12.07.2015 Views

The Limits of Mathematics and NP Estimation in ... - Chichilnisky

The Limits of Mathematics and NP Estimation in ... - Chichilnisky

The Limits of Mathematics and NP Estimation in ... - Chichilnisky

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> Government-SponsoredTra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Programs on the Labor Market Transitions <strong>of</strong> Disadvantaged Men<strong>The</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> Government-Sponsored Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Programs on the Labor Market Transitions <strong>of</strong> Disadvantaged Men 1157<strong>The</strong> conditional jo<strong>in</strong>t density <strong>of</strong> the duration <strong>of</strong> spell l <strong>and</strong> the dest<strong>in</strong>ation state k is given bythe follow<strong>in</strong>g expressionf (u, k|y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ) = f k (u | y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ)KS j (u | y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ),∏j=1j̸=k= h k (u|y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ) S(u|y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ),where h k (u | y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ) is the hazard function associated with the latent duration u ∗ l,k<strong>and</strong> S(u | y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ) is the survivor function <strong>of</strong> the duration <strong>of</strong> the l th spell. Becausethe latent durations are assumed to be conditionally <strong>in</strong>dependent we haveS(u | y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ) =K∏ S j (u | y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ),j=1where u ≥ 0. <strong>The</strong> expression represents the conditional probability that the duration <strong>of</strong> spell lis at least equal to u or, equivalently, that all latent durations are at least equal to u. <strong>The</strong>refore,the conditional contribution <strong>of</strong> a given sequence to the likelihood function is:n Kl v (θ) = ∏ ∏ h k (u | y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ) δ l,kS k (u | y 1 ,...,y l−1 ; z; ν; θ),l=1 k=1where δ l,k is equal to 1 if the <strong>in</strong>dividual enters <strong>in</strong>to state k at the end <strong>of</strong> spell l <strong>and</strong> to 0otherwise :l = 1,...,n.δ l,k ={ 1, if xτl = k,0, otherwise,3.3 Unobserved heterogeneitySo far the discussion surround<strong>in</strong>g the unobserved heterogeneity components has voluntarilybeen kept general. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> maximum likelihood procedures requires that we specifydistribution functions for these components. Most applications rely on the work <strong>of</strong> Heckman& S<strong>in</strong>ger (1984) <strong>and</strong> approximate arbitrary cont<strong>in</strong>uous distributions us<strong>in</strong>g a f<strong>in</strong>ite number <strong>of</strong>mass po<strong>in</strong>ts (see Gritz (1993), Ham & Rea (1987), Doiron & Gorgens (2008)). More recentpapers use richer specifications that allow the heterogeneity terms to be correlated acrossstates (see Bonnal et al. (1997), Ham & LaLonde (1996)). <strong>The</strong>se specifications are sometimesreferred to as s<strong>in</strong>gle or two-factor load<strong>in</strong>g distributions <strong>and</strong> are also based on a f<strong>in</strong>ite set <strong>of</strong>mass po<strong>in</strong>ts. In our work, we wish to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the robustness <strong>of</strong> the parameter estimatesto various distributional assumptions. We will use two <strong>and</strong> three-factor load<strong>in</strong>g distributionsas <strong>in</strong> the aforementioned papers. Additionally, we will <strong>in</strong>vestigate the consequences on theslope parameters <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g various cont<strong>in</strong>uous distributions <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> the usual f<strong>in</strong>ite sets <strong>of</strong>mass po<strong>in</strong>ts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!