Thesis - Teknisk Design

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Conceptual <strong>Design</strong> of Temporary Exhibition Platform and Smart Grid Exhibitionfor Siemens Urban Sustainability CentreAppendix XX - Concept survey ResultsName General Concepts General StructureModules & LoungeSmart Pass & MazeWernerKruckowboth concepts are right and important -let's see what we can physicallyimplementa) the smart pass is a given to me as thisis basically the same concept as in themain exhibition hall with the RFID tags.b) I have my doubts about the practicalityof the path to the smart grid as this wilmostly happen in the corporate crystalwhich means we need to have a simpleand cost effective temporary solution orany sophisticated permanent updatablesolution.From a practcal pointof view I wouldeliminate concept 5and 6 and I am stillsceptical about concept7. Let's see ...JoHensherThe flexibility and updatability are veryimportantConcept 0.3 - it may be too much to havea separate check in counter for thisexhibition. I would suggest exploring theoption of linking with the main exhibitioncheck-in as it will also use smartcards/RFID taggingConcept 0.4 - A two-storey exhibitionmay reduce its ability to be placedelsewhere. In addition we would need tocheck that it would comply with the UK'sdisability discrimination actBettinaPeckconcept needs to be flexible to makeupdates easy. Achieved with concept 1.Idea of lounge area also good as it givesus the opportunity to have a conversationwithin a more relaxed atmospheresmart card idea very good. could belinked with the general exhibition idea.concept 0.4. in general interesting butneeds to be checked if we have enoughspace for this.concept 5 or 6 dependson how much space wehave and where.preferred option is 6concept 8 too "busy".AnnetteDiziol, PBConcept 1: Flexible, easy to transport andrelocate. Can be incorporated into almostany roof shape. very suitable for thebuilding.Concept 2: Idea to conclude a visit of thetemporary exhibition at a cafe/loungearea is very good. Use of cafe/ break outspace at level 1 over the shop advisable.Additional cafe/lounge spaces will be costintensive and not easy to incorporate atthis stage.Concept 3: Smart pass. Very appropriatefor a high tech company such as Siemens.Concept 4: Double storey temporaryarrangements are difficult to include intothe building.Unfortunately 2 storeyelements are difficultto incorporate into thebuilding height andspace wise.A level arrangementthat is coordinatedwith teh layout of thespaces in the pavilionwould work best128
Oskar Karlsson, Petter PolsonMaster <strong>Thesis</strong> 2011 at Chalmers University of TechnologyName STATION 1 - SMART GRID INTRODUCTION STATION 2 - Actors and MarketsWernerKruckowI like 1.1, 1.4, 1.6 and 1.7My favourite is 2.1 - cost?JoHensherMost prefer - 1.1, 1.3, 1,4 Prefer 2.1BettinaPeckAnnetteDiziol, PBexcept 1.2. I think all concepts are interesting. It will dependwhat we will exhibit we then should decide which concept toapply.Concept 1.5 / 1.6/1.7 are my favorite.Especially the tunnel with the time line and the kitchenmagnets is powerful, play full and intelligent. It will beremembered by visitors. Further it is an element which is notincluded in the Event exhibition designconcept 2.1. preferred optionConcept 2.1. It may be beneficial to discusswith Event the set and content of their citygame in order to expand the content and notto provide repeat experiences.Name STATION 3 - Cases and Solutions Outoor conceptsWernerKruckow3.1 is attractive to me you convinced me about 4.4 in our call4.1 won't be feasible as we cn't go underground I was told4.2 I don't see a big impact4.3 please investigate further what is feasible as we don't usethe water at all yetJoHensherLike 3.2 and 3.3 as visitor can take home theinformationThere are many things to consider when designing theoutdoor exhibits.- the majority of the land surrounding the building is not theresponsibility of Siemens, but the local authority- security could be a problem. Our cameras will mainly focuson the building and the immediate land outside it. As the restof the land is public land, we cannot prevent members of thepublic from viewing and possibility destroying these in themiddle of the nightBettinaPeckAnnetteDiziol, PBconcept 3.1 and 3.2. are the preferred optionsas they allow good common interaction withthe customerConcept 3.3 is my favouriteThis is why I really like Augmented reality - its reallyinnovative, only a handful of attractions do this in the UK. Alsoit has the ability to be applied not just for the temporaryexhibition but also for the main exhibitionConcept 4.2 is my clear favourite129
Page 1:
Conceptual Design of Temporary Exhi
Page 7 and 8:
3.5.3 Concept generation ..........
Page 10 and 11:
Figure 5.3 Modular concept with pro
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Oskar Karlsson, Petter PolsonMaster
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89: Conceptual Design of Temporary Exhi
show all

Thesis - Teknisk Design

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?