30.11.2012 Views

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen - Genres

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The neglected diversity of immigrant gardens in Germany - examples from Bonn<br />

even keep animals like chicken and sheep there. Because the people spend nearby<br />

more time there than in their flats, these immigrant gardens should not be named and<br />

classified as home gardens but as a separate, independent category of gardens,<br />

comparable with the Cuban ‘conucos’ (see HAMMER et al. 1992-1994) or the ‘road<br />

gardens’ described by ARROWSMITH et al. (1998) from rural regions of lower Austria.<br />

Interactions and frequent travelling activities of people from different regions promote<br />

their integration into the German society. Families manage their own gardens in<br />

order to have enough traditional food, making them independent from the market.<br />

The more that immigrants live and work in an area, the more arable land is used for<br />

gardens. The rents for leasing are very low - in contrast to the price of soil.<br />

Limitations to gardening do not exist other than the time and energy of the people.<br />

The immigrants contribute actively to increase the diversity of cultivated plants in<br />

Germany by farming, gardening, trading and exchanging their native germplasm.<br />

They influence the markets through selecting of species and varieties (see HAMMER<br />

et al. 2001). People from Asia and Russia often establish special shops with exotic<br />

food and spices, or species which were used by Germans in former times and which<br />

are neglected crops here today (e.g., buckwheat, Fagopyrum spp.; cranberries,<br />

Vaccinium spp.). These exotic or forgotten foods reach more and more reputation for<br />

German consumers as well.<br />

Gene centres<br />

Germany is not told to be part of a centre of crop biodiversity. It is known as a typical<br />

non-centre (HARLAN 1971). At the moment, ten primary gene centres are defined<br />

and accepted by scientists as bio-geographic regions where wild relatives occur<br />

together with a very high intraspecific variation of cultivated plants. Migration<br />

processes led to a semiconservative distribution of cultures and crops (SZABÓ 1996),<br />

not affecting the diversity of the centres of origin. Besides these primary gene<br />

centres, centres of biodiversity or primary hot spots of crop diversity secondary<br />

centres exist. They are characterised by the non-origin of the respective crop.<br />

Secondary centres are frequently geographically isolated. Wild relatives of the<br />

respective crop are missing (SCHMALZ 1980). The evolutionary processes and<br />

domestication of species introduced from other regions of the world continue but<br />

selection pressure differs and new characters are evolving in new natural and cultural<br />

regions soon, frequently with old farming tradition. In these cases, only the plant<br />

material is transferred while the primary farmers and their culture remain. Examples<br />

for a primary gene centre on species level is America for garden beans. The genus<br />

Phaseolus has about 50 wild species, five of which have been domesticated from still<br />

living wild forms of central America (DEBOUCK 2000). Western Asia and the<br />

Mediterranean area are examples for secondary centres of this plant species. A third<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!