12.07.2015 Views

Ivancevic_Applied-Diff-Geom

Ivancevic_Applied-Diff-Geom

Ivancevic_Applied-Diff-Geom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Applied</strong> Bundle <strong>Geom</strong>etry 573The geometry of Z on TM gives a way of globally pulling out the adjointJacobi equation from the PMP in an intrinsic manner, which is not generallypossible in the PMP [Lewis (2000b)].4.9.6 Brain–Like Control Functor in BiodynamicsIn this final section we propose our most recent model [<strong>Ivancevic</strong> and Beagley(2005)] of the complete biodynamical brain–like control functor. Thisis a neurodynamical reflection on our covariant force law, F i = mg ij a j ,and its associated covariant force functor F ∗ : T T ∗ M → T T M (see section3.13.4.1 above).Recall that traditional hierarchical robot control (see, e.g., [Vukobratovicand Stokic (1982); Vukobratovic et al. (1990)]) consists of three levels:the executive control–level (at the bottom) performs tracking of nominaltrajectories in internal–joint coordinates, the strategic control–level (atthe top) performs ‘planning’ of trajectories of an end–effector in external–Cartesian coordinates, and the tactical control–level (in the middle) connectsother two levels by means of inverse kinematics.The modern version of the hierarchical robot control includes decision–making done by the neural (or, neuro–fuzzy) classifier to adapt the (manipulator)control to dynamically changing environment.On the other hand, the so–called ‘intelligent’ approach to robot controltypically represents a form of function approximation, which is itself basedon some combination of neuro–fuzzy–genetic computations. Many specialissues and workshops focusing on physiological models for robot controlreflect the increased attention for the development of cerebellar models [vander Smagt (1999); Schaal and Atkeson (1998); Schaal (1999); Schaal (1998);Arbib (1998)] for learning robot control with functional decomposition,where the main result could be formulated as: the cerebellum is more thenjust the function approximator.In this section we try to fit between these three approaches for humanoidcontrol, emphasizing the role of muscle–like robot actuators. Wepropose a new, physiologically based, tensor–invariant, hierarchical forcecontrol (FC, for short) for the physiologically realistic biodynamics. Weconsider the muscular torque one–forms F i as the most important componentof human–like motion; therefore we propose the sophisticated hierarchicalsystem for the subtle F i −-control: corresponding to the spinal, thecerebellar and cortical levels of human motor control. F i are first set–upas testing input–signals to biodynamics, and then covariantly updated as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!