12.07.2015 Views

Statement on Equalisation for GMPs AND the application of a ...

Statement on Equalisation for GMPs AND the application of a ...

Statement on Equalisation for GMPs AND the application of a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

where:[264.00 x 1.0625 5 ] x [(1 + (1x52+38)/700) x (1.028x1.03)]=427.182.7% and 3% are UK Guaranteed Minimum Pensi<strong>on</strong> Increase Orders effective <strong>on</strong> 6 April2006 and 6 April 2007 respectively.Back-paymentsThe member is entitled to <strong>the</strong> higher payment that would have been made to a member <strong>of</strong>ei<strong>the</strong>r sex be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> Assessment Date. The table below shows <strong>the</strong> annual rate <strong>of</strong> pensi<strong>on</strong><strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> male and equivalent female with <strong>the</strong> higher figures at anytime shown in red.Although <strong>the</strong> male NPA 60 tranche is higher than <strong>the</strong> female NPA 60 tranche at 1/11/2005,<strong>on</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> NPA 65 tranche has been taken into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> member is better <strong>of</strong>f beingtreated as a female member.Annual rate <strong>of</strong> pensi<strong>on</strong>with effect from:Male£ paEquivalent Female£ paNPA 60 NPA 65 NPA 60 NPA 65OverallShortfall£ pa01/11/2005 874.89 2,193.55 863.53 2,243.84 38.93*06/04/2006 874.89 2,193.55 875.06 2,280.54 87.1606/04/2007 874.89 2,193.55 888.24 2,322.42 142.22**01/05/2007*** 874.89 1,974.20 888.24 2,233.95* Would need to be pro-rated <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1/11/2005 – 06/04/2006** Would need to be pro-rated <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 6/4/2007 – 01/05/2007*** From Relevant Time no fur<strong>the</strong>r comparis<strong>on</strong> necessaryOverall Increase in Pre 97 PPF compensati<strong>on</strong> at <strong>the</strong> Relevant Time= (888.24 + 2,233.95) – (874.89 +1,974.20) = £273.10 paAt <strong>the</strong> Relevant Time <strong>the</strong> member would be better <strong>of</strong>f being treated as a female member.The change in Pre 97 PPF compensati<strong>on</strong> <strong>for</strong> this example has been illustrated using <strong>the</strong>standard Pensi<strong>on</strong>er Forms 3(a) below.150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!