12.07.2015 Views

The Extent, Nature and Effectiveness of Planned Approaches in ...

The Extent, Nature and Effectiveness of Planned Approaches in ...

The Extent, Nature and Effectiveness of Planned Approaches in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Developed specifically as a model for gifted <strong>and</strong> talented students, the Integrated Curriculum Model iscomprised <strong>of</strong> three components: advanced content; high-level process <strong>and</strong> product work; <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tra<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>ter-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary concept development (Van Tassel-Baska & Brown, 2001). It is a ‘step up’ fromthe core curriculum <strong>in</strong> its advancement <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> expected levels <strong>of</strong> excellence <strong>and</strong> expertise<strong>in</strong> both learn<strong>in</strong>g processes <strong>and</strong> products. Van Tassel-Baska (1997) believes that these three elementsare “the best approaches to curriculum development <strong>and</strong> implementation” (p. 128) <strong>and</strong> describes theirsynthesis <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g ways:1. Discipl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> study are framed through an emphasis on advanced knowledge.2. Higher order th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g are developed.3. Learn<strong>in</strong>g experiences are created around major issues, themes <strong>and</strong> ideas that reoccur <strong>in</strong> realworld applications <strong>and</strong> theoretical underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> across discipl<strong>in</strong>es.Curriculum <strong>in</strong>tegration is not simply an organisational strategy, rather, it is a way <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about thepurposes <strong>of</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g, the sources <strong>of</strong> curriculum, <strong>and</strong> the uses <strong>of</strong> knowledge (Beane, 1995). Beaneadvocates that the central focus <strong>of</strong> curriculum <strong>in</strong>tegration is the search for self <strong>and</strong> social mean<strong>in</strong>g. It isbased on a view <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g as the cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> new knowledge <strong>and</strong> experience. <strong>The</strong>discipl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> knowledge are drawn on <strong>in</strong> a responsible curriculum <strong>in</strong>tegration; they are “clearly notthe enemies <strong>of</strong> curriculum <strong>in</strong>tegration” (p. 622).Potential strengths <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated curriculum.• Previous research <strong>in</strong>dicates that an <strong>in</strong>tegrated curriculum can replace the isolatedcompartmentalised learn<strong>in</strong>g experienced by some gifted <strong>and</strong> talented students (Clark, 1997;Maker, 1983).• An <strong>in</strong>tegrated curriculum provides a framework to help students br<strong>in</strong>g together <strong>in</strong> somemean<strong>in</strong>gful way the many experiences they encounter both <strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> out <strong>of</strong> school (Vars &Rakow, 1993).• It also encourages the natural <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> gifted <strong>and</strong> talented students to make connectionsamong abstract ideas while enrich<strong>in</strong>g the students’ general education (Vars & Rakow, 1993).• With an <strong>in</strong>tegrated curriculum approach, curriculum is co-constructed by the questions <strong>and</strong>concerns collaboratively developed by students <strong>and</strong> teachers (Fraser, 2000; Jenk<strong>in</strong>s, 2002).• Gives gifted <strong>and</strong> talented students the opportunity to become immersed <strong>in</strong> a study <strong>of</strong> personal<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>and</strong> to <strong>in</strong>ternally <strong>in</strong>tegrate <strong>in</strong>formation by mak<strong>in</strong>g connections (Fogarty, 1991).Potential weaknesses <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated curriculum.• <strong>The</strong> curriculum <strong>in</strong>tegration approach is misunderstood (Beane, 1995).• <strong>The</strong>re is a danger that if curriculum <strong>in</strong>tegration is an approach used for all students, gifted <strong>and</strong>talented students may still be overlooked <strong>in</strong> its plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> delivery.Recommendations for effective use <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated curriculum.• Integrat<strong>in</strong>g models <strong>and</strong> approaches with solid <strong>in</strong>structional strategies would be moreresponsive to the needs <strong>of</strong> practitioners (Brighton, 2001).• Use a step-by-step plan for plann<strong>in</strong>g differentiated <strong>in</strong>tegrated units <strong>of</strong> study (for example, seeRiley, 1997; Kaplan, 2001; Roberts & Roberts, 2001).• Programm<strong>in</strong>g for gifted <strong>and</strong> talented students, as well as the students with special needs,should be part <strong>of</strong> the overall <strong>in</strong>tegrated curriculum plann<strong>in</strong>g, not an add on (Conway, 2001;McAlp<strong>in</strong>e, 1994).87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!