42Eshagh M. and Kiamehr R. (2007) AStrategy for Optimum Designing<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Geodetic Networks from<strong>the</strong> Cost, Reliability and PrecisionViews, Acta Geod. Geophys.Hung. 42(3) : 297-308.Eshagh M. and Najafi-Alamdari M.(2007) Perturbations in orbitalelements <strong>of</strong> a low Earth Orbiting(LEO) satellite, J. Earth & SpacePhys., 33(1) : 1-12.Eshagh M. and Sjöberg, L.E. (2009)Topographic and atmosphericeffects on GOCE gradiomeric datain local north oriented frame: Acase study in Fennoscandia andIran, Stud. Geophys. Geod. 53:61-80.Eshagh M. and Sjöberg L.E. (2008)Impact <strong>of</strong> Topography andatmosphere over Iran onvalidation and inversion <strong>of</strong> GOCEgradiometric data, J Earth & SpacePhys., 34 (3) : 15-30.Eshagh M. and Sjöberg L.E. (2008) Themodified best quadratic unbiasednon-negative estima<strong>to</strong>r(MBQUNE) <strong>of</strong> variancecomponents, Stud. Geophy. Geod.52 :305-320.Eshagh M. and Sjöberg L. E. (2009)Atmospheric effects on satellitegravity gradiometry data, JGeodynamics, 47:9-19.Eshagh M. and Sjöberg L. E. (2009)Satellite Gravity Gradiometry: Anapproach <strong>to</strong> high resolutiongravity field modeling from space.VDM verlag, 244 p., ISBN-13 : 978-3639203509.Eshagh M., Sjöberg L. E. and KiamehrR. (2007) Evaluation <strong>of</strong> robusttechniques in suppressing <strong>the</strong>impact <strong>of</strong> outliers in adeformation moni<strong>to</strong>ring network -A case study on <strong>the</strong> Tehran Milad<strong>to</strong>wer network, Acta Geod.Geophys. Hunga., 42(4) : 449-463.Fan H. (2006) 3-Dimensionalcoordinate transformation withlarge rotations and scale change.Presented at <strong>the</strong> InternationalWorkshop on GeospatialInformation Technology, 27-28Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2006. TechnicalUniversity <strong>of</strong> Moldova, Chisinau.Fan H. (2009) Direct solution <strong>of</strong> 3Dcoordinate transformationparameters. Presented at <strong>the</strong>International Congress Geo-Siberia 2009, Novosibirsk, Russia,April 23-26, 2009.Horemuz M. (2009). Infrastructure fornavigation in urban and indoorareas – feasibility study. <strong>Report</strong>from research project rupportedby Stiftelsen J Gust Richert.Jacoby W. R., Hartmann O., Wallner H.,Smilde P. L., Buerger S., Sjöberg L.E., Erlingsson S., Wolf D.,Klemann V. and Sasgen I. (2009)Temporal gravity variations nearshrinking Vatnajökull ice cap,Iceland, Pure appl. geophys.166:1283-1302.Kiamehr R. (2007) A new height datumfor Iran based on <strong>the</strong> combination<strong>of</strong> gravimetric and geometricgeoid models, Acta Geod.Geophys. Hung. 42:69-81.Kiamehr R. (2007) Qualification andrefinement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gravity databasebased on cross-validationapproach-A case study <strong>of</strong> Iran,Acta Geod. Geophys Hung.42:285-295.
43Kiamehr R. and Eshagh M. (2008)Estimation <strong>of</strong> variancecomponents Ellipsoidal, Geoidaland orthometrical heights, J Earth& Space Phys., 34(3) : 1-13.Kiamehr R. and Eshagh M. (2008)EGMlab, a scientific s<strong>of</strong>tware fordetermining <strong>the</strong> gravity andgradient components from globalgeopotential models, Earth Sci.Inf. 1 : 93-103.Kiamehr R., Eshagh M. and Sjöberg LE,(2008) Interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>general geophysical patterns <strong>of</strong>Iran based on <strong>the</strong> gradientcomponents analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>GRACE , Acta Geophys., 56(2) :440-454.Kiamehr R. and Sjöberg L.E. (2010) Anoptimum way <strong>to</strong> determine aprecise gravimetric geoid basedon <strong>the</strong> least-squares modification<strong>of</strong> S<strong>to</strong>kes’ formula-A case study <strong>of</strong><strong>Sweden</strong>, Acta Geod. Geophys.Hung. 45:148-164.Sjöberg L. E. (2007) The <strong>to</strong>pographicbias by analytical continuation inphysical geodey. J Geod. 81:345-350.Sjöberg L. E. (2007) Precisedetermination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Clairautconstant in ellipsoidal geodesy.Surv. Rev. 39:81-86.Sjöberg L. E. (2007) Answers <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>comments by M. Vermeer on L.E.Sjöberg (2007) The <strong>to</strong>pographicbias by analytical continuation inphysical geodesy. J Geod. 81:345-350.Sjöberg L. E. (2008) A stricttransformation from Cartesian <strong>to</strong>Geodetic coordinate, Surv. Rev.40:156-163.Sjöberg L.E. (2008) Geodeticintersection on <strong>the</strong> ellipsoid, JGeod, 82:565-567.Sjöberg L.E. (2008) New solutions <strong>to</strong>classical geodetic problems on <strong>the</strong>ellipsoid. In M Sideris (Ed.):Observing our changing Earth.IAG Symposia Vol. 133:781-784.Sjöberg L.E. (2009) The terraincorrection in gravimetric geoidcomputation-is it needed?Geophys. J. Int. 176:14-18.Sjöberg L.E. (2009) On <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>pographicbias in geoid determination by <strong>the</strong>external gravity field, J Geod.83:967-972.Sjöberg L. E. (2009) Solving Vening-Meinesz-Moritz inverse problemin isostasy, Geophys. J. Int. 179:1527-1536.Sjöberg L.E. (2010) Solving <strong>the</strong><strong>to</strong>pographic potential bias as aninitial value problem, Art. Sat.44(3): 75-84.Sjöberg L. E. (2010) A strict formula forgeoid-<strong>to</strong>-quasigeoid separation, JGeod (in press).Sjöberg L.E. and Eshagh M. (2009) Ageoid solution for airborne gravitydata, Stud. Geophys. Geod. 53:359-374.Sjöberg L.E. and Eshagh M. (2010)Considering data gaps in geoidmodelling by modifying S<strong>to</strong>kes'sformula, Acta Geod. Geophys.Hung. 45:165-183.Ågren J., Sjöberg L.E. and Kiamehr R.(2009) The new gravimetricquasigeoid model KTH08 over<strong>Sweden</strong>, J. Applied Geod.3(3):143-153.
- Page 1 and 2: National Report of Sweden to the NK
- Page 3 and 4: 3- Provide DGPS 13 /DGNSS 14correct
- Page 5 and 6: 5a flexible and redundant service,
- Page 7 and 8: 7from the RIX 95 project are used f
- Page 9 and 10: 9Lantmäteriet has since 2007 madei
- Page 11 and 12: 11(Lidberg, 2007). The other one, t
- Page 13 and 14: 132. Geodetic activities at KTH,the
- Page 15 and 16: 153. Geodetic activities atChalmers
- Page 17 and 18: 17comparison and evaluation offrequ
- Page 19 and 20: 19importance for the operational we
- Page 21 and 22: 214. ReferencesAndersson J V (2008)
- Page 23 and 24: 23List of published geodetic papers
- Page 25 and 26: 25International journalsNorin D (20
- Page 27 and 28: 27Francis O et al. (among others En
- Page 29 and 30: 29EUREF, 2006 Symposium, June14-17
- Page 31 and 32: 31Tregoning & Rizos (eds) (2007):Dy
- Page 33 and 34: 33International postersJämtnäs L,
- Page 35 and 36: 35Swedish journalsnummer 2 april-ju
- Page 37 and 38: 37Swedish conference proceedingsand
- Page 39 and 40: 39Other publicationsEkman M & Ågre
- Page 41: 41biases in gradiometry, Contr.Geop
- Page 45 and 46: 45List of published geodetic papers
- Page 47 and 48: 47Haas Rüdiger, Scherneck Hans-Geo
- Page 49 and 50: 49the atmospheric water vapourconte
- Page 51 and 52: 51April 2009, IEEE catalog number:C
- Page 53 and 54: 53Olsson Per-Anders, Scherneck Hans