- Page 6: IntroductionSocial media benefits:
- Page 10 and 11: Social Media Issues: Students & Par
- Page 12 and 13: Legal ToolsNot-so-helpful precedent
- Page 14 and 15: Tips1. Review/revise computer use p
- Page 16 and 17: Pension and Benefits:Changing Lands
- Page 18 and 19: Reducing Pension Benefits• Signif
- Page 20 and 21: Reducing Pension Benefits• Defini
- Page 22 and 23: Halliburton Group Canada Inc. v. Al
- Page 24 and 25: Quinn v. New Brunswick, 2011 NBQB 1
- Page 26 and 27: Reducing Pension Benefits• Quinn
- Page 28 and 29: Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
- Page 30 and 31: Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
- Page 32 and 33: Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
- Page 34 and 35: Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
- Page 36 and 37: Budget News - Pension• Reform mea
- Page 38 and 39: Budget News - PensionJSPPs (cont’
- Page 40 and 41: Budget News - PensionUniversity Pla
- Page 42 and 43: Pension and Benefits:Changing Lands
- Page 44 and 45: Highlights• Executive Compensatio
- Page 46 and 47: Executive Compensation• Base sala
- Page 48 and 49: Collective Bargaining• No wage fr
- Page 50 and 51: Collective Bargaining• To increas
- Page 52 and 53:
Communicating During BargainingMich
- Page 54 and 55:
Collective Bargaining 2012 - ETFO A
- Page 56 and 57:
College Academic Bargaining• Prop
- Page 58 and 59:
Employer Can Communicate During Bar
- Page 60 and 61:
Cannot Circumvent Union• Kingston
- Page 62 and 63:
Context Is Everything• Forinteck
- Page 64 and 65:
Communicating During BargainingMich
- Page 66 and 67:
Duty to Respond - General Principle
- Page 68 and 69:
Case Study 1: Nelson v. Lakehead Un
- Page 70 and 71:
Case Study 3: Miraglia v. Universit
- Page 72 and 73:
Harassment and Discrimination Polic
- Page 74 and 75:
Accessibility for Ontarians with Di
- Page 76 and 77:
IAS: Select Standards - 2012 and 20
- Page 78 and 79:
IAS: Select Standards - 2015 to 202
- Page 80 and 81:
AODA - Project Planning• over 20
- Page 82 and 83:
ACADEMIC FREEDOMCustody and Control
- Page 84 and 85:
Arbitration• The Faculty Associat
- Page 86 and 87:
Results1) Adjudicator held that the
- Page 88 and 89:
ACADEMIC FREEDOMCustody and Control
- Page 90 and 91:
Overview1. Solicitor/Client Privile
- Page 92 and 93:
1. Solicitor/Client Privilege: Prin
- Page 94 and 95:
1. Solicitor/Client Privilege: Prin
- Page 96 and 97:
1. Solicitor/Client Privilege: Prin
- Page 98 and 99:
2. Rules of Professional Conduct: R
- Page 100 and 101:
2. Practical Example of Rule 2.03
- Page 102 and 103:
2. Practical Example of Rule 2.03
- Page 104 and 105:
2. Rules of Professional Conduct: R
- Page 106 and 107:
3. Managing Communication Pitfalls
- Page 108 and 109:
3. Managing Communication Pitfalls
- Page 110 and 111:
3. Dublin v. Montessori, 2006 (ON S
- Page 112 and 113:
3. Dublin v. Montessori, 2006 (ON S
- Page 114 and 115:
3. Kaganovsky v. 2057057 Ontario In
- Page 116 and 117:
3. Kaganovsky v. 2057057 Ontario In
- Page 118 and 119:
3. Lana v. University of Alberta, 2
- Page 120 and 121:
4. Who is the client?• Privileged
- Page 122 and 123:
4. Who is the client?• Where the
- Page 124 and 125:
4. Who is the client?• Difficulti
- Page 126 and 127:
4. Who is the client?• Issues tha
- Page 128 and 129:
4. Who is the client?• Does in-ho
- Page 130 and 131:
Solicitor/Client Privilege in theUn