12.07.2015 Views

The Extent, Nature and Effectiveness of Planned Approaches in ...

The Extent, Nature and Effectiveness of Planned Approaches in ...

The Extent, Nature and Effectiveness of Planned Approaches in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Potential weaknesses <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent or small group study.• <strong>The</strong> success <strong>of</strong> this strategy is cont<strong>in</strong>gent upon time management, timetabl<strong>in</strong>g, availability <strong>of</strong>resources, checkpo<strong>in</strong>ts, student knowledge <strong>of</strong> research <strong>and</strong> product development <strong>and</strong>assessment (M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Education, 2000).• This strategy may not always achieve the desired level <strong>of</strong> work because (1) the topic is toobroad or not clearly def<strong>in</strong>ed so the student is unsure what is expected; (2) the required learn<strong>in</strong>gskills are not identified or taught; (3) the construction <strong>of</strong> the study programme is <strong>in</strong>adequate;or (4) there is <strong>in</strong>sufficient guidance <strong>of</strong>fered to the student (Cathcart, 1994).Recommendations for effective facilitation <strong>of</strong> small group or <strong>in</strong>dependent study.• Due to the time <strong>and</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong>to an <strong>in</strong>dependent study, teachers must ensure itbecomes a highly effective learn<strong>in</strong>g experience (Cathcart, 1994).• Allow longer susta<strong>in</strong>ed periods <strong>of</strong> time for study <strong>and</strong> research, us<strong>in</strong>g flexible timetabl<strong>in</strong>g(McAlp<strong>in</strong>e, 1994).• Consider different group<strong>in</strong>gs, for example, pairs, trios, as well as <strong>in</strong>dividual research(McAlp<strong>in</strong>e, 1994).• Encourage self-<strong>in</strong>itiated learn<strong>in</strong>g, based on student <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>and</strong> a problem-f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g approach(McAlp<strong>in</strong>e, 1994).• <strong>The</strong> teacher needs to evaluate the learner’s need for guidance or coach<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> to put <strong>in</strong> placethe steps required to ga<strong>in</strong> a level <strong>of</strong> competence <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iciency (Toml<strong>in</strong>son & Imbeau, 1999).Learn<strong>in</strong>g Centres<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g centres as a strategy for meet<strong>in</strong>g the needs <strong>of</strong> gifted <strong>and</strong> talented learners <strong>in</strong> aregular class is commonly reported <strong>in</strong> the literature. Learn<strong>in</strong>g centres (or sometimes called challengecentres) have been described as: extended activities, pegged at the level <strong>of</strong> the learner (Van Tassel-Baska, 1994); a station or group <strong>of</strong> materials <strong>and</strong> resources that learners can use to study topics orpractise <strong>and</strong> re<strong>in</strong>force skills (Toml<strong>in</strong>son, 2001); <strong>and</strong> places <strong>in</strong> a classroom for self-directed learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>differentiated content (Riley, <strong>in</strong> press c). Despite small differences <strong>in</strong> explanation, most agree thatlearn<strong>in</strong>g or challenge centres are physical places, usually <strong>in</strong> a classroom, where learn<strong>in</strong>g activities areavailable for students to engage <strong>in</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re is <strong>of</strong>ten some form <strong>of</strong> choice <strong>and</strong> self-management <strong>in</strong>volved<strong>in</strong> a learn<strong>in</strong>g centre.Potential strengths <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g centres.• Useful <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g enrichment or acceleration <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g students to work at their ownlevel <strong>and</strong> pace (Toml<strong>in</strong>son, 2001; W<strong>in</strong>ebrenner, 2001).• Allow for student choice (Cathcart, 1994; Heacox, 2002; Van Tassel-Baska, 1994) which is akey factor <strong>in</strong> motivat<strong>in</strong>g students to learn (Stipek, 1998)• Emphasis on self-directed learn<strong>in</strong>g (Heacox, 2002; Riley, <strong>in</strong> press c).• Toml<strong>in</strong>son (2001) also suggests that learn<strong>in</strong>g centres frees up the teacher for small group,direct <strong>in</strong>struction.• Learn<strong>in</strong>g centres can be designed around learn<strong>in</strong>g styles or multiple <strong>in</strong>telligences (Heacox,2002; W<strong>in</strong>ebrenner, 2001) <strong>and</strong> can be used with students <strong>of</strong> any age <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> any curriculumarea (Davis & Rimm, 1998; Heacox, 2002).• Kaplan (1999) suggests tak<strong>in</strong>g a learn<strong>in</strong>g centre approach to <strong>in</strong>dependent study because <strong>of</strong> itsadvantages <strong>in</strong> shift<strong>in</strong>g the responsibility from the teacher to the student <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g how toconduct an <strong>in</strong>vestigation or project.• Learn<strong>in</strong>g centres can be an <strong>in</strong>tegral part <strong>of</strong> the curriculum <strong>and</strong> its delivery (Riley, <strong>in</strong> press c).84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!