12.07.2015 Views

7817 Annual Report 2009.qxd - Shire

7817 Annual Report 2009.qxd - Shire

7817 Annual Report 2009.qxd - Shire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40 <strong>Shire</strong> plc <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> and Accounts 2009Corporate governance statementBoard and Committee meetings (1)The attendance of the Directors at Board and Committees meetings held in 2009 was as follows:Audit,Science &DirectorsBoard Board Compliance & Remuneration Nomination Technology(scheduled) (ad hoc) Risk Committee Committee Committee CommitteeMatthew Emmens (2) 5/5 1/2 n/a n/a 5/5 n/aAngus Russell 5/5 2/2 n/a n/a n/a n/aGraham Hetherington 5/5 2/2 n/a n/a n/a n/aDavid Kappler (5) 5/5 1/2 5/5 n/a 5/5 n/aPatrick Langlois 5/5 2/2 5/5 5/5 n/a n/aDr Jeffrey Leiden 5/5 2/2 n/a 5/5 5/5 5/5Kate Nealon (5) 5/5 1/2 5/5 5/5 n/a n/aDavid Stout 1/1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aFormer DirectorsDavid Mott (5) 4/4 1/2 5/5 n/a n/a n/aDr Barry Price (3) (5) 4/5 1/2 n/a n/a 4/4 3/5Dr Michael Rosenblatt (4) 4/5 2/2 n/a 1/1 1/1 5/5(1) X/y where ‘x’ is the number of meetings attended and ‘y’ is the number of meetings that could have been attended. For example 2/4 indicates two meetings attended out of a possible four.(2) Matthew Emmens did not attend one ad hoc meeting due to a conflict of interest.(3) Dr Price was unable to attend one scheduled board meeting and one scheduled Science & Technology Committee meeting due to personal reasons and due to prior commitments he wasunable to attend an additional Science & Technology Committee meeting.(4) Dr Rosenblatt was unable to attend one board meeting due to a conflict with a prior commitment.(5) Due to prior commitments a number of Directors were unable to attend one ad hoc board meeting.The Chairman and the Non-Executive Directors met four times during the year without the Executive Directors being present.Supply of informationThe Executive Directors and the Company Secretary are responsible for ensuring that detailed information is provided to Board members in advanceof any scheduled or ad hoc Board meeting. Before decisions are made, consideration is given to the adequacy of information available to the Boardand, if necessary, decisions are deferred if further information is required.Appointment and re-election of DirectorsThe Board has authority to appoint any person to be a Director to either fill a vacancy or as an addition to the existing Board. Any Director so appointedmust retire and offer himself for election at the next AGM.Non-Executive Directors are appointed by the Board ordinarily for a term of two years. At the expiration of the two year term Non-Executive Directorsare not required to be re-elected by shareholders (unless the expiration of the term coincides with a particular Non-Executive Directors turn to retireby rotation), but may be re-appointed by the Board. Non-Executive Directors who have served on the Board for nine years or more are appointedby the Board for one year terms and, in accordance with the Combined Code, are subject to annual re-election by shareholders.No Director serves for more than three years without retiring and offering himself for re-election by shareholders.The terms of appointment of each of the Non-Executive Directors and the service contracts of the Executive Directors are made available for inspectionat the Company’s AGM.Board performance evaluationThe Company engaged an independent external consultant to conduct the Board effectiveness evaluation review in 2009.The Board consideredthe timing of the review to be appropriate, given that Mr Emmens and Mr Russell have been respectively Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany since June 2008. To ensure that the review was as effective as possible the comments made by Board members were non-attributable.Each Board member completed a confidential questionnaire and then met individually in person with the external consultant. The external consultantalso attended Board and Committee meetings as an observer to review the culture and Board dynamics. The review was broad ranging and includedconsideration of the quality of briefings received from management, whether the Board’s time was well managed and whether sufficient time wasreserved for the key issues facing the Company, the quality of discussion at meetings, the effectiveness of the Chairman, how well the BoardCommittee’s are functioning, views on individual contributions from Board members and the overall composition of the Board. As part of the reviewthe Board considered the transition of Mr Emmens to Chairman and Mr Russell to CEO and it concluded that the transitions had been very successful.The Board also considered whether the Chairman and other members of the Board were able to devote sufficient time to their roles given their othercommitments. The Board concluded that Mr Emmens and the other members of the Board had been able to do so. Each Board member receiveda report aggregating the responses and findings from the review. The Board dedicated a meeting, facilitated by the external consultant, to review anddiscuss the findings of the evaluation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!