The Limits of Mathematics and NP Estimation in ... - Chichilnisky

The Impact of Government-SponsoredTraining Programs on the Labor Market Transitions of Disadvantaged MenThe Impact of Government-Sponsored Training Programs on the Labor Market Transitions of Disadvantaged Men 3177Burtless, G. (1995). The case for randomized field trials in economic and policy research,Journal of Economic Perspective 9(2): 63–84.Card, D. & Hyslop, D. (2005). Estimating the effects of a time-limited earnings subsidy forwelfare leavers, Econometrica 73.Card, D. & Hyslop, D. R. (2009). The dynamic effects of an earnings subsidy for long-termwelfare recipients: Evidence from the self sufficiency project applicant experiment,Journal of Econometrics 153(1): 1–20.Crépon, B., Gurgand, M., Kamionka, T. & Lequien, L. (2011). Is counseling welfare recipientscost-effective ? Lessons from a random experiment, Mimeo, CREST, Paris.Doiron, D. & Gorgens, T. (2008). State dependence in youth labor market experiences, and theevaluation of policy interventions, Journal of Econometrics 145: 81–97.Duclos, J.-Y., Fortin, B., Lacroix, G. & Roberge, H. (1999). The dynamics of welfareparticipation in Québec, in P. L. & R. Chaykowsky (eds), Women and Work, The JohnDeutch Institute.Edon, C. & Kamionka, T. (2007). Modélisation dynamique de la participation au marché dutravail des femmes en couple, Annales d’économie et de statistique 86: 77–108.Fortin, B., Fougère, D. & Lacroix, G. (1999a). Hausse des barèmes et sorties de l’aide sociale:Les résultats d’une expérience naturelle au Canada, Revue Économique pp. 451–463.Fortin, B., Fougère, D. & Lacroix, G. (1999b). The impact of government-sponsoredtraining programs on labour market transitions, Prepared for Human ResourcesDevelopment Canada.Fortin, B., Lacroix, G. & Drolet, S. (2004). Welfare benefits and the duration of welfarespells: evidence from a natural experiment in canada, Journal of Public Economics88(7-8): 1495 – 1520.Fougère, D. & Kamionka, T. (2008). Econometrics of individual labor market transitions, inL. Mátyás & P. Sevestre (eds), The Econometrics of Panel Data, Advanced Studies inTheoretical and Applied Econometrics, Springer, pp. 865–905.Fougère, D., Kamionka, T. & Priéto, A. (2010). L’efficacité des mesures d’accompagnement surle retour à l’emploi, Revue Economique 61(3): 599–612.Gouriéroux, C. & Monfort, A. (1992). Modèles de durée et effets de génération, Working Paper# 9125, CREST, Paris.Gourriéroux, C. & Monfort, A. (1991). Simulation based econometrics in models withheterogeneity, Annales d’économie et de statistique 20(1): 69–107.Gritz, R. (1993). The impact of training on the frequency and the duration of employment,Journal of Econometrics 57: 21–51.Ham, J. & LaLonde, R. (1996). The effect of sample selection and intitial conditions in durationmodels: Evidence from experimental data on training, Econometrica 64(1): 175–205.Ham, J. & Rea, S. (1987). Unemployment insurance and male unemployment duration incanada, Journal of Human Resources pp. 325–353.Heckman, J. & Flinn, C. (1983). Are unemployment and out of the labor force beheviorallydistinct labor force states ?, Journal of Labor Economics 1(1).Heckman, J., LaLonde, R. & Smith, J. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labormarket programs, in O. Ashenfelter & E. D. Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics,North-Holland, chapter.Heckman, J. & Singer, B. (1984). A method for minimizing the distributional assumptions ineconometric models for duration data, Econometrica pp. 271–320.