12.07.2015 Views

Ivancevic_Applied-Diff-Geom

Ivancevic_Applied-Diff-Geom

Ivancevic_Applied-Diff-Geom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Applied</strong> Manifold <strong>Geom</strong>etry 437(iv) (Ω 1 + iΩ 2 ) ∧ (Ω 1 − iΩ 2 ) = ω n (resp. iω n ) if n is even (resp. odd)(v) dω = 0, dΩ 1 = 0, dΩ 2 = 0.These conditions (together with a positivity condition) we now showserve to characterize CY manifolds. Firstly if Ω c = Ω 1 + iΩ 2 is locallydecomposable as θ 1 ∧ θ 2 ∧ ... ∧ θ n , then take the subbundle Λ of T ∗ M ⊗ Cspanned by θ 1 , . . . , θ n . By (iv) and the fact that ω n ≠ 0, we haveθ 1 ∧ · · · ∧ θ n ∧ ¯θ 1 ∧ · · · ∧ ¯θ n ≠ 0and so T ∗ M = Λ + ¯Λ and we have an almost–complex structure. In thisdescription a 1−form θ is of type (1, 0) iff Ω c ∧ θ = 0. Since from (v)dΩ 1 = dΩ 2 = 0, this means that Ω c ∧ dθ = 0. Writingdθ = ∑ a ij θ i ∧ θ j + ∑ b ij θ i ∧ ¯θ j + ∑ c ij¯θi ∧ ¯θ j (3.241)we see that c ij = 0. Thus the ideal generated by Λ is closed under exteriordifferentiation, and (by the Newlander–Nirenberg Theorem) the structureis integrable.Similarly, applying the decomposition of 2–forms (3.241) to ω, (iii) impliesthat the (0, 2)−component vanishes, and since ω is real, it is of type(1, 1). It is closed by (v), so if the Hermitian form so defined is positivedefinite, then we have a Kähler metric.Since Ω c is closed and of type (n, 0) it is a non–vanishing holomorphicsection s of the canonical bundle. Relative to the trivialization s, the Hermitianconnection has connection form given by ∂ ln(‖s‖ 2 ). But property(iv) implies that it has constant length, so the connection form vanishesand s = Ω c is covariant constant.3.14.3 Special Lagrangian SubmanifoldsA submanifold L of a symplectic manifold X is Lagrangian if ω restricts tozero on L and dim X = 2 dim L. A submanifold of a CY manifold is specialLagrangian if in addition Ω = Ω 1 restricts to zero on L. This conditioninvolves only two out of the three forms, and in many respects what weshall be doing is to treat them both, the 2–form ω and the n−form Ω, onthe same footing.Here we need to emphasize the following remarks:1. We could relax the definition a little since Ω c is a chosen holomorphicn−form: any constant multiple of Ω c would also be covariant constant, sounder some circumstances we may need to say that L is special Lagrangianif, for some non–zero c 1 , c 2 ∈ R, c 1 Ω 1 + c 2 Ω 2 = 0.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!