 0.04 4.6 6.5 37.2 26.3Calibrated Simulator Parametersoriginal, 12.6 14.8 6.9 5.9 9.7 1.4 3.7 1.2 5.9 43.8 26.5corrected, 13.8 14.9 6.9 6.0 9.8 1.5 3.7 1.2 5.9 43.9 26.5a concentrations given as mg/L4.4.2 Effects on BNR-S1 ModeNo significant changes in effluent parameters for the BNR-S1 mode with default and calibrated simulatorparameter settings were observed after correcting the width to 13.8 m (Table 4.13). Based on theseresults, it was determined that the change 1.2 m in width had no significant effects on the BNR-S1mode.63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!