12.07.2015 Views

Ivancevic_Applied-Diff-Geom

Ivancevic_Applied-Diff-Geom

Ivancevic_Applied-Diff-Geom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

776 <strong>Applied</strong> <strong>Diff</strong>erential <strong>Geom</strong>etry: A Modern Introductionthe quadratic Casimir h ∨ g coincides with the dual Coxeter number of g,defined byh ∨ g = 1 + max α (α ∨ · ρ), (4.283)∑α>0α is thewhere α ∨ = 2αα 2 is the coroot associated to α, and ρ = 1 2well–known Weyl vector.For simply laced Lie algebras g (ADE algebras), we have h g = h ∨ g , andthe preceding scaling limits apply. However, for non simply–laced algebras(B n , C n , G 2 , F 4 ), we have h g > h ∨ g , and our earlier considerations show thatthe untwisted elliptic CM Hamiltonians do not tend to a finite limit, q → 0,M is kept fixed. This is why the twisted Hamiltonian systems (4.273) haveto be introduced. The twisting produces precisely to an improvement inthe asymptotic behavior of the potential which allows a finite, non–triviallimit. More precisely, we can writem 2 ℘ ν (x) = ν22We have the following Theorem:Under the limit∞∑n=−∞m 2ch ν(x − 2nω 2 ) − 1 . (4.284)1x = X + 2ω 2h ∨ ρ, m = Mq − 12h ∨ g ,gwith ρ the Weyl vector and q → 0, the Hamiltonian of the twisted ellipticCM–system for the simple Lie algebra g tends to the Hamiltonian of theToda system for the affine Lie algebra (g (1) ) ∨ .So far we have discussed only the scaling limits of the Hamiltonians.However, similar arguments show that the Lax pairs constructed belowalso have finite, non–trivial scaling limits whenever this is the case for theHamiltonians. The spectral parameter z should scale as e z = Zq 1 2 , with Zfixed. The parameter Z can be identified with the loop group parameterfor the resulting affine Toda system.4.14.11.5 Lax Pairs for CM–SystemsLet the rank of g be n, and d be its dimension. Let Λ be a representation ofg of dimension N, of weights λ I , 1 ≤ I ≤ N. Let u I ∈ C N be the weightsof the fundamental representation of GL(N, C). Project orthogonally theu I ’s onto the λ I ’s as su I = λ I + u I and λ I ⊥ v J . It is easily verifiedthat s 2 is the second Dynkin index. Then α IJ = λ I − λ J is a weight of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!