12.07.2015 Views

Monte Carlo Particle Transport Methods: Neutron and Photon - gnssn

Monte Carlo Particle Transport Methods: Neutron and Photon - gnssn

Monte Carlo Particle Transport Methods: Neutron and Photon - gnssn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

388 <strong>Monte</strong> <strong>Carlo</strong> <strong>Particle</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Methods</strong>: <strong>Neutron</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Photon</strong> Calculationsi.e., the expected score over a flight has a 1/b-type singularity in contrast to the 1/jr' —r*| 2 singularity of the eventwise estimators. I(P) can be easily sampled by selecting a (3value uniformly in [(3,,(3,], i.e., it may also serve as an estimator which has better propertiesthan the next-event estimator. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, it was seen in Chapter 5.Vl that theexpectation estimator f F(P) — I(P) is a member of a broad class of partially unbiasedestimators, <strong>and</strong> there exist several other estimators with similar properties. By analogy tothe class of partially unbiased reaction-rate estimators, a similar class of point estimatorscan also be defined. We shall show that all estimators belonging to the class have a singularityat least as severe as 1/b, <strong>and</strong> therefore it is pointless to seek bounded variance estimatorsamong the commonly used ones.Before doing so, let us discuss in some detail the variance of estimators with 1/bsingularities. Taking the example of the expectation estimator I(P), the dominant term ofthe total second moment for small b isOne is tempted to believe that the 1/b 2singularity drops out, as has happened to thel/|r — r*| 2singularity in the expectation of the next-event estimator. This, however, is notthe case because jr — r*j <strong>and</strong> b are essentially different quantities. The former is the distanceof a collision point (spatial integration point in the second-moment integral) from the detectorpoint r*, while the latter is the distance of a possible flight direction from r*. Their probabilitydensities are different, as follows from the following simplified reasoning. The collisionpoints are assumed to be uniformly distributed in some volume around r* <strong>and</strong> therefore theirdensity function is proportional to 3r 2 dr. The product of the probability density of r <strong>and</strong> thesingularity 1/r 2 is bounded, thus resulting in a finite expectation. As for the density of d,let us consider a given flight direction <strong>and</strong> a plane perpendicular to it that contains the pointr*. The crossing points of the. possible flights in the given direction with the plane areapproximately uniformly distributed over a surface on the plane around r*. Therefore, thedensity function of b is proportional to the area element of the surface, i.e., to 2rdr. <strong>and</strong>,again, only the expected score remains bounded. This also means that Theorem 6.5 appliesto the estimators considered in this section, <strong>and</strong> an estimator with a 1/b singularity providesa total score that converges to its expectation at a rate of (log rn/n U2 .Let us now consider the class of partially unbiased point estimators generated by thetransformation of the expected scattering point estimator f Es(P') according to the formulasin Section 5.VLB. Again. P = (r,E). P' = (r + D w,E), P 1= (r + D,w.E), <strong>and</strong> P 2=(r + D 2co.E). Then, according to Equation (5.223), the transformed estimatorf(P,P') dD, T(D,|r,w,E)X(D,D I)f Es(r + D,w,E)/(6.183)is also partially unbiased, with an arbitrary function X(D 1,D). Here againT(D|r,w,E) = cr(r + Doj,E)exp - dto(r Mw.t-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!