12.07.2015 Views

TCSPC for FLIM and FRET in - Boston Electronics Corporation

TCSPC for FLIM and FRET in - Boston Electronics Corporation

TCSPC for FLIM and FRET in - Boston Electronics Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cornerstones of Fluorescence Lifetime Imag<strong>in</strong>gTime ResolutionThe lifetimes of highly efficient fluorescence markers are typically <strong>in</strong> the region of a few ns.However, these dyes are selected <strong>for</strong> high quantum yield. Lifetimes of less efficient chromophorescan easily be below 100 ps. Quench<strong>in</strong>g effects can reduce the lifetime down to a few 10 ps, <strong>and</strong> thelifetime of the quenched donor fluorescence <strong>in</strong> <strong>FRET</strong> experiments is <strong>in</strong> the order of 100 to 300 ps.There<strong>for</strong>e, a good lifetime system should resolve fluorescence decay functions down to the order of10 ps.The fluorescence decay curves of <strong>in</strong> biological samples are often multi-exponential. There can beseveral chromophores <strong>in</strong> the same part of a cell, a s<strong>in</strong>gle chromophore can be quenched witch nonuni<strong>for</strong>mefficiency, or there can be quenched <strong>and</strong> unquenched molecules <strong>in</strong> the same part of the cell.There<strong>for</strong>e, the ability to resolve multi-exponential decay functions is an absolute requirement to getquantitative results. Resolv<strong>in</strong>g two or even more exponential terms <strong>in</strong> a decay function requires datawith an excellent signal-to-noise ratio.Signal-to-Noise RatioDue to the short lifetimes, the measurement of fluorescence decay functions requires a detectionb<strong>and</strong>width <strong>in</strong> the GHz range. The high b<strong>and</strong>width does not only dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> very fast detectors <strong>and</strong>detection electronics, it poses also a noise problem. The noise <strong>in</strong> fast optical measurements is almostessentially shot noise, i.e. the fluctuation of the number of photons detected with<strong>in</strong> the resolv<strong>in</strong>gtime of the measurement system. The best signal-to-noise ratio, SNR, that can be achieved isSNR = n 1/2with n be<strong>in</strong>g the number of photons detected with<strong>in</strong> the resolved time <strong>in</strong>terval. Actually the SNRcan be even lower due to background signals orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the detector or com<strong>in</strong>g from theenvironment, r<strong>and</strong>om ga<strong>in</strong> fluctuations <strong>in</strong> the detector, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>efficient acquisition of the detectedphotons <strong>in</strong> the subsequent signal process<strong>in</strong>g cha<strong>in</strong>.Acceptable steady state images can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>for</strong> less than 100 photons detected per pixel of theimage. However, lifetime measurements actually deliver a stack of images <strong>for</strong> - <strong>in</strong> case of timedoma<strong>in</strong>methods - different times after the excitation or - <strong>in</strong> case of frequency doma<strong>in</strong> methods - <strong>for</strong>different phases <strong>and</strong> modulation frequencies. There<strong>for</strong>e, the number of photons required to getlifetime <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation is much larger. Although rough lifetime <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle exponential canbe obta<strong>in</strong>ed from only 100 detected photons high accuracy measurements <strong>for</strong> multi-exponentialdecay analysis can easily require 10.000 or 100.000 photons per pixel [80].Un<strong>for</strong>tunately the number of photons that can be emitted from the sample <strong>in</strong> a given time <strong>in</strong>terval islimited by the sample itself.Detection efficiencyThe detection efficiency <strong>for</strong> the photons emitted be the sample depends on the optical system <strong>and</strong> onthe detector. The efficiency of a microscope depends on the numerical aperture of the microscopeobjective, NA, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creases with NA 2 . The effective NA can be doubled by us<strong>in</strong>g the 4Pi technique[37].It is often claimed that the efficiency <strong>for</strong> non-descanned detection is considerably higher than <strong>for</strong>descanned detection. This is certa<strong>in</strong>ly true <strong>for</strong> deep-tissue imag<strong>in</strong>g when the emission light isscattered <strong>in</strong> the sample <strong>and</strong> cannot be fed through a p<strong>in</strong>hole. However, state-of the art microscopeshave p<strong>in</strong>holes with adjustable diameter. For imag<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle cells there is no noticeable differencebetween descanned <strong>and</strong> non-descanned detection.13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!