Subject Resistance Review, <strong>2011</strong>108In <strong>2011</strong>, there were 402,490 police responses to calls for service in which contact was made with the public.This represents a 13.63% increase over responses to 2010 calls for service.Table 1: Responses to Calls for Service (contact with public) Comparison 2010-<strong>2011</strong>2010 <strong>2011</strong> Percent ChangeJanuary 25,111 32,143 28.00%February 21,373 29,261 36.91%March 25,765 32,844 27.48%April 26,031 34,356 31.98%May 30,143 37,264 23.62%June 28,864 36,158 25.27%July 29,709 37,037 24.67%August 35,446 37,006 4.40%September 35,564 34,458 -3.11%October 35,266 32,298 -8.42%November 32,004 30,497 -4.71%December 28,941 29,168 0.78%Totals 354,217 402,490 13.63%Of the 402,490 responses, there were 749 incidents or 0.19% which required <strong>of</strong>ficers to respond to resistingsubjects. There were 1,324 separate Subject Resistance <strong>Report</strong>s (SRR) generated from the 749 incidents whichinvolved 816 actors. Table #2 shows the distribution <strong>of</strong> these incidents by Police Zone <strong>of</strong> occurrenceTABLE 2 – Subject Resistance Incidents by Zone <strong>of</strong> OccurrencePolice Zone 2010 <strong>2011</strong> Percent ChangeZone 1 150 160 6.67%Zone 2 139 120 -13.67%Zone 3 227 225 -0.88%Zone 4 60 58 -3.33%Zone 5 125 137 9.60%Zone 6 44 37 -15.91%Other 9 12 33.33%Totals 754* 749** -5.07%*While this column adds up to 754, INCIDENTS total is the real number <strong>of</strong> unique (distinct) incidents, because some ccr-numbers cross zones.**While this column adds up to 749, INCIDENTS total is the real number <strong>of</strong> unique (distinct) incidents, because some ccr-numbers cross zones.Officers responded to subject resistance in 5.52% <strong>of</strong> the total arrests (arrest section covered previously in thisreport).The following pie chart and Table #3 show the distribution <strong>of</strong> arrests requiring <strong>of</strong>ficers to respond to subjectresistance by shift.Distribution <strong>of</strong> Subject Resistance Incidents by ShiftP.M.362, 49%Night302, 40%A.M.83, 11%
109TABLE 2 – <strong>2011</strong> Recap – Subject Resistance Incidents by Zone, hour and shift <strong>of</strong> each incidentA.M.P.M.NightZone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6ByhourByshiftByhourByshiftByhourByshiftByhourByshiftByhourByshiftByhourByshift0700-0800 01611801509117080800-0900 0 1 1 0 0 30900-1000 2 1 2 0 0 01000-1100 0 3 0 0 2 11100-1200 2 3 2 2 2 11200-1300 5 4 5 0 3 11300-1400 3 2 3 2 4 21400-1500 4325501500-1600 1011097545422867401600-1700 13 10 5 4 8 21700-1800 11 7 8 2 13 31800-1900 9 10 10 2 9 21900-2000 11 9 3 0 11 42000-2100 27 6 7 4 12 12100-2200 18 13 6 3 7 52200-2300 11111111842300-2400 12394291815732144722400-0100 8 8 22 4 10 10100-0200 10 7 56 7 7 20200-0300 4 7 48 4 12 20300-0400 1 2 7 1 9 00400-0500 2 0 4 2 3 10500-0600 2 1 0 0 0 10600-0700 002<strong>City</strong>wide, there was a 0.38% decrease in total Subject Resistance <strong>Report</strong>s completed when comparing <strong>2011</strong> to2010. Table #4, “2010/<strong>2011</strong> Comparison <strong>of</strong> Subject Resistance <strong>Report</strong>s,” identifies the number <strong>of</strong> subjectresistance reports completed by each duty location in 2010 and <strong>2011</strong> and the percentage <strong>of</strong> increase or decrease.Table 4: 2010/<strong>2011</strong> Comparison <strong>of</strong> Subject Resistance <strong>Report</strong>sPolice Unit 2010 <strong>2011</strong> Percent ChangeZone 1 189 212 12.17%Zone 2 195 160 -17.95%Zone 3 220 203 -7.73%Zone 4 87 73 -16.09%Zone 5 182 223 22.53%Zone 6 38 49 28.95%SRU 26 0 -100.00%Bike 17 13 -23.53%SWAT 1 10 900.00%Narcotics/Vice 164 160 -2.44%Major Crimes 6 4 -33.33%Off Duty 189 204 7.94%Traffic 13 12 -7.69%DUI Checkpoint 2 1 -50.00%Chief's Office 0 0Support 0 0020219
- Page 3:
family of brands includes Epiphone,
- Page 6:
Message from the Chief of Police6Gr
- Page 9 and 10:
3. Policy:4. Reports:i. information
- Page 11 and 12:
ii. Impose appropriate discipline o
- Page 13 and 14:
localized coalitions have been form
- Page 15 and 16:
15History of Our BadgeIn 1873, the
- Page 17 and 18:
Organization of the Bureau17
- Page 19 and 20:
19Distribution of Officers by RankM
- Page 21 and 22:
Distribution of Personnel by Rank,
- Page 23 and 24:
Number of Sworn Personnel Hired, 20
- Page 25 and 26:
Administration BranchThe Administra
- Page 27 and 28:
existence - identities and capabili
- Page 29 and 30:
29• Review daily offense and arre
- Page 31 and 32:
Ignition Interlock ClassIn June and
- Page 33 and 34:
Central Records and Reports Unit Th
- Page 35 and 36:
• Automated Police Reporting Syst
- Page 37 and 38:
37Result of Disciplinary Actions In
- Page 39 and 40:
Pittsburgh Police Civil Actions, 20
- Page 41 and 42:
Frank Beal v. City of Pittsburgh, E
- Page 43 and 44:
Dontae Parrish v. City of Pittsburg
- Page 45 and 46:
Diana Rader v. City of Pittsburgh,
- Page 47 and 48:
John Anderson v. City of Pittsburgh
- Page 49 and 50:
Night Felony (412-323-7147):The Nig
- Page 52 and 53:
Operations BranchThe Operations Bra
- Page 54 and 55:
54Special Deployment Division: The
- Page 56 and 57:
56• Greentree Police Department -
- Page 58 and 59: Crime in the City of Pittsburgh, 20
- Page 60 and 61: Crime by Neighborhood, 201160Crimes
- Page 62 and 63: 62Neighborhood2000PopulationTotal P
- Page 64 and 65: 64Part I Offenses Known toCentralLa
- Page 66 and 67: 66Part I Offenses Known toLaw Enfor
- Page 68 and 69: 68Part I Offenses Known toLaw Enfor
- Page 70 and 71: 70Part II Offenses Known toLaw Enfo
- Page 72 and 73: 72Part II Offenses Known toLaw Enfo
- Page 74 and 75: 74Part II Offenses Known toLaw Enfo
- Page 76 and 77: 76Part II Offenses Known toLaw Enfo
- Page 78 and 79: Homicides in the City of Pittsburgh
- Page 80 and 81: 3. Homicide - Weapon Used:80Homicid
- Page 82 and 83: 7. Offender Prior Involvement with
- Page 84 and 85: 842011 Arrests by Month160014001200
- Page 86 and 87: The following table provides a coun
- Page 88 and 89: 88TotalCallsZone 5 Zone 6Responding
- Page 90 and 91: 90Channel 7 & 8TRUA.M. P.M. Night A
- Page 92 and 93: 92CitywideJanuaryFebruaryMarchApril
- Page 94 and 95: 4. Race and Gender of Driver: The r
- Page 96 and 97: 5. Traffic Stops by Neighborhood:96
- Page 98 and 99: Neighborhood Count PercentSummer Hi
- Page 100 and 101: City of Pittsburgh Police Pursuits
- Page 102 and 103: 9. Date/Time Analysis of Pursuits:1
- Page 104 and 105: h. Violator - Tire Deflation Deploy
- Page 106 and 107: 5. Field Contacts/Warrantless Searc
- Page 110 and 111: Academy 0 0VCFTF 0 0Graffiti Task F
- Page 112 and 113: Firearms Review112There were 70 fir
- Page 114 and 115: Pittsburgh Police Deaths, 2011114In
- Page 116 and 117: Patrolman George J. SalladeOctober
- Page 118: Notice of Right to File a Complaint